INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

[Draft Uploaded] Collective Efforts to Demand Extra Age / Attempts for 2015 and 2011-2014 scenarios

1152153155157158207

Comments

  • @doctorgirl @himanshu07 @drharshit why not seperate thread and movement for more intake to?
    will it b fruitfull?

  • For rahul gandhi thing, the below lines are put in the draft -

    Also, out of the two extra attempts provided by the government after 2013 changes, one attempt has been nullified by introducing the changes again in 2015 thus leaving the effective extra attempt to one only. We request the authority and government to restore this wasted 2015 attempt by providing an extra attempt and one year age relaxation.
    One suggestion - "Consequent" Age relaxation could be a more inclusive term to factor in all kinds of people
  • @doctorgirl @himanshu07 @drharshit why not seperate thread and movement for more intake to?
    will it b fruitfull?

    Even if they agree, by the time they do, exam will be on our head. Plus way way too much potential for court cases. why 1000 more, why not 1001 . This one may be a losing battle

  • For rahul gandhi thing, the below lines are put in the draft -

    Also, out of the two extra attempts provided by the government after 2013 changes, one attempt has been nullified by introducing the changes again in 2015 thus leaving the effective extra attempt to one only. We request the authority and government to restore this wasted 2015 attempt by providing an extra attempt and one year age relaxation.
    One suggestion - "Consequent" Age relaxation could be a more inclusive term to factor in all kinds of people
    i think...consequent age relaxation may mean....32 + 1 i.e 33 years which still is not inclusive....its better if we say provide an extra attempt to all candidates who appeared in 2015 irrespective of age or no of attempts..
  • an extra attempt to all candidates who appeared in 2015 "Filled the form in 2015' irrespective of age or no of attempts.. (This part not included) - Because it sends the messages of 7-8 attempts which FEELS TOO MUCH.

    After discussions it is felt that we HAVE TO AVOID ANYTHING WHICH Directly delivers the idea of 7-8 attempts.
  • Bhai...mujhe to upsc keys me bhi locha najar aa raha h....tsunami machayega ye is bar publish hone par.....
  • consequential keyword incorporated
  • an extra attempt to all candidates who appeared in 2015 "Filled the form in 2015' irrespective of age or no of attempts.. (This part not included) - Because it sends the messages of 7-8 attempts which FEELS TOO MUCH.

    After discussions it is felt that we HAVE TO AVOID ANYTHING WHICH Directly delivers the idea of 7-8 attempts.

    @gks Sorry to bug you but does this mean that 2011 ones are being included ?
    Just want to be sure so can mentally prepare myself for disappointment or have some hope left.
  • an extra attempt to all candidates who appeared in 2015 "Filled the form in 2015' irrespective of age or no of attempts.. (This part not included) - Because it sends the messages of 7-8 attempts which FEELS TOO MUCH.
    After discussions it is felt that we HAVE TO AVOID ANYTHING WHICH Directly delivers the idea of 7-8 attempts
    ask for an attempt based on 2011 precedence.Let govt fill in d blank.

  • The best way in my understanding was - 2016 open year but after receiving so many negative reviews about it and strong arguments too by which we were also agreed - we removed 2016 open year paragraph.
This discussion has been closed.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google