INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

UPSC PRELIMS 2017 Question Paper Discussion

1377378380382383792

Comments

  • What should be a safe score for ifos this year ?..120+?
  • https://books.google.co.in/books?id=oAo1X2eagywC&pg=PA189&lpg=PA189&dq=secretary+of+state+british+india+1927&source=bl&ots=-yI9y2dRY9&sig=GZk9GXu2K3M6IYLXXM0877sjEIY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizz97i2s7UAhVIuI8KHUMtCdkQ6AEIPzAF#v=onepage&q=secretary of state british india 1927&f=false


    Look at this one regarding Butler committee. It says the princely states should be transferred to British India and NOT to an Indian Government or (Government of India) as mentioned in the ALL the keys as well.

    Butler Committee report answer is NOT Indian states and Government of India.

    I think it's time to throw away spectrum and pick up Pearson General studies.
    At that time Government of India meant the Government of British India only. GoI Act 1919/1935 were not named as GoBI Acts.
    No other choices of the question is even close for Butler report.
    British India and Government of India are NOT the same. The source is CLEARLY stating that the states are NOT to be under any Indian Government that will be formed (Which is Government of India). It gives power to the Viceroy of India as the person responsible for states representing the crown. The option which states defining the power of secretary of state for India is the closest.
    yeh aya launda .....ek number bhaiii ...kahan se lae itna tagda zeher
    Ohhh Teri.... -2.66 humbly accepted!
    Harcourt Butler Committee A three -member committee headed by Harcourt Butler, appointed on December 16, 1927 to examine the relations between the native states and the paramount power, declined to define what paramountcy was but clearly and fortrightly stated that “paramountcy must remain paramount”. The committee fully endorsed that the viceroy, not the governor general should remain the Crown agent in dealing with the native states. In fact the right to protect includes right to internal intervention. Paramountcy is the supreme sovereign power which was kept above the reach of law and interpretation, to be exercised at the appropriate time subject to resiraints of morality and constitutional propriety against an erring ruler of a native statewhen other correctional means had proved to be futile. It is a concept developed into a deterrent in the political relation between the British and the Indian rulers
    http://www.gktoday.in/quiz-questions/with-reference-to-the-relations-of-the-princely-states-with-british-crown-which-among-the-following-report-said-that-paramountcy-must-remain-paramount/

    this shows it intend to define the jurisdiction of the Central and Provincial Governments





    How did you derive Central and Provincial logic from this? Thoda thoh socho yaar.



    no concept of indian states at that time ...only princely state and british indian states..it became tool for poltical intervention and gradually as detterent in relation between between the British and the Indian rulers..how come its ojective was to improve relations..stated object was to define paramountcy must remain paramount...
    as per insight..
    the link they have posted
    http://tinyurl.com/yatpetz2
    in which it clearly states relationship of british states with crown and not govt of india
    Bhai aisa tatti logic kaha se laate ho?
  • https://books.google.co.in/books?id=oAo1X2eagywC&pg=PA189&lpg=PA189&dq=secretary+of+state+british+india+1927&source=bl&ots=-yI9y2dRY9&sig=GZk9GXu2K3M6IYLXXM0877sjEIY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizz97i2s7UAhVIuI8KHUMtCdkQ6AEIPzAF#v=onepage&q=secretary of state british india 1927&f=false


    Look at this one regarding Butler committee. It says the princely states should be transferred to British India and NOT to an Indian Government or (Government of India) as mentioned in the ALL the keys as well.

    Butler Committee report answer is NOT Indian states and Government of India.

    I think it's time to throw away spectrum and pick up Pearson General studies.
    At that time Government of India meant the Government of British India only. GoI Act 1919/1935 were not named as GoBI Acts.
    No other choices of the question is even close for Butler report.
    British India and Government of India are NOT the same. The source is CLEARLY stating that the states are NOT to be under any Indian Government that will be formed (Which is Government of India). It gives power to the Viceroy of India as the person responsible for states representing the crown. The option which states defining the power of secretary of state for India is the closest.
    yeh aya launda .....ek number bhaiii ...kahan se lae itna tagda zeher
    Ohhh Teri.... -2.66 humbly accepted!
    Harcourt Butler Committee A three -member committee headed by Harcourt Butler, appointed on December 16, 1927 to examine the relations between the native states and the paramount power, declined to define what paramountcy was but clearly and fortrightly stated that “paramountcy must remain paramount”. The committee fully endorsed that the viceroy, not the governor general should remain the Crown agent in dealing with the native states. In fact the right to protect includes right to internal intervention. Paramountcy is the supreme sovereign power which was kept above the reach of law and interpretation, to be exercised at the appropriate time subject to resiraints of morality and constitutional propriety against an erring ruler of a native statewhen other correctional means had proved to be futile. It is a concept developed into a deterrent in the political relation between the British and the Indian rulers
    http://www.gktoday.in/quiz-questions/with-reference-to-the-relations-of-the-princely-states-with-british-crown-which-among-the-following-report-said-that-paramountcy-must-remain-paramount/

    this shows it intend to define the jurisdiction of the Central and Provincial Governments





    How did you derive Central and Provincial logic from this? Thoda thoh socho yaar.



    no concept of indian states at that time ...only princely state and british indian states..it became tool for poltical intervention and gradually as detterent in relation between between the British and the Indian rulers..how come its ojective was to improve relations..stated object was to define paramountcy must remain paramount...
    as per insight..
    the link they have posted
    http://tinyurl.com/yatpetz2
    in which it clearly states relationship of british states with crown and not govt of india
    Bhai aisa tatti logic kaha se laate ho?
    see i have given the link as posted by insight in their solution..just go to the link where it clearly mention relationship with crown and not govt of india...
    tatti karte but tatti logic nahi lagate..

  • Cut off range bata do
  • https://books.google.co.in/books?id=oAo1X2eagywC&pg=PA189&lpg=PA189&dq=secretary+of+state+british+india+1927&source=bl&ots=-yI9y2dRY9&sig=GZk9GXu2K3M6IYLXXM0877sjEIY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizz97i2s7UAhVIuI8KHUMtCdkQ6AEIPzAF#v=onepage&q=secretary of state british india 1927&f=false


    Look at this one regarding Butler committee. It says the princely states should be transferred to British India and NOT to an Indian Government or (Government of India) as mentioned in the ALL the keys as well.

    Butler Committee report answer is NOT Indian states and Government of India.

    I think it's time to throw away spectrum and pick up Pearson General studies.
    At that time Government of India meant the Government of British India only. GoI Act 1919/1935 were not named as GoBI Acts.
    No other choices of the question is even close for Butler report.
    British India and Government of India are NOT the same. The source is CLEARLY stating that the states are NOT to be under any Indian Government that will be formed (Which is Government of India). It gives power to the Viceroy of India as the person responsible for states representing the crown. The option which states defining the power of secretary of state for India is the closest.
    yeh aya launda .....ek number bhaiii ...kahan se lae itna tagda zeher
    Ohhh Teri.... -2.66 humbly accepted!
    Harcourt Butler Committee A three -member committee headed by Harcourt Butler, appointed on December 16, 1927 to examine the relations between the native states and the paramount power, declined to define what paramountcy was but clearly and fortrightly stated that “paramountcy must remain paramount”. The committee fully endorsed that the viceroy, not the governor general should remain the Crown agent in dealing with the native states. In fact the right to protect includes right to internal intervention. Paramountcy is the supreme sovereign power which was kept above the reach of law and interpretation, to be exercised at the appropriate time subject to resiraints of morality and constitutional propriety against an erring ruler of a native statewhen other correctional means had proved to be futile. It is a concept developed into a deterrent in the political relation between the British and the Indian rulers
    http://www.gktoday.in/quiz-questions/with-reference-to-the-relations-of-the-princely-states-with-british-crown-which-among-the-following-report-said-that-paramountcy-must-remain-paramount/

    this shows it intend to define the jurisdiction of the Central and Provincial Governments





    How did you derive Central and Provincial logic from this? Thoda thoh socho yaar.



    no concept of indian states at that time ...only princely state and british indian states..it became tool for poltical intervention and gradually as detterent in relation between between the British and the Indian rulers..how come its ojective was to improve relations..stated object was to define paramountcy must remain paramount...
    as per insight..
    the link they have posted
    http://tinyurl.com/yatpetz2
    in which it clearly states relationship of british states with crown and not govt of india
    Bhai aisa tatti logic kaha se laate ho?
    see i have given the link as posted by insight in their solution..just go to the link where it clearly mention relationship with crown and not govt of india...
    tatti karte but tatti logic nahi lagate..

    Insight ko maaro goli.. seriously agar is exam ki prep Kar rhe ho to pehle NCEART and bipin Chandra padho
  • What is the purpose of setting up of Small Finance Banks (SFBs) in India?

    To supply credit to small business units
    To supply credit to small and marginal farmers
    To encourage young entrepreneurs to set up business particularly in rural areas.


    jab aap small business unit ko credit de rahe ho indirectly encourage hi to kar rahe ho entrepeneur banne ke liye

    had the question was to quote stated objective of sfb..as per rbi then 1 n 2 ...but grand purpose would indirectly also point option 3
  • What is the purpose of setting up of Small Finance Banks (SFBs) in India?

    To supply credit to small business units
    To supply credit to small and marginal farmers
    To encourage young entrepreneurs to set up business particularly in rural areas.


    jab aap small business unit ko credit de rahe ho indirectly encourage hi to kar rahe ho entrepeneur banne ke liye

    had the question was to quote stated objective of sfb..as per rbi then 1 n 2 ...but grand purpose would indirectly also point option 3
    Ye Jo word particularly hai Na.. bas iske karan ye statement wrong h
  • https://books.google.co.in/books?id=oAo1X2eagywC&pg=PA189&lpg=PA189&dq=secretary+of+state+british+india+1927&source=bl&ots=-yI9y2dRY9&sig=GZk9GXu2K3M6IYLXXM0877sjEIY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizz97i2s7UAhVIuI8KHUMtCdkQ6AEIPzAF#v=onepage&q=secretary of state british india 1927&f=false


    Look at this one regarding Butler committee. It says the princely states should be transferred to British India and NOT to an Indian Government or (Government of India) as mentioned in the ALL the keys as well.

    Butler Committee report answer is NOT Indian states and Government of India.

    I think it's time to throw away spectrum and pick up Pearson General studies.
    At that time Government of India meant the Government of British India only. GoI Act 1919/1935 were not named as GoBI Acts.
    No other choices of the question is even close for Butler report.
    British India and Government of India are NOT the same. The source is CLEARLY stating that the states are NOT to be under any Indian Government that will be formed (Which is Government of India). It gives power to the Viceroy of India as the person responsible for states representing the crown. The option which states defining the power of secretary of state for India is the closest.
    yeh aya launda .....ek number bhaiii ...kahan se lae itna tagda zeher
    Ohhh Teri.... -2.66 humbly accepted!
    Harcourt Butler Committee A three -member committee headed by Harcourt Butler, appointed on December 16, 1927 to examine the relations between the native states and the paramount power, declined to define what paramountcy was but clearly and fortrightly stated that “paramountcy must remain paramount”. The committee fully endorsed that the viceroy, not the governor general should remain the Crown agent in dealing with the native states. In fact the right to protect includes right to internal intervention. Paramountcy is the supreme sovereign power which was kept above the reach of law and interpretation, to be exercised at the appropriate time subject to resiraints of morality and constitutional propriety against an erring ruler of a native statewhen other correctional means had proved to be futile. It is a concept developed into a deterrent in the political relation between the British and the Indian rulers
    http://www.gktoday.in/quiz-questions/with-reference-to-the-relations-of-the-princely-states-with-british-crown-which-among-the-following-report-said-that-paramountcy-must-remain-paramount/

    this shows it intend to define the jurisdiction of the Central and Provincial Governments





    How did you derive Central and Provincial logic from this? Thoda thoh socho yaar.



    no concept of indian states at that time ...only princely state and british indian states..it became tool for poltical intervention and gradually as detterent in relation between between the British and the Indian rulers..how come its ojective was to improve relations..stated object was to define paramountcy must remain paramount...
    as per insight..
    the link they have posted
    http://tinyurl.com/yatpetz2
    in which it clearly states relationship of british states with crown and not govt of india
    Bhai aisa tatti logic kaha se laate ho?
    see i have given the link as posted by insight in their solution..just go to the link where it clearly mention relationship with crown and not govt of india...
    tatti karte but tatti logic nahi lagate..

    Insight ko maaro goli.. seriously agar is exam ki prep Kar rhe ho to pehle NCEART and bipin Chandra padho
    brother..just tell me ..relationship of paramount power with princely states....does paramount power point to"govt of india"...no..it tried to refer to crown..

This discussion has been closed.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google