INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

What is the Expected Cut off for UPSC Prelims 2017?

13435373940195

Comments

  • Brother jb entire Q rs tripathi book ke paragraph s uthaya gya hai, whats the point of quoting basham or any other source. The examiner has prepared the Q from this passage itself.
    No evidence word is used in statement 1 of the IVC Q as well.
    Now there is a tweaking theory going on that examiner has tweaked the statement in IVC , In Cabinet "to the people" as well. General approach always prevails in such Qs.
    where is " no evidence" in it??
    By that logic... Every source put up to support evidence of horse remains either say inconclusive or disputed... So where is evidence then..
  • Brother jb entire Q rs tripathi book ke paragraph s uthaya gya hai, whats the point of quoting basham or any other source. The examiner has prepared the Q from this passage itself.
    No evidence word is used in statement 1 of the IVC Q as well.
    Now there is a tweaking theory going on that examiner has tweaked the statement in IVC , In Cabinet "to the people" as well. General approach always prevails in such Qs.
    where is " no evidence" in it??
    By that logic... Every source put up to support evidence of horse remains either say inconclusive or disputed... So where is evidence then..
    bhai baat ko samjho. Leftist reject the evidence as inconclusive. whereas rightist accept it as horse evidence. Read makhan lal. Also if you need a neutral view go and read Al-basham.
  • horse, dpsp and butterfly surely wrong
  • Brother jb entire Q rs tripathi book ke paragraph s uthaya gya hai, whats the point of quoting basham or any other source. The examiner has prepared the Q from this passage itself.
    No evidence word is used in statement 1 of the IVC Q as well.
    Now there is a tweaking theory going on that examiner has tweaked the statement in IVC , In Cabinet "to the people" as well. General approach always prevails in such Qs.
    +1
  • Brother jb entire Q rs tripathi book ke paragraph s uthaya gya hai, whats the point of quoting basham or any other source. The examiner has prepared the Q from this passage itself.
    No evidence word is used in statement 1 of the IVC Q as well.
    Now there is a tweaking theory going on that examiner has tweaked the statement in IVC , In Cabinet "to the people" as well. General approach always prevails in such Qs.
    Itna simple nahi hai.... 2nd aur 3rd dono statements tweaked hai.... isliye dono galat hai... sirf pehla statement verbatim hai
  • Brother jb entire Q rs tripathi book ke paragraph s uthaya gya hai, whats the point of quoting basham or any other source. The examiner has prepared the Q from this passage itself.
    No evidence word is used in statement 1 of the IVC Q as well.
    Now there is a tweaking theory going on that examiner has tweaked the statement in IVC , In Cabinet "to the people" as well. General approach always prevails in such Qs.
    Itna simple nahi hai.... 2nd aur 3rd dono statements tweaked hai.... isliye dono galat hai... sirf pehla statement verbatim hai
    completely wrong..... first statement is also tweaked
    http://m.timesofindia.com/india/NCERT-books-by-Prof-Lal-full-of-errors/articleshow/440190.cms
    aapke pyaare makan lal.... zindagi mein kabhi naam nhi suna hoga tumne aur ab reference de rho uski ncert ka
  • Brother jb entire Q rs tripathi book ke paragraph s uthaya gya hai, whats the point of quoting basham or any other source. The examiner has prepared the Q from this passage itself.
    No evidence word is used in statement 1 of the IVC Q as well.
    Now there is a tweaking theory going on that examiner has tweaked the statement in IVC , In Cabinet "to the people" as well. General approach always prevails in such Qs.
    bhai log nhi manenge ki unka ans galat hai..... major coachings have given 1&3....let these people live in false reality
  • is thread be discussion kyu? info rehne do yaha
  • Brother jb entire Q rs tripathi book ke paragraph s uthaya gya hai, whats the point of quoting basham or any other source. The examiner has prepared the Q from this passage itself.
    No evidence word is used in statement 1 of the IVC Q as well.
    Now there is a tweaking theory going on that examiner has tweaked the statement in IVC , In Cabinet "to the people" as well. General approach always prevails in such Qs.
    where is " no evidence" in it??
    By that logic... Every source put up to support evidence of horse remains either say inconclusive or disputed... So where is evidence then..
    bhai baat ko samjho. Leftist reject the evidence as inconclusive. whereas rightist accept it as horse evidence. Read makhan lal. Also if you need a neutral view go and read Al-basham.
    Yep i hv come across that as well .. Leftist.. Rightist... Thing.... Whatever u've said i seen it... Even those who support said "may be".... And certainly doesn't talk about their awareness about the damn horse..tripathy wrote that they are "unfamiliar" now u may argue that is not "unaware"... It's up to u.
  • Brother jb entire Q rs tripathi book ke paragraph s uthaya gya hai, whats the point of quoting basham or any other source. The examiner has prepared the Q from this passage itself.
    No evidence word is used in statement 1 of the IVC Q as well.
    Now there is a tweaking theory going on that examiner has tweaked the statement in IVC , In Cabinet "to the people" as well. General approach always prevails in such Qs.
    Itna simple nahi hai.... 2nd aur 3rd dono statements tweaked hai.... isliye dono galat hai... sirf pehla statement verbatim hai
    completely wrong..... first statement is also tweaked
    http://m.timesofindia.com/india/NCERT-books-by-Prof-Lal-full-of-errors/articleshow/440190.cms
    aapke pyaare makan lal.... zindagi mein kabhi naam nhi suna hoga tumne aur ab reference de rho uski ncert ka
    Bhai Romilla and habib are extrme communist historians. they totally disagree to any rightist hsitorian. Plot samjho and ye dekho

    Similarly, in page 80 the author says, "It (Harappan civilisation) developed in Pakistan, southern Afghan-istan...." Habib argues there is no Harappan site in southern Afghanistan.

    Jao dekh lo Mundigak in southern afghanistan is a harappan site.


This discussion has been closed.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google