INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

CSM 2017 Ethics Answer Writing and Learning Together Here

1568101145

Comments

  • Kindly Review

    Q.2 Explain how ethics contributes to social and human well-being.
  • Kindly Review

    Q.3 Anger is a harmful negative emotion. It is injurious to both personal life and work life. (a) Discuss how it leads to negative emotions and undesirable behaviours. (b) How can it be managed and controlled?

  • Q) Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct so as to make it conducive to civilised social existence (a) Discuss How they achieve this objective (b) Giving Example show How the two differs in their approaches.

    Ans : Law try to achieve the goal of the civilised social existence by
    (a) Treating ceratin acts illegal. Illegal acts are punished by the Judiciary.
    (b) In this way it also brinngs deterrance to some acts which can disturb the peace and harmony of Harmonised society ex UAPA( Unlawful activities prevention acts)
    (c) There ar various enabling legislation for the weaker section of the society like Reservation for SC/ST/OBC and Anti Dowry Act etc
    (d) Law aims to protect individual fundamental rights like freedom,euality etc. At the same Time Social Harmony is ensured by Laws through specific legislation ex 153 A of IPC
    (e) Machinary like direct periodic election to legislature, Judicial Review , Constitutional Amendment , Appealte mechanism in Judiciary , Rule of Law aims to reform Law to achieve the objective of the progressive society.

    Ethics try to achieve the objetive of civilised society by
    (a) Helping Individual to make right decision.
    (b) Enculcating a Norm and Value of Moral Conducts in the society.
    (c) Enriching Culture
    (d) Helping in reforming and Enacting progressive legislations
    (e) Helping in adminsitrative reform etc
    Let us take the example of the problem of child labour in India.
    We have Child Labour Prohibition act in this connection. But it is very poorly implemented. This act have enough deterrence but poor socio-cultural sanction for this led to the poor implementation.
    Ethics can provide rational and emotional resolution for the child labour abolition. It can also bring in supporting socio-cultural change. Which can alone led to the abolition of child labour in India and world.
    In this way we see that law without supporting ethical society and culture leds to poor implementation. If a synthesis between the two is done we can expect transformation of our society.
    Good attempt,
    The only point i want to add is that you did not covered second aspect.
    Law and ethics - differences and examples of how they differ.
    Certain acts are legal but still debatable when comes to ethical quandary.for e.g abortion,capital punishment,coersion in right to privacy of citizenary.
    Laws may be unjust or blatantly unethical for e.g provision of sedition section 124 A, rowlatt act violating them may be illegal but not still ethical.
  • edited June 2017

    Q) Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct so as to make it conducive to civilised social existence (a) Discuss How they achieve this objective (b) Giving Example show How the two differs in their approaches.

    Ans : Law try to achieve the goal of the civilised social existence by
    (a) Treating ceratin acts illegal. Illegal acts are punished by the Judiciary.
    (b) In this way it also brinngs deterrance to some acts which can disturb the peace and harmony of Harmonised society ex UAPA( Unlawful activities prevention acts)
    (c) There ar various enabling legislation for the weaker section of the society like Reservation for SC/ST/OBC and Anti Dowry Act etc
    (d) Law aims to protect individual fundamental rights like freedom,euality etc. At the same Time Social Harmony is ensured by Laws through specific legislation ex 153 A of IPC
    (e) Machinary like direct periodic election to legislature, Judicial Review , Constitutional Amendment , Appealte mechanism in Judiciary , Rule of Law aims to reform Law to achieve the objective of the progressive society.

    Ethics try to achieve the objetive of civilised society by
    (a) Helping Individual to make right decision.
    (b) Enculcating a Norm and Value of Moral Conducts in the society.
    (c) Enriching Culture
    (d) Helping in reforming and Enacting progressive legislations
    (e) Helping in adminsitrative reform etc
    Let us take the example of the problem of child labour in India.
    We have Child Labour Prohibition act in this connection. But it is very poorly implemented. This act have enough deterrence but poor socio-cultural sanction for this led to the poor implementation.
    Ethics can provide rational and emotional resolution for the child labour abolition. It can also bring in supporting socio-cultural change. Which can alone led to the abolition of child labour in India and world.
    In this way we see that law without supporting ethical society and culture leds to poor implementation. If a synthesis between the two is done we can expect transformation of our society.
    GOOD ATTEMPT ! KEEP IT UP.. !!

    My style of writing same question-

    1. Civilized society existence and need of instruments of Behaviour regulation.

    (gave kautilya reference in intro..

    ..without Instruments of behaviour regulation existence of civilized society is impossible bcz then what the kautilya calls "MATSYANYAYA -Big fish eating smaller one" and "JUNGLE RAJ - anarchy and chaos" will prevail !)

    2. Ethics and Law = 2 important instrument of behaviour regulation. Defining both terms briefly here.

    3. How they achieve objectives ?

    # preventive impact

    #punitive impact

    # guiding lamp

    # inner control vs outer control

    # need to be in civilized society and hence utility of observing societal laws and moral principles


    etc etc ..give 1 or 2 SHORT examples at suitable places


    # How 2 differs?

    1. Intrinsic vs extrinsic

    2. Preventive vs punitive

    3. More effective vs less effective

    4. Universal vs Contextual

    (Explained with 1 2 examples)

    .. a simple diagram showing two spheres where ethical circle surrounds smaller law circle..


    So both are complementary supplementary. But something may be ethical yet illegal or legal yet unethical. For a good and just society both should go together and synonymous.




    I write like this :)

  • Q) Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct so as to make it conducive to civilised social existence (a) Discuss How they achieve this objective (b) Giving Example show How the two differs in their approaches.

    Ans : Law try to achieve the goal of the civilised social existence by
    (a) Treating ceratin acts illegal. Illegal acts are punished by the Judiciary.
    (b) In this way it also brinngs deterrance to some acts which can disturb the peace and harmony of Harmonised society ex UAPA( Unlawful activities prevention acts)
    (c) There ar various enabling legislation for the weaker section of the society like Reservation for SC/ST/OBC and Anti Dowry Act etc
    (d) Law aims to protect individual fundamental rights like freedom,euality etc. At the same Time Social Harmony is ensured by Laws through specific legislation ex 153 A of IPC
    (e) Machinary like direct periodic election to legislature, Judicial Review , Constitutional Amendment , Appealte mechanism in Judiciary , Rule of Law aims to reform Law to achieve the objective of the progressive society.

    Ethics try to achieve the objetive of civilised society by
    (a) Helping Individual to make right decision.
    (b) Enculcating a Norm and Value of Moral Conducts in the society.
    (c) Enriching Culture
    (d) Helping in reforming and Enacting progressive legislations
    (e) Helping in adminsitrative reform etc
    Let us take the example of the problem of child labour in India.
    We have Child Labour Prohibition act in this connection. But it is very poorly implemented. This act have enough deterrence but poor socio-cultural sanction for this led to the poor implementation.
    Ethics can provide rational and emotional resolution for the child labour abolition. It can also bring in supporting socio-cultural change. Which can alone led to the abolition of child labour in India and world.
    In this way we see that law without supporting ethical society and culture leds to poor implementation. If a synthesis between the two is done we can expect transformation of our society.
    GOOD ATTEMPT ! KEEP IT UP.. !!

    My style of writing same question-

    1. Civilized society existence and need of instruments of Behaviour regulation.

    (gave kautilya reference in intro..

    ..without Instruments of behaviour regulation existence of civilized society is impossible bcz then what the kautilya calls "MATSYANYAYA -Big fish eating smaller one" and "JUNGLE RAJ - anarchy and chaos" will prevail !)

    2. Ethics and Law = 2 important instrument of behaviour regulation. Defining both terms briefly here.

    3. How they achieve objectives ?

    # preventive impact

    #punitive impact

    # guiding lamp

    # inner control vs outer control

    # need to be in civilized society and hence utility of observing societal laws and moral principles


    etc etc ..give 1 or 2 SHORT examples at suitable places


    # How 2 differs?

    1. Intrinsic vs extrinsic

    2. Preventive vs punitive

    3. More effective vs less effective

    4. Universal vs Contextual

    (Explained with 1 2 examples)

    .. a simple diagram showing two spheres where ethical circle surrounds smaller law circle..


    So both are complementary supplementary. But something may be ethical yet illegal or legal yet unethical. For a good and just society both should go together and synonymous.




    I write like this :)
    @Yo_Yo_Choti_Singh i wrote on similar lines except kautilya point

  • Q) Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct so as to make it conducive to civilised social existence (a) Discuss How they achieve this objective (b) Giving Example show How the two differs in their approaches.

    Ans : Law try to achieve the goal of the civilised social existence by
    (a) Treating ceratin acts illegal. Illegal acts are punished by the Judiciary.
    (b) In this way it also brinngs deterrance to some acts which can disturb the peace and harmony of Harmonised society ex UAPA( Unlawful activities prevention acts)
    (c) There ar various enabling legislation for the weaker section of the society like Reservation for SC/ST/OBC and Anti Dowry Act etc
    (d) Law aims to protect individual fundamental rights like freedom,euality etc. At the same Time Social Harmony is ensured by Laws through specific legislation ex 153 A of IPC
    (e) Machinary like direct periodic election to legislature, Judicial Review , Constitutional Amendment , Appealte mechanism in Judiciary , Rule of Law aims to reform Law to achieve the objective of the progressive society.

    Ethics try to achieve the objetive of civilised society by
    (a) Helping Individual to make right decision.
    (b) Enculcating a Norm and Value of Moral Conducts in the society.
    (c) Enriching Culture
    (d) Helping in reforming and Enacting progressive legislations
    (e) Helping in adminsitrative reform etc
    Let us take the example of the problem of child labour in India.
    We have Child Labour Prohibition act in this connection. But it is very poorly implemented. This act have enough deterrence but poor socio-cultural sanction for this led to the poor implementation.
    Ethics can provide rational and emotional resolution for the child labour abolition. It can also bring in supporting socio-cultural change. Which can alone led to the abolition of child labour in India and world.
    In this way we see that law without supporting ethical society and culture leds to poor implementation. If a synthesis between the two is done we can expect transformation of our society.
    GOOD ATTEMPT ! KEEP IT UP.. !!

    My style of writing same question-

    1. Civilized society existence and need of instruments of Behaviour regulation.

    (gave kautilya reference in intro..

    ..without Instruments of behaviour regulation existence of civilized society is impossible bcz then what the kautilya calls "MATSYANYAYA -Big fish eating smaller one" and "JUNGLE RAJ - anarchy and chaos" will prevail !)

    2. Ethics and Law = 2 important instrument of behaviour regulation. Defining both terms briefly here.

    3. How they achieve objectives ?

    # preventive impact

    #punitive impact

    # guiding lamp

    # inner control vs outer control

    # need to be in civilized society and hence utility of observing societal laws and moral principles


    etc etc ..give 1 or 2 SHORT examples at suitable places


    # How 2 differs?

    1. Intrinsic vs extrinsic

    2. Preventive vs punitive

    3. More effective vs less effective

    4. Universal vs Contextual

    (Explained with 1 2 examples)

    .. a simple diagram showing two spheres where ethical circle surrounds smaller law circle..


    So both are complementary supplementary. But something may be ethical yet illegal or legal yet unethical. For a good and just society both should go together and synonymous.




    I write like this :)
    Thanks a lot for review :)

  • Q) Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct so as to make it conducive to civilised social existence (a) Discuss How they achieve this objective (b) Giving Example show How the two differs in their approaches.

    Ans : Law try to achieve the goal of the civilised social existence by
    (a) Treating ceratin acts illegal. Illegal acts are punished by the Judiciary.
    (b) In this way it also brinngs deterrance to some acts which can disturb the peace and harmony of Harmonised society ex UAPA( Unlawful activities prevention acts)
    (c) There ar various enabling legislation for the weaker section of the society like Reservation for SC/ST/OBC and Anti Dowry Act etc
    (d) Law aims to protect individual fundamental rights like freedom,euality etc. At the same Time Social Harmony is ensured by Laws through specific legislation ex 153 A of IPC
    (e) Machinary like direct periodic election to legislature, Judicial Review , Constitutional Amendment , Appealte mechanism in Judiciary , Rule of Law aims to reform Law to achieve the objective of the progressive society.

    Ethics try to achieve the objetive of civilised society by
    (a) Helping Individual to make right decision.
    (b) Enculcating a Norm and Value of Moral Conducts in the society.
    (c) Enriching Culture
    (d) Helping in reforming and Enacting progressive legislations
    (e) Helping in adminsitrative reform etc
    Let us take the example of the problem of child labour in India.
    We have Child Labour Prohibition act in this connection. But it is very poorly implemented. This act have enough deterrence but poor socio-cultural sanction for this led to the poor implementation.
    Ethics can provide rational and emotional resolution for the child labour abolition. It can also bring in supporting socio-cultural change. Which can alone led to the abolition of child labour in India and world.
    In this way we see that law without supporting ethical society and culture leds to poor implementation. If a synthesis between the two is done we can expect transformation of our society.
    Good attempt,
    The only point i want to add is that you did not covered second aspect.
    Law and ethics - differences and examples of how they differ.
    Certain acts are legal but still debatable when comes to ethical quandary.for e.g abortion,capital punishment,coersion in right to privacy of citizenary.
    Laws may be unjust or blatantly unethical for e.g provision of sedition section 124 A, rowlatt act violating them may be illegal but not still ethical.
    thanks for review :)
  • Bhailog not able to start my study for mains...wat i should do....just sitting alone...feeling empty after pre..
  • hello everyone..... please suggest material for ethics static part and case studies also.
  • chemical factory waala case study dicscuss karna bhailog
Sign In or Join to comment.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google