INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

DISCUSSION: PHILOSOPHY MAINS 2016 PAPER 1 & 2

17810121337

Comments

  • Russell neutral monism because his aroms are neither conscious like monads neither material like science
    They are neutral and monism because he has explained his theory on the basis of these atoms
    They are the ultimate reality and unanalysable further
    Then explain logical atomism
    Not attempted this but answer should be in this line i think so
    In Plato question I have criticised it by Hegel and Aristotle..Hegel said Plato didn't explain the organic relation between ideas and idea of good and also not between transcendental and empirical world..explained this with absolute idea
    In Aristotle..he said his philosophy abstract and used only metaphorical eg to explain matter thus called his philosophy abstract, not able to explain change and dynamism in concrete form and Aristotle explained it with substance potentiality and actuality..
    Sensibility me Plato called this as objects of opinion and lowest form of knowledge.


  • In Plato question I have criticised it by Hegel and Aristotle..Hegel said Plato didn't explain the organic relation between ideas and idea of good and also not between transcendental and empirical world..explained this with absolute idea
    In Aristotle..he said his philosophy abstract and used only metaphorical eg to explain matter thus called his philosophy abstract, not able to explain change and dynamism in concrete form and Aristotle explained it with substance potentiality and actuality..
    Sensibility me Plato called this as objects of opinion and lowest form of knowledge

    Yes u have to write on these lines only




  • In Plato question I have criticised it by Hegel and Aristotle..Hegel said Plato didn't explain the organic relation between ideas and idea of good and also not between transcendental and empirical world..explained this with absolute idea
    In Aristotle..he said his philosophy abstract and used only metaphorical eg to explain matter thus called his philosophy abstract, not able to explain change and dynamism in concrete form and Aristotle explained it with substance potentiality and actuality..
    Sensibility me Plato called this as objects of opinion and lowest form of knowledge

    Yes u have to write on these lines only


    Which attemp bro

  • 3rd
    Pichli bar kitna score tha

  • @upsckamara good answers bhai.. how much you scored last time around ..
  • logical necessity arthapatti waala!!
  • Expecting 250 this time let us see
  • Arthapatti explain first then write that according to mimansakas to reconcile two inconsistent facts perception, inference,vt and comparison not sufficient
    Why they are not sufficient, give reasons for them
    therefore they accepted a new pramana
    In the end write nyaya who has reduced arthapatti into inference
Sign In or Join to comment.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google