[Draft Uploaded] Collective Efforts to Demand Extra Age / Attempts for 2015 and 2011-2014 scenarios

Failure'sGuide

Why I want to fight UPSC, DoPT, GoI?
1. Continuous, arbitrary and sudden changes have effectively marred the four (six) attempts given as these were based on different schemes of examination which therefore effectively reduced planning horizon and moreover increased the bias towards students who have more resources to prepare and more leisure to put in necessary effort.
2. Age and attempt restrictions on flimsy ground (as no scientific study supports such restriction) is purely elitist in character as a poor student like me normally starts preparation for this exam once one is settled with some kind of job and thus has enough resources to buy books etc and join some (good, qualified) teacher to withstand competition from richer students or students who have studied with public support in few reputed institutes.
3. Sudden withdrawal of CSAT in 2015 proved to be the worst in the above scheme of examination and therefore merits special mention and immediate resolution. This sudden withdrawal of CSAT is also elitist, contrary to the popular perception. As completing the syllabus of GS paper I i.e. History, Polity, Economy etc requires more resources and time compared to the CSAT paper which checks the aptitude of candidates and therefore doesn’t require any specific preparation.
4. I feel deceived in the end and am determined to fight for the injustice suffered by the irresponsible, unjust and arbitrary decisions of UPSC, DoPT, GoI.

Battle_begins2015

@Failure'sGuide pls be in contact wid@ingamble2016

DUKHIYA

OUR CONCERN
We would like to bring to your notice the GROSS INJUSTICE done
to us (UPSC CSE 2015 candidates) by bringing changes to the
examination process JUST THREE MONTHS before the exam.
Here’s how we have been victims of INJUSTICE :
• UPSC CSE Preliminary Examination have always consisted of two
papers with a total of 250 questions (before 2011) and 180
questions( 2011-2014) to evaluate the merit of candidates .
But this year (2015) one of the two papers was made only
‘qualifying’ in nature. This means that marks of this paper was
not added to total marks to decide the selection . As a result only
100 questions were there to judge the merit of candidates which
increased the uncertainty in the selection process to an
unprecendented level.
No examination in this country whether engg entrance exams,
medical entrance exams,SSC, BANK PO,State PCS exams, and so
on , decide merit on mere 100 questions and that of same nature
i.e only General Studies. This amounts to an absolute lack of
appropriate criteria to judge the merit . If this is not INJUSTICE ,
then what else is?
• Any changes in the selection process is the prerogative of the
concerned authority. But if the change amounts to sheer
INJUSTICE, then its our right to voice our concern in a democracy.
A mammoth change was introduced by scrapping 50% of the
sylllabus by making it merely ‘qualifying’ , just “ THREE MONTHS “
before the examination. How can one adapt to such a huge change
at such short notice for an exam which needs AT LEAST ONE
YEAR of preparation by one and all. If this is not INJUSTICE , then
what else is?
• There were several candidates who had exhausted all their
attempts due to far-fetched changes introduced in the exam
process since 2011. As a compensation, they were given an extra
attempt this year. But introducing changes just THREE MONTHS
before the exam marred their chances . So giving an extra attempt
was made null and void by brnging such changes. If this is not
INJUSTICE, then what else is?
WHAT DO WE WANT ?
In the wake of the GROSS INJUSTICE done to us ( UPSC CSE 2015
aspirants), we request/demand AN EXTRA ATTEMPT for all of us
who appeared in 2015. This is the least correction that can be
done to address the great harm done to us which have put in us
deep turmoil and despair.
Our demand would not lead to any law &order problem, nor would
lead to any burden of state exchequer, neither would it harm the
interests of anyone. It would only lead to betterment of all those
who want to serve the nation .It conforms to the core principles
of DEMOCRACY. Hope democracy wins again.

DUKHIYA

OUR CONCERN
We would like to bring to your notice the GROSS INJUSTICE done
to us (UPSC CSE 2015 candidates) by bringing changes to the
examination process JUST THREE MONTHS before the exam.
Here’s how we have been victims of INJUSTICE :
• UPSC CSE Preliminary Examination have always consisted of two
papers with a total of 250 questions (before 2011) and 180
questions( 2011-2014) to evaluate the merit of candidates .
But this year (2015) one of the two papers was made only
‘qualifying’ in nature. This means that marks of this paper was
not added to total marks to decide the selection . As a result only
100 questions were there to judge the merit of candidates which
increased the uncertainty in the selection process to an
unprecendented level.
No examination in this country whether engg entrance exams,
medical entrance exams,SSC, BANK PO,State PCS exams, and so
on , decide merit on mere 100 questions and that of same nature
i.e only General Studies. This amounts to an absolute lack of
appropriate criteria to judge the merit . If this is not INJUSTICE ,
then what else is?
• Any changes in the selection process is the prerogative of the
concerned authority. But if the change amounts to sheer
INJUSTICE, then its our right to voice our concern in a democracy.
A mammoth change was introduced by scrapping 50% of the
sylllabus by making it merely ‘qualifying’ , just “ THREE MONTHS “
before the examination. How can one adapt to such a huge change
at such short notice for an exam which needs AT LEAST ONE
YEAR of preparation by one and all. If this is not INJUSTICE , then
what else is?
• There were several candidates who had exhausted all their
attempts due to far-fetched changes introduced in the exam
process since 2011. As a compensation, they were given an extra
attempt this year. But introducing changes just THREE MONTHS
before the exam marred their chances . So giving an extra attempt
was made null and void by brnging such changes. If this is not
INJUSTICE, then what else is?
WHAT DO WE WANT ?
In the wake of the GROSS INJUSTICE done to us ( UPSC CSE 2015
aspirants), we request/demand AN EXTRA ATTEMPT for all of us
who appeared in 2015. This is the least correction that can be
done to address the great harm done to us which have put in us
deep turmoil and despair.
Our demand would not lead to any law &order problem, nor would
lead to any burden of state exchequer, neither would it harm the
interests of anyone. It would only lead to betterment of all those
who want to serve the nation .It conforms to the core principles
of DEMOCRACY. Hope democracy wins again.

Battle_begins2015

@DUKHIYA isko bheji bhai change.org pe..n any oder place u feel lyk.

Failure'sGuide

@Failure'sGuide pls be in contact wid@ingamble2016

Please suggest how to make contact. And I am ready to do anything for our just cause.

Battle_begins2015

Inbox ur number to @Ingamble2016

Battle_begins2015

Inbox ur number to @Ingamble2016

@Failure'sGuide

hamarisansad

He he.....social network se bahar niklo bhai.....kranti balidan mangta h......convent wale babu log.....

Failure'sGuide

Sudden withdrawal of CSAT in 2015 proved to be the worst in the above scheme of examination and therefore merits special mention and immediate resolution. This sudden withdrawal of CSAT is also elitist, contrary to the popular perception. As completing the syllabus of GS paper I i.e. History, Polity, Economy etc requires more resources and time compared to the CSAT paper which checks the aptitude of candidates and therefore doesn’t require any specific preparation.