INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

'Rights' Movement : CSE-2015' [Final Draft] - Start Sending

1232426282961

Comments

  • A Few questions that we need to consider, especially before we go to meet Baswan and T Jacob. I am not saying that these are the objections that they will raise ,but in any case we should be prepared with answers.

    1. if T Jacob says "this change was only in evaluation and marking and not in syllabus or exam pattern"?

    2.if Baswan says "age has already been increased and is already quite high"?

    please suggest what we should answer. only serious arguments plz.
    See u can say 6 attempts over higher age limit will encourage aspirants carrying experience in various fiels to enter administrative jobs.such experienced and diverse group of officials add new dimensions and ideas to whichever domain they need to serve.


    With increased flexibility in age and attempts aspirants may go for other jobs and education and avoid unemployment in case they fail in UPSC .A candidate with experience may return to job after gap but for a candidate who has huge break without experience may find it tougher to get into jobs!Dont knwo about others but many companies have no more than 2 yrs gap policy for fresher level entry!

    Hope it helps.
  • @srimanbanerjee

    But marking is paramount. If you remove half the syllabus from marking, it means months of wasted efforts, and complete change in strategy .... competitive exams are all abt strategy, you figure out what you can do best, what can get you most marks and then work accordingly but if you change it at last moment then ppl suffer ..... Given that 10 lakh apply and 5 lakh give the exam, you can ask questions in Chinese and still will be able to select 15000 ppl but that doesn't change the fact that the exam process was inherently unfair.


    Age limit is Not high. Most countries do not have age limits to work for govt. our state services have much higher limits. this 30/32 is nothing but a colonial construct whereby we are eliminating a huge chunk of ppl from competing in the exam. Average age of ppl being selected in CSE is going up. (you will have to check the data) ... cost of education is rising.. a mba/mbbs/ engineering degree costs lakhs. ppl work for a few years in the private sector so they can pay off the education loans ... one can argue that why are SC/ST/other categories allowed a higher age limit ? The same reasons that stop them from competing in early 20s also stop general category from competing in early 20s ... families are becoming small, so you have the 1/2 children families whereby one person is now financially responsible for the entire family. he cannot simply sit at home for 4 years without having worked and saved substantially for his family. same reason - cost of living is going up. so need to save before we give the exam. Even preparing for the exam cost huge money. The world has changed but the CSE process and age limits have not changed to reflect that reality.
  • 2 Questions raised by one member and their possible solutions ->

    1. if T Jacob says "this change was only in evaluation and marking and not in syllabus or exam pattern"?

    Possible Answer ->
    We've to PRESENT HIM THIS / similar DOCUMENT - https://goo.gl/lfzAnz

    2.if Baswan says "age has already been increased and is already quite high"? and if we increase MORE as 34 years and attempts as 8 - govt won't be able to reduce it in future

    Possible Answer ->
    We've to ask them to "PUBLISH THIS PRESS RELEASE" - https://goo.gl/Kc0bG6
  • 2 Questions raised by one member and their possible solutions ->

    1. if T Jacob says "this change was only in evaluation and marking and not in syllabus or exam pattern"?

    Possible Answer ->
    We've to PRESENT HIM THIS / similar DOCUMENT - https://goo.gl/lfzAnz

    2.if Baswan says "age has already been increased and is already quite high"? and if we increase MORE as 34 years and attempts as 8 - govt won't be able to reduce it in future

    Possible Answer ->
    We've to ask them to "PUBLISH THIS PRESS RELEASE" - https://goo.gl/Kc0bG6
    How I wish this flowchart was included in our original draft. Really. But it's not late we can show him this when we meet him.

  • BOTH THE DOCUMENTS ARE MADE BY DRAFTING TEAM AND WE HAVE TO "PRESENT THESE DOCUMENTS TO THEM" WHILE MEETING THEM
  • In the diagram posted above, 12.5 % is written by assuming 50 % / 2 = 25 % on next level / 2 = 12.5 % on next level (on merit level)
  • In the diagram posted above, 12.5 % is written by assuming 50 % / 2 = 25 % on next level / 2 = 12.5 % on next level (on merit level)
    the diagrammatic presentation is truly brilliant.

  • BOTH THE DOCUMENTS ARE MADE BY DRAFTING TEAM AND WE HAVE TO "PRESENT THESE DOCUMENTS TO THEM" WHILE MEETING THEM
  • Ok guys i had filed complaint at public grievance i received following note with case as closed.
    From AIS section
    This is a policy matter and such decisions are taken after in depth examination in consultation with all stakeholders. However, your concerns have been noted.
  • Ok guys i had filed complaint at public grievance i received following note with case as closed.
    From AIS section
    This is a policy matter and such decisions are taken after in depth examination in consultation with all stakeholders. However, your concerns have been noted.
    so we shud focus on dopt,pmo n Jitendra singh along with rajnath singh...jo hoga politically hoga.
This discussion has been closed.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google