INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

CSM 2017 Ethics Answer Writing and Learning Together Here

145791045

Comments

  • @Yo_Yo_Choti_Singh sir please write fresh engineering graduate chemical industry case study
    thank you
    Will write as soon as i start writing questions.. till that you people write and review each other.. DON'T BE A PASSIVE ONLOOKER OF THE THREAD.. bcz the more ppl come out the more will be the perspectives coming out WHICH ONLY CAN HELP YOU to rectify your lacunas adequately and timely..

    So i hope people will start contributing meaningfully to this thread soon rather than awaiting a single person viewpoints.. IT IS NOT GOING TO HELP YOU.. write answers regularly and get it reviewed by MULTIPLE minds and incorporate best suggestions in your writing style in future questions.. that's the only way WE CAN LEARN TOGETHER :) ATB


    PS- If anyone want to suggest any better strategy to move forward in the thread.. please do suggest ! TIA :)
  • edited June 2017
    Bhailog ye qoute pe upsc wale itna q khus hote hai..essay aur ethics me qoute demand karte hai..kisi 3rd person ka qoute unka acha lagta hai..aur jo hum apna orogianal "qoute" 200 word me likhte wo bekar hai....q xhakkar hai ye..mujhe to apna kudh ka ratta mara notes nahi yaad ata exam me ..ye gandhi mandela ka qoute kaha yaad ayega...
    .
    Not true for ethics. Mera ek dost hai. Quote rattne ka boss hai woh and he uses quotes to an unbelievable level in all his ethics answers. Answer writing bhi bohot sahi hai uska. Finally uska 89 aaye. Ek doosra friend hai mera, no quotes at all, simple, lucid, practical and from the heart likha usne. Similar to yo yo choti, 117 aaye.
    Adding to this further. There is a huge difference between 'ethical knowledge' and 'ethical competence'.

    By ethical knowledge i mean that koi bhi kuch bhi rattke likh sakta hai to show his ethical knowledge, lekin you will not get a lot of marks.

    On the other hand, according to the 2nd principal,.. i.e- ethical competence, don't complicate matters too much, dil se likho with a positive outlook. I can guarantee that you will get above average marks, provided that aapka english sahi hai and you have at least some basic flair to string together sentences in a coherent manner. And by saying english being good, i do NOT mean using bombastic words. Ekdom simple and chill rahne ka.
    84p1
    74p2
    94p3
    72p4
    Itne badw baiman nahi hu yaar...i was expecting 100+..almost i was on line of choti singh way of dealing with case study..mention many example..like singur land issue.... bachan sahab use in SBA persuaion q..public liability act in water pollution..voluntary sector act 2007...and many more...i dont wat the f**k they want...
    @raj87 Brother, its not same.
    Many candidates have same points infact same level of thinking as sources are same many of the times or overall evolution.
    But there is definitely one thing that differentiates is structural arrangment of ideas so that reader make most sense of it and like it. (For e.g. quote likhne se utna imapct nahi padta jitna sahi jagah par likhne se padta hai)
    Thats where the difference in marks come amongst many candidates with same level of information thinking or ideation.
    I myself scored miserably in 2015 (81).
    Despite knowing all things and writing them but after results i reanalysed wat could be wrong.
    This time my score was 107.(which is neither great nor bad).but i think i still got more marks than 2015 despite fact that i attempted all questions in 2015.in 2016 i was not able to answer two 10 markers.
  • My quick time answer to Last year OLD LADY CASE STUDY -


    Jha tk mujhe yaad h..

    1st line - 1st i will again verify personally whether old lady is truly eligible and only document lack is the problem.. if yes then I will ensure that old lady gets the benefit of the scheme immediately even if it involve some tweaking or breaking of rules.



    (Then just dropped key points/lines )

    Why-

    1. Rules for public not vice versa

    2. Bureaucratic Redtapism hv done more harm than good in our country.. in the name of archaic rigid rules evn genuine public interest not served.


    3. Erosion of public faith in the system due to blind rule driven follow up


    4. Any good public servant should not just understand well the laws but more importantly the loopholes of the laws..so tweaking of laws always possible but only thing is it should be done in OPEN TRANSPARENT AND PUBLIC INTEREST DRIVEN MANNER WITH INVOLVING/INFORMING THE SENIOR HIERARCHY EXPLICITLY


    5. I will search the provisions or loopholes available thru which i can give benefits to the lady firstly and timely. I will personally verify and write the file noting that although no document but i as a competent authority is reasonably satisfied that she is a deserving beneficiary. (Intelligent transgression of the law !)


    6. Then once this is done i will search for alternative like quick making of her requisite documents within a reasonable period and then attach them for official record maintenance purpose.


    7. Now i wil ensure that scheme provisions is changed to institutionalize such kind of Exceptional cases and there redressal in a proper And objective manner like Tehsildar approved affidavit or self attested affidavit valid for some time if genuine beneficiary etc.



    8. Finally i know that sooner rather than later i will be questioned or even can be brought to court ..but it's ok.. i am young plus knowledge but the old lady have nothing.. so i will be ready to bear all the pain of legal proceedings to get a genuine old lady beneficiary her due benefits on time.


    9. As ex PM on CS day function said
    " A public servant should be Biased towards the poor destitute and vulnerable sections of the society."

    So i will happily take this biased step to help the old lady.
    i got 56/250, :|
    let me also share what i wrote so that people can make me aware of mistakes.

    Wrote it in a elaborate way, but summarizing it here in points,
    1. Rules are there for both ordinary and extra ordinary situations. This is an extra ordinary situation and i will have to ensure that i "apply" the rule in such a way that the aim of the rules are maintained.
    2. The aim of the rules pertaining to this schemes was to make sure the scheme is efficiently delivered to everyone and also make sure no multiple persons or ineligible person gets the benefit of the scheme.
    3. Lady does not have documents, so there are two things to consider, establishing identity of the lady(To prohibit multiple benefit case) and ensuring that her age is as per the requirements of the scheme.
    4. For identity, Bio metrics will be scanned and stored into database.
    5. For ensuring age is proper, will be referred immediately to a doctor to get the necessary tests done. If such cases are large, a doctor's camp will be set up in the office or if this is an isolated case, a person from the office will accompany the lady to ensure things move smoothly and quickly.

    So i gave this solution :|

    Mistakes according to me,
    1. Did not relate it to the current system in India - While talking about bio metrics etc i should have quoted the provisions from the aadhar card and linked it as an example.
    2. should have mentioned more words like transparency, bureaucratic attitude, red tapism etc. I mean i totally ignored the theory and just gave a practical example of how i would solve it. :|

    Please everyone feel free to point out more mistakes. :|
    The biggest mistake you did was, your obsession towards rules and procedures. The real intent of a "public" servant is to side with the public not with rules. Rules are only a means to an end. The idea is "The existence of the govt. is useless without serving the people who need it". So the thought process should be deliver first, verification later as this is an exceptional case. Red-tapism is head-ache of India and your points were siding with red-tapism
  • edited June 2017
    I got 89/250... I wrote mains a blue moon ago in 2013.. even then my number was not great.... Looking back , I realised cold rationality and practical approach do not help ... My pathologies can be diagnosed with my writing on ' old lady case' ( I wrote in light of my current job experience in Govt. and theories I learnt from book)... I don't remember exactly but I included these points...
    As bureaucrats are creature of law they can't violate it. I have to honour the rules.. I ll see if my discretionary power allow, I ll get her max benefit... Will involve Ngo.. will write file noting of my steps.. and so formality and rule bound approach....
    Yes I forgot the gist of rule and administration to help people ... Even if it is pure noble and theoretical.. I became too practical hence rigid.. that examiner sensed... I might had sounded ' hypocrite and liar' as I don't knew Gandhiji Seven sins but pel diya 7 sin ( I could haVe admitted honestly that I am not able to recall ) .. I think bit by bit examiner stitch our image and award number accordingly.. So I conclude honest, humane and practicable solution must be answer s to ethical questions
  • Bhailog ye qoute pe upsc wale itna q khus hote hai..essay aur ethics me qoute demand karte hai..kisi 3rd person ka qoute unka acha lagta hai..aur jo hum apna orogianal "qoute" 200 word me likhte wo bekar hai....q xhakkar hai ye..mujhe to apna kudh ka ratta mara notes nahi yaad ata exam me ..ye gandhi mandela ka qoute kaha yaad ayega...
    .
    Not true for ethics. Mera ek dost hai. Quote rattne ka boss hai woh and he uses quotes to an unbelievable level in all his ethics answers. Answer writing bhi bohot sahi hai uska. Finally uska 89 aaye. Ek doosra friend hai mera, no quotes at all, simple, lucid, practical and from the heart likha usne. Similar to yo yo choti, 117 aaye.
    Adding to this further. There is a huge difference between 'ethical knowledge' and 'ethical competence'.

    By ethical knowledge i mean that koi bhi kuch bhi rattke likh sakta hai to show his ethical knowledge, lekin you will not get a lot of marks.

    On the other hand, according to the 2nd principal,.. i.e- ethical competence, don't complicate matters too much, dil se likho with a positive outlook. I can guarantee that you will get above average marks, provided that aapka english sahi hai and you have at least some basic flair to string together sentences in a coherent manner. And by saying english being good, i do NOT mean using bombastic words. Ekdom simple and chill rahne ka.
    84p1
    74p2
    94p3
    72p4
    Itne badw baiman nahi hu yaar...i was expecting 100+..almost i was on line of choti singh way of dealing with case study..mention many example..like singur land issue.... bachan sahab use in SBA persuaion q..public liability act in water pollution..voluntary sector act 2007...and many more...i dont wat the f**k they want...
    @raj87 Brother, its not same.
    Many candidates have same points infact same level of thinking as sources are same many of the times or overall evolution.
    But there is definitely one thing that differentiates is structural arrangment of ideas so that reader make most sense of it and like it. (For e.g. quote likhne se utna imapct nahi padta jitna sahi jagah par likhne se padta hai)
    Thats where the difference in marks come amongst many candidates with same level of information thinking or ideation.
    I myself scored miserably in 2015 (81).
    Despite knowing all things and writing them but after results i reanalysed wat could be wrong.
    This time my score was 107.(which is neither great nor bad).but i think i still got more marks than 2015 despite fact that i attempted all questions in 2015.in 2016 i was not able to answer two 10 markers.
    Thanks bhailog ..for enlighten me..What u did to improve ur score...which basic material you refer..choti singh aap nhi kuch batao ..yaar..i m afraid that this mains is going to be a knockout match..if i m out then i m out from upsc game...
  • Bhailog ye qoute pe upsc wale itna q khus hote hai..essay aur ethics me qoute demand karte hai..kisi 3rd person ka qoute unka acha lagta hai..aur jo hum apna orogianal "qoute" 200 word me likhte wo bekar hai....q xhakkar hai ye..mujhe to apna kudh ka ratta mara notes nahi yaad ata exam me ..ye gandhi mandela ka qoute kaha yaad ayega...
    .
    Not true for ethics. Mera ek dost hai. Quote rattne ka boss hai woh and he uses quotes to an unbelievable level in all his ethics answers. Answer writing bhi bohot sahi hai uska. Finally uska 89 aaye. Ek doosra friend hai mera, no quotes at all, simple, lucid, practical and from the heart likha usne. Similar to yo yo choti, 117 aaye.
    Adding to this further. There is a huge difference between 'ethical knowledge' and 'ethical competence'.

    By ethical knowledge i mean that koi bhi kuch bhi rattke likh sakta hai to show his ethical knowledge, lekin you will not get a lot of marks.

    On the other hand, according to the 2nd principal,.. i.e- ethical competence, don't complicate matters too much, dil se likho with a positive outlook. I can guarantee that you will get above average marks, provided that aapka english sahi hai and you have at least some basic flair to string together sentences in a coherent manner. And by saying english being good, i do NOT mean using bombastic words. Ekdom simple and chill rahne ka.
    84p1
    74p2
    94p3
    72p4
    Itne badw baiman nahi hu yaar...i was expecting 100+..almost i was on line of choti singh way of dealing with case study..mention many example..like singur land issue.... bachan sahab use in SBA persuaion q..public liability act in water pollution..voluntary sector act 2007...and many more...i dont wat the f**k they want...
    @raj87 Brother, its not same.
    Many candidates have same points infact same level of thinking as sources are same many of the times or overall evolution.
    But there is definitely one thing that differentiates is structural arrangment of ideas so that reader make most sense of it and like it. (For e.g. quote likhne se utna imapct nahi padta jitna sahi jagah par likhne se padta hai)
    Thats where the difference in marks come amongst many candidates with same level of information thinking or ideation.
    I myself scored miserably in 2015 (81).
    Despite knowing all things and writing them but after results i reanalysed wat could be wrong.
    This time my score was 107.(which is neither great nor bad).but i think i still got more marks than 2015 despite fact that i attempted all questions in 2015.in 2016 i was not able to answer two 10 markers.
    Thanks bhailog ..for enlighten me..What u did to improve ur score...which basic material you refer..choti singh aap nhi kuch batao ..yaar..i m afraid that this mains is going to be a knockout match..if i m out then i m out from upsc game...
    Maine terminologies definitions ache se kiye.taki wo part bakar na lage examiner ko.
    Second i read and solved daily one case studies in last 100 days before exam.
    Tried to correct all mistakes and while writing tried to give struture rather than writing down bla bla
  • Q.1 Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct so as to make it conducive to civilized social existence. (a) Discuss how they achieve this objective. (b) Giving examples, show how the two differ in their approaches.


    Q.2 Explain how ethics contributes to social and human well-being.


    Q.3 Anger is a harmful negative emotion. It is injurious to both personal life and work life. (a) Discuss how it leads to negative emotions and undesirable behaviours. (b) How can it be managed and controlled?



    Try to write these CSE 16 GS4 Questions.. preferably on hard copy and in 8 minutes ! :)

    Let's Learn Together !!!
  • .2 Explain how ethics contributes to social and human well-being.
    Aristotle says that happiness is the ultimate human goal.And Ethics is the path that leads to it.It leads to the happiness of the society as well as the individual.
    -Humans are also social animals therefore it is natural for us to be good and act good.Thus acting ethically makes us happy.

    -The values such as harmony ,peace,compassion,tolerance makes possible that we are able to live together.Eg:India is a diverse nation and these values are deeply within us.
    -It reduces conflict and brings about cooperation.Eg:United Nations was formed to resolve conflict.

    -Environmental ethics helps us to live in harmony with nature.Eg:Indian civilization is one of the oldest but could live in harmony with nature without destroying it for selfish purposes.

    -Ethics also helps us in identifying the ethical issues in the fast changing society and be able to resolve them so that humanity always trump over economics,exigencies,vested interests.Eg:surrogacy,Euthnasia ,human cloning etc.
    PS-please review.

  • Q) Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct so as to make it conducive to civilised social existence (a) Discuss How they achieve this objective (b) Giving Example show How the two differs in their approaches.

    Ans : Law try to achieve the goal of the civilised social existence by
    (a) Treating ceratin acts illegal. Illegal acts are punished by the Judiciary.
    (b) In this way it also brinngs deterrance to some acts which can disturb the peace and harmony of Harmonised society ex UAPA( Unlawful activities prevention acts)
    (c) There ar various enabling legislation for the weaker section of the society like Reservation for SC/ST/OBC and Anti Dowry Act etc
    (d) Law aims to protect individual fundamental rights like freedom,euality etc. At the same Time Social Harmony is ensured by Laws through specific legislation ex 153 A of IPC
    (e) Machinary like direct periodic election to legislature, Judicial Review , Constitutional Amendment , Appealte mechanism in Judiciary , Rule of Law aims to reform Law to achieve the objective of the progressive society.

    Ethics try to achieve the objetive of civilised society by
    (a) Helping Individual to make right decision.
    (b) Enculcating a Norm and Value of Moral Conducts in the society.
    (c) Enriching Culture
    (d) Helping in reforming and Enacting progressive legislations
    (e) Helping in adminsitrative reform etc
    Let us take the example of the problem of child labour in India.
    We have Child Labour Prohibition act in this connection. But it is very poorly implemented. This act have enough deterrence but poor socio-cultural sanction for this led to the poor implementation.
    Ethics can provide rational and emotional resolution for the child labour abolition. It can also bring in supporting socio-cultural change. Which can alone led to the abolition of child labour in India and world.
    In this way we see that law without supporting ethical society and culture leds to poor implementation. If a synthesis between the two is done we can expect transformation of our society.
  • Kindly Review

    Q.1 Law and ethics are considered to be the two tools for controlling human conduct so as to make it conducive to civilized social existence. (a) Discuss how they achieve this objective. (b) Giving examples, show how the two differ in their approaches.

Sign In or Join to comment.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google