INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

UPSC PRELIMS 2017 Question Paper Discussion

1376377379381382792

Comments

  • https://books.google.co.in/books?id=oAo1X2eagywC&pg=PA189&lpg=PA189&dq=secretary+of+state+british+india+1927&source=bl&ots=-yI9y2dRY9&sig=GZk9GXu2K3M6IYLXXM0877sjEIY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizz97i2s7UAhVIuI8KHUMtCdkQ6AEIPzAF#v=onepage&q=secretary of state british india 1927&f=false


    Look at this one regarding Butler committee. It says the princely states should be transferred to British India and NOT to an Indian Government or (Government of India) as mentioned in the ALL the keys as well.

    Butler Committee report answer is NOT Indian states and Government of India.

    I think it's time to throw away spectrum and pick up Pearson General studies.
    At that time Government of India meant the Government of British India only. GoI Act 1919/1935 were not named as GoBI Acts.
    No other choices of the question is even close for Butler report.
    British India and Government of India are NOT the same. The source is CLEARLY stating that the states are NOT to be under any Indian Government that will be formed (Which is Government of India). It gives power to the Viceroy of India as the person responsible for states representing the crown. The option which states defining the power of secretary of state for India is the closest.
    yeh aya launda .....ek number bhaiii ...kahan se lae itna tagda zeher
    Bhai, looks like UPSC directly question Pearson Manual se hi uthaya and obviously put the trap answer and hid the right answer in the garb of something else. I think they really tried their best to make the questions really tough to narrow down.

    So convinced that Shankar ka answer galat hai na?

    Saala is question m bhi doubt hai logo ko.. bhala ho is desh ka
  • Mujhe coaching walo ka bhi khel samajh aa rha hai
    Vision is starting a mains crash course in july 1st week toh unhone cut off 105 de diya
    Chanakya and Vajiram are starting their foundation courses in july toh unhone cutoff 115 ka diya hai

    Asli figure mere hisaab se 105-09 mein hogi
  • https://books.google.co.in/books?id=oAo1X2eagywC&pg=PA189&lpg=PA189&dq=secretary+of+state+british+india+1927&source=bl&ots=-yI9y2dRY9&sig=GZk9GXu2K3M6IYLXXM0877sjEIY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizz97i2s7UAhVIuI8KHUMtCdkQ6AEIPzAF#v=onepage&q=secretary of state british india 1927&f=false


    Look at this one regarding Butler committee. It says the princely states should be transferred to British India and NOT to an Indian Government or (Government of India) as mentioned in the ALL the keys as well.

    Butler Committee report answer is NOT Indian states and Government of India.

    I think it's time to throw away spectrum and pick up Pearson General studies.
    At that time Government of India meant the Government of British India only. GoI Act 1919/1935 were not named as GoBI Acts.
    No other choices of the question is even close for Butler report.
    British India and Government of India are NOT the same. The source is CLEARLY stating that the states are NOT to be under any Indian Government that will be formed (Which is Government of India). It gives power to the Viceroy of India as the person responsible for states representing the crown. The option which states defining the power of secretary of state for India is the closest.
    yeh aya launda .....ek number bhaiii ...kahan se lae itna tagda zeher
    Ohhh Teri.... -2.66 humbly accepted!
    Harcourt Butler Committee A three -member committee headed by Harcourt Butler, appointed on December 16, 1927 to examine the relations between the native states and the paramount power, declined to define what paramountcy was but clearly and fortrightly stated that “paramountcy must remain paramount”. The committee fully endorsed that the viceroy, not the governor general should remain the Crown agent in dealing with the native states. In fact the right to protect includes right to internal intervention. Paramountcy is the supreme sovereign power which was kept above the reach of law and interpretation, to be exercised at the appropriate time subject to resiraints of morality and constitutional propriety against an erring ruler of a native statewhen other correctional means had proved to be futile. It is a concept developed into a deterrent in the political relation between the British and the Indian rulers
    http://www.gktoday.in/quiz-questions/with-reference-to-the-relations-of-the-princely-states-with-british-crown-which-among-the-following-report-said-that-paramountcy-must-remain-paramount/

    this shows it intend to define the jurisdiction of the Central and Provincial GovernmentsNative States aka Princley States





    Sahi hai Bhai lage raho
    Mere 2.66 badh gaye
    firse -2.66 karlo... dhyaan se padho ...isme likha hai native states not provincial governments... british india comprised of central govt, provincial states ruled by british governors and princley (native) states that were ruled by native rulers subject to paramountcy... dhyaan se padha karo likha kya hai...
  • https://books.google.co.in/books?id=oAo1X2eagywC&pg=PA189&lpg=PA189&dq=secretary+of+state+british+india+1927&source=bl&ots=-yI9y2dRY9&sig=GZk9GXu2K3M6IYLXXM0877sjEIY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizz97i2s7UAhVIuI8KHUMtCdkQ6AEIPzAF#v=onepage&q=secretary of state british india 1927&f=false


    Look at this one regarding Butler committee. It says the princely states should be transferred to British India and NOT to an Indian Government or (Government of India) as mentioned in the ALL the keys as well.

    Butler Committee report answer is NOT Indian states and Government of India.

    I think it's time to throw away spectrum and pick up Pearson General studies.
    At that time Government of India meant the Government of British India only. GoI Act 1919/1935 were not named as GoBI Acts.
    No other choices of the question is even close for Butler report.
    British India and Government of India are NOT the same. The source is CLEARLY stating that the states are NOT to be under any Indian Government that will be formed (Which is Government of India). It gives power to the Viceroy of India as the person responsible for states representing the crown. The option which states defining the power of secretary of state for India is the closest.
    yeh aya launda .....ek number bhaiii ...kahan se lae itna tagda zeher
    Ohhh Teri.... -2.66 humbly accepted!
    Harcourt Butler Committee A three -member committee headed by Harcourt Butler, appointed on December 16, 1927 to examine the relations between the native states and the paramount power, declined to define what paramountcy was but clearly and fortrightly stated that “paramountcy must remain paramount”. The committee fully endorsed that the viceroy, not the governor general should remain the Crown agent in dealing with the native states. In fact the right to protect includes right to internal intervention. Paramountcy is the supreme sovereign power which was kept above the reach of law and interpretation, to be exercised at the appropriate time subject to resiraints of morality and constitutional propriety against an erring ruler of a native statewhen other correctional means had proved to be futile. It is a concept developed into a deterrent in the political relation between the British and the Indian rulers
    http://www.gktoday.in/quiz-questions/with-reference-to-the-relations-of-the-princely-states-with-british-crown-which-among-the-following-report-said-that-paramountcy-must-remain-paramount/

    this shows it intend to define the jurisdiction of the Central and Provincial Governments





    How did you derive Central and Provincial logic from this? Thoda thoh socho yaar.



    no concept of indian states at that time ...only princely state and british indian states..it became tool for poltical intervention and gradually as detterent in relation between between the British and the Indian rulers..how come its ojective was to improve relations..stated object was to define paramountcy must remain paramount...
  • Lytton passed Vernacular Act in 1878. Butler committee/report around 1928. Exactly 50 years is the difference. Both Butler and Lytton were white. Coincidence? I think not.

    Censorship on national press is the right option.
  • Is it not a crime to set such stupid paper including two right answers in a same question?unfortunately ,we could do nothing except mourning.
  • ab toh lag raha hai forum wale har question ka alternate answer nikal liya hai....
  • as per insight..
    the link they have posted
    http://tinyurl.com/yatpetz2
    in which it clearly states relationship of british states with crown and not govt of india
  • https://books.google.co.in/books?id=oAo1X2eagywC&pg=PA189&lpg=PA189&dq=secretary+of+state+british+india+1927&source=bl&ots=-yI9y2dRY9&sig=GZk9GXu2K3M6IYLXXM0877sjEIY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizz97i2s7UAhVIuI8KHUMtCdkQ6AEIPzAF#v=onepage&q=secretary of state british india 1927&f=false


    Look at this one regarding Butler committee. It says the princely states should be transferred to British India and NOT to an Indian Government or (Government of India) as mentioned in the ALL the keys as well.

    Butler Committee report answer is NOT Indian states and Government of India.

    I think it's time to throw away spectrum and pick up Pearson General studies.
    At that time Government of India meant the Government of British India only. GoI Act 1919/1935 were not named as GoBI Acts.
    No other choices of the question is even close for Butler report.
    British India and Government of India are NOT the same. The source is CLEARLY stating that the states are NOT to be under any Indian Government that will be formed (Which is Government of India). It gives power to the Viceroy of India as the person responsible for states representing the crown. The option which states defining the power of secretary of state for India is the closest.
    yeh aya launda .....ek number bhaiii ...kahan se lae itna tagda zeher
    Ohhh Teri.... -2.66 humbly accepted!
    Harcourt Butler Committee A three -member committee headed by Harcourt Butler, appointed on December 16, 1927 to examine the relations between the native states and the paramount power, declined to define what paramountcy was but clearly and fortrightly stated that “paramountcy must remain paramount”. The committee fully endorsed that the viceroy, not the governor general should remain the Crown agent in dealing with the native states. In fact the right to protect includes right to internal intervention. Paramountcy is the supreme sovereign power which was kept above the reach of law and interpretation, to be exercised at the appropriate time subject to resiraints of morality and constitutional propriety against an erring ruler of a native statewhen other correctional means had proved to be futile. It is a concept developed into a deterrent in the political relation between the British and the Indian rulers
    http://www.gktoday.in/quiz-questions/with-reference-to-the-relations-of-the-princely-states-with-british-crown-which-among-the-following-report-said-that-paramountcy-must-remain-paramount/

    this shows it intend to define the jurisdiction of the Central and Provincial Governments





    How did you derive Central and Provincial logic from this? Thoda thoh socho yaar.



    no concept of indian states at that time ...only princely state and british indian states..it became tool for poltical intervention and gradually as detterent in relation between between the British and the Indian rulers..how come its ojective was to improve relations..stated object was to define paramountcy must remain paramount...
    as per insight..
    the link they have posted
    http://tinyurl.com/yatpetz2
    in which it clearly states relationship of british states with crown and not govt of india
  • https://books.google.co.in/books?id=oAo1X2eagywC&pg=PA189&lpg=PA189&dq=secretary+of+state+british+india+1927&source=bl&ots=-yI9y2dRY9&sig=GZk9GXu2K3M6IYLXXM0877sjEIY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizz97i2s7UAhVIuI8KHUMtCdkQ6AEIPzAF#v=onepage&q=secretary of state british india 1927&f=false


    Look at this one regarding Butler committee. It says the princely states should be transferred to British India and NOT to an Indian Government or (Government of India) as mentioned in the ALL the keys as well.

    Butler Committee report answer is NOT Indian states and Government of India.

    I think it's time to throw away spectrum and pick up Pearson General studies.
    At that time Government of India meant the Government of British India only. GoI Act 1919/1935 were not named as GoBI Acts.
    No other choices of the question is even close for Butler report.
    British India and Government of India are NOT the same. The source is CLEARLY stating that the states are NOT to be under any Indian Government that will be formed (Which is Government of India). It gives power to the Viceroy of India as the person responsible for states representing the crown. The option which states defining the power of secretary of state for India is the closest.
    yeh aya launda .....ek number bhaiii ...kahan se lae itna tagda zeher
    Ohhh Teri.... -2.66 humbly accepted!
    Harcourt Butler Committee A three -member committee headed by Harcourt Butler, appointed on December 16, 1927 to examine the relations between the native states and the paramount power, declined to define what paramountcy was but clearly and fortrightly stated that “paramountcy must remain paramount”. The committee fully endorsed that the viceroy, not the governor general should remain the Crown agent in dealing with the native states. In fact the right to protect includes right to internal intervention. Paramountcy is the supreme sovereign power which was kept above the reach of law and interpretation, to be exercised at the appropriate time subject to resiraints of morality and constitutional propriety against an erring ruler of a native statewhen other correctional means had proved to be futile. It is a concept developed into a deterrent in the political relation between the British and the Indian rulers
    http://www.gktoday.in/quiz-questions/with-reference-to-the-relations-of-the-princely-states-with-british-crown-which-among-the-following-report-said-that-paramountcy-must-remain-paramount/

    this shows it intend to define the jurisdiction of the Central and Provincial Governments





    How did you derive Central and Provincial logic from this? Thoda thoh socho yaar.



    no concept of indian states at that time ...only princely state and british indian states..it became tool for poltical intervention and gradually as detterent in relation between between the British and the Indian rulers..how come its ojective was to improve relations..stated object was to define paramountcy must remain paramount...
    as per insight..
    the link they have posted
    http://tinyurl.com/yatpetz2
    in which it clearly states relationship of british states with crown and not govt of india

    D cannot be right option..
This discussion has been closed.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google