INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

[Draft Uploaded] Collective Efforts to Demand Extra Age / Attempts for 2015 and 2011-2014 scenarios

1130131133135136207

Comments

  • @simr_2015

    OUR CONCERN
    We would like to bring to your notice the GROSS INJUSTICE done
    to us (UPSC CSE 2015 candidates) by bringing changes to the
    examination process JUST THREE MONTHS before the exam.
    Here’s how we have been victims of INJUSTICE :
    • UPSC CSE Preliminary Examination have always consisted of two
    papers with a total of 270 questions (before 2011) and 180
    questions( 2011-2014) to evaluate the merit of candidates .
    But this year (2015) one of the two papers was made only
    ‘qualifying’ in nature. This means that marks of this paper was
    not added to total marks to decide the selection . As a result only
    100 questions were there to judge the merit of candidates which
    increased the uncertainty in the selection process to an
    unprecendented level.
    No examination in this country whether engg entrance exams,
    medical entrance exams,SSC, Bank PO,State PCS exams, and so
    on , decide merit on mere 100 questions and that too of same nature
    i.e only General Studies. This amounts to an absolute lack of
    appropriate criteria to judge the merit . If this is not INJUSTICE ,
    then what else is?
    • Any changes in the selection process is the prerogative of the
    concerned authority. But if the change amounts to sheer
    INJUSTICE, then its our right to voice our concern in a democracy.
    A mammoth change was introduced by scrapping 50% of the
    sylllabus by making it merely ‘qualifying’ , just “ THREE MONTHS “
    before the examination. How can one adapt to such a huge change
    at such short notice for an exam which needs AT LEAST ONE
    YEAR of preparation by one and all. If this is not INJUSTICE , then
    what else is?
    • There were several candidates who had exhausted all their
    attempts due to far-fetched changes introduced in the exam
    process since 2011. As a compensation, they were given an extra
    attempt this year. But introducing changes just THREE MONTHS
    before the exam marred their chances . So giving an extra attempt
    was made null and void by brnging such changes. If this is not
    INJUSTICE, then what else is?
    WHAT DO WE WANT ?
    In the wake of the GROSS INJUSTICE done to us ( UPSC CSE 2015
    aspirants), we request/demand AN EXTRA ATTEMPT for all of us
    who appeared in 2015. This is the least correction that can be
    done to address the great harm done to us which have put in us
    deep turmoil and despair.
    Also, any changes in the examination process must be informed to us at least one year before the examination to give us ample time to adapt to the changes.
    Our demands would not lead to any law &order problem, nor would
    lead to any burden on the state exchequer, neither would it harm the
    interests of anyone. It would only lead to betterment of all those
    who want to serve the nation .It conforms to the core principles
    of DEMOCRACY. Hope democracy wins again.
  • @simr_2015

    OUR CONCERN
    We would like to bring to your notice the GROSS INJUSTICE done
    to us (UPSC CSE 2015 candidates) by bringing changes to the
    examination process JUST THREE MONTHS before the exam.
    Here’s how we have been victims of INJUSTICE :
    • UPSC CSE Preliminary Examination have always consisted of two
    papers with a total of 270 questions (before 2011) and 180
    questions( 2011-2014) to evaluate the merit of candidates .
    But this year (2015) one of the two papers was made only
    ‘qualifying’ in nature. This means that marks of this paper was
    not added to total marks to decide the selection . As a result only
    100 questions were there to judge the merit of candidates which
    increased the uncertainty in the selection process to an
    unprecendented level.
    No examination in this country whether engg entrance exams,
    medical entrance exams,SSC, Bank PO,State PCS exams, and so
    on , decide merit on mere 100 questions and that too of same nature
    i.e only General Studies. This amounts to an absolute lack of
    appropriate criteria to judge the merit . If this is not INJUSTICE ,
    then what else is?
    • Any changes in the selection process is the prerogative of the
    concerned authority. But if the change amounts to sheer
    INJUSTICE, then its our right to voice our concern in a democracy.
    A mammoth change was introduced by scrapping 50% of the
    sylllabus by making it merely ‘qualifying’ , just “ THREE MONTHS “
    before the examination. How can one adapt to such a huge change
    at such short notice for an exam which needs AT LEAST ONE
    YEAR of preparation by one and all. If this is not INJUSTICE , then
    what else is?
    • There were several candidates who had exhausted all their
    attempts due to far-fetched changes introduced in the exam
    process since 2011. As a compensation, they were given an extra
    attempt this year. But introducing changes just THREE MONTHS
    before the exam marred their chances . So giving an extra attempt
    was made null and void by brnging such changes. If this is not
    INJUSTICE, then what else is?
    WHAT DO WE WANT ?
    In the wake of the GROSS INJUSTICE done to us ( UPSC CSE 2015
    aspirants), we request/demand AN EXTRA ATTEMPT for all of us
    who appeared in 2015. This is the least correction that can be
    done to address the great harm done to us which have put in us
    deep turmoil and despair.
    Also, any changes in the examination process must be informed to us at least one year before the examination to give us ample time to adapt to the changes.
    Our demands would not lead to any law &order problem, nor would
    lead to any burden on the state exchequer, neither would it harm the
    interests of anyone. It would only lead to betterment of all those
    who want to serve the nation .It conforms to the core principles
    of DEMOCRACY. Hope democracy wins again.
    Hey sounds good! I ll get opinion of some non upsc people to see the impact of this draft,u too can tk feedback and it ll be good if it is posted on FB group( i still need to join that) and ask more drafts from people.we can choose finalise and start the campaign!!

    Now we have rajya sabha lok sabha routes as well so there are many mediums to take our voice to common people as well as to lawmakers! We need to have some deadline though!
  • All of us here,who r supporting the cause and are ready to do anything ,share ur contact number with @InGamble2016 .Very few people are needed,but only a committed lot can see us through.Dont shy away..every headcount matters.
  • All of us here,who r supporting the cause and are ready to do anything ,share ur contact number with @InGamble2016 .Very few people are needed,but only a committed lot can see us through.Dont shy away..every headcount matters.
    @nithy

  • 12 min attempts and age relaxation upto 40 must one of our core demands (credit to Manoj Mane). Due to reasons as follows:
    1.Justice to poor students
    2. Increase popular participation in geovernment as candidates from various backgrounds, region will have time to prepare
    3. Students will be effectively sageguarded from arbitrariness of UPSC, DOPT.
    4. the dictatorship of officers entered thru UPSC in government departments will effectively end.
    5. Corruption will also end as other avenues of growth will open up and coercion on staff by officers will be effectively reduced and so on
  • age relaxation up to 40 for general....hahahaaaa..
  • age relaxation up to 40 for general....hahahaaaa..
    kaise chal rhi hai padhayi dukhiya?
  • Aggrieved candidates may come today evening in Sindhi Park, Rajendra ppace to meet and discuss issues where some conflicting views may appear to be present, thouh as far as I believe they are not in conflict in any way. Thos3 who are coming may count themselves.
    I am : 01
  • Aggrieved candidates may come today evening in Sindhi Park, Rajendra ppace to meet and discuss issues where some conflicting views may appear to be present, thouh as far as I believe they are not in conflict in any way. Thos3 who are coming may count themselves.
    I am : 01
    Give some cntact numbr...n time...how n wen ppl will come..?

  • meanwhile..those interested ,can contact..+919560016946...Manu kumar rajeurs....@Failure's Guide u too synchronise with him.
This discussion has been closed.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google