INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

DISCUSSION: PHILOSOPHY MAINS 2016 PAPER 1 & 2

1679111237

Comments

  • Answer for Sartre's nothingness
    According to sartre consciousness means nothingness
    Therefore only conscious beings have nothingness and it implies lack of something which means human beings decide their essence by fulfilling what they lack i.e to proceed towards a more better stage
    Material objects lacks consciousness and therefore nothingness so no potentiality in them. They lack nothing, they are complete in themselves
    Only human beings have potentiality and they can emerge in new form at any point of time
    They can decide their essence through their actions
    They are free and therefore responsible for authentic and inauthentic existence
    Define these two terms also and refute god also
  • For abhava
    Nyaya has accepted abhava to explain following
    1.impermanent and changeable objects
    2.asatkaryavada i.e absence of effect in its cause before production
    3.liberation i.e absence(abhava) of suffering
    4.samyoga i.e external relations
    After this explain two types of abhava and their subtypes
    Finally write visesana visesaya bhava sannikars
  • For naya and syadvada
    Naya is simply a judgement without any context so not authentic
    If this naya is qualified with syat then it becomes authentic as now context is cleari.e
    The user is accepting that his judgement is true from a particular context and point of time but other user may interpret it differently from other context and point of time
    So syadvada acccepts judgement as authentic in certain context without denying other possibilities
    A square can be a rectangle from other's perspective or may be a line ,all depends on context
    Therefore naya is inauthentic whereas stadvada is authentic
  • Review kr dna bhai logo
    Ye hi sab likha hai paper me
  • Baki questions bhi aise hi likhe h
  • Baki questions bhi aise hi likhe h
    Abahav and nyaya wrote on same lines .I attempted Plato question..plz discuss question 3: Plato, Russell neutral monism..

  • For abhava
    Nyaya has accepted abhava to explain following
    1.impermanent and changeable objects
    2.asatkaryavada i.e absence of effect in its cause before production
    3.liberation i.e absence(abhava) of suffering
    4.samyoga i.e external relations
    After this explain two types of abhava and their subtypes
    Finally write visesana visesaya bhava sannikars
    Here definition of substance according to Vaisesika could be included : substance is that which can be thought and named, substance is the meaning of a word : Abhava satisfies these conditions
  • I have given only outline here otherwise in paper have written everything
  • Russell neutral monism because his aroms are neither conscious like monads neither material like science
    They are neutral and monism because he has explained his theory on the basis of these atoms
    They are the ultimate reality and unanalysable further
    Then explain logical atomism
    Not attempted this but answer should be in this line i think so
  • Paper was analytical
    If attempted properly easy to get 130 plus
Sign In or Join to comment.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google