INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

Prelims 2017 Answer Key - All Sets + Share & Submit Scores to Estimmate Cut Off

1102103105107108352

Comments

  • abey shodganga ke pdf mein acha khasa horse ke terracota figure ka photo hai, uske baad bhi dimaag laga rhe ho, answer 1 only, aage badho
    answer 1 nahi hoga even though ncert clearly says horse available. i know upsc.
    they lifted from here, they will go with 1 and 3..
    isiliye tab se chilla raha hu sabko, ki make upsc aware of this issue of ambiguity.

    upsc pakka 1 and 3 karega if we dont take action


    Bhai where does ncert "clearly" says ki horses were there, no body can say this "clearly" bhai kyunki koi substantial proof nai hai iska har jagah koi na koi caveat zaroor likga hoga
    dekh lo ismei.
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8LSFxDTPZBiVXhCSzNldlBoaFk/view?usp=sharing
    Bhai no Offence but this does not seem ncert to me
    arey ncert ka bhi hai, ye other evidences ka hai.
    Makhhan lal or RS sharma mei clearly dia hai, aaj subah hi kisi ne post kia tha.
    Ismei bhi kaafi acche resources hi hai na yaar, upsc also took this question from a different book and not from ncert.
    Bhai makhan laal i agree ki dia hoga us poori ncert me yahi focus tha ki harappa me aryans hi rahte the, makhan laal ki ncert ki hisab se rig veda is more than 5000 years old

    Isilie i an giving 20 percnt to only 1 because of right wing govt at centre but i dint think upsc will be effected by any ideology

    Btw an excerpt from romila thapr's early india page no 85
    bhai i am not telling ki anyone is right or wrong, all i am telling is that people have different views regarding this and such things should not be asked in upsc.
    that i totally agree and I knew the moment i saw this question in exam ki question pe bahot bhasad machne vaali hai.

    any way attaching an excerpt from upinder singh jisse is question ki controversy aur badh jaaegi

    horse remains have been found but controversial and evidence of ppl being aware of horse cannot be deduced
    horse remains important nahi hai awarness hai remains to indus civilzation jane ke baad bhi asakta hai aur carbon dting se age pata ki hogi wo bhi fool proof nahi hai carbon dating kafi error rehta hai
  • abey shodganga ke pdf mein acha khasa horse ke terracota figure ka photo hai, uske baad bhi dimaag laga rhe ho, answer 1 only, aage badho
    answer 1 nahi hoga even though ncert clearly says horse available. i know upsc.
    they lifted from here, they will go with 1 and 3..
    isiliye tab se chilla raha hu sabko, ki make upsc aware of this issue of ambiguity.

    upsc pakka 1 and 3 karega if we dont take action


    Bhai where does ncert "clearly" says ki horses were there, no body can say this "clearly" bhai kyunki koi substantial proof nai hai iska har jagah koi na koi caveat zaroor likga hoga
    dekh lo ismei.
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8LSFxDTPZBiVXhCSzNldlBoaFk/view?usp=sharing
    Bhai no Offence but this does not seem ncert to me
    arey ncert ka bhi hai, ye other evidences ka hai.
    Makhhan lal or RS sharma mei clearly dia hai, aaj subah hi kisi ne post kia tha.
    Ismei bhi kaafi acche resources hi hai na yaar, upsc also took this question from a different book and not from ncert.
    Bhai makhan laal i agree ki dia hoga us poori ncert me yahi focus tha ki harappa me aryans hi rahte the, makhan laal ki ncert ki hisab se rig veda is more than 5000 years old

    Isilie i an giving 20 percnt to only 1 because of right wing govt at centre but i dint think upsc will be effected by any ideology

    Btw an excerpt from romila thapr's early india page no 85
    bhai i am not telling ki anyone is right or wrong, all i am telling is that people have different views regarding this and such things should not be asked in upsc.
    that i totally agree and I knew the moment i saw this question in exam ki question pe bahot bhasad machne vaali hai.

    any way attaching an excerpt from upinder singh jisse is question ki controversy aur badh jaaegi

    horse remains have been found but controversial and evidence of ppl being aware of horse cannot be deduced
    horse remains important nahi hai awarness hai remains to indus civilzation jane ke baad bhi asakta hai aur carbon dting se age pata ki hogi wo bhi fool proof nahi hai carbon dating kafi error rehta hai
    exactly
    the thing is whether there are evidence of ppl being aware of horses or not, on a lighter note mohan jo daro movie me hi dekho to hrithik was not aware of horse ab khaali usko baad me pata lag gaya to iska matlab ye thode hai ki poori civilization ko pata lag gaya :D

    baaki to bhai upsc ke upar hai, shiv hi jaane ki uske man me kya hai
  • abey shodganga ke pdf mein acha khasa horse ke terracota figure ka photo hai, uske baad bhi dimaag laga rhe ho, answer 1 only, aage badho
    answer 1 nahi hoga even though ncert clearly says horse available. i know upsc.
    they lifted from here, they will go with 1 and 3..
    isiliye tab se chilla raha hu sabko, ki make upsc aware of this issue of ambiguity.

    upsc pakka 1 and 3 karega if we dont take action


    Bhai where does ncert "clearly" says ki horses were there, no body can say this "clearly" bhai kyunki koi substantial proof nai hai iska har jagah koi na koi caveat zaroor likga hoga
    dekh lo ismei.
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8LSFxDTPZBiVXhCSzNldlBoaFk/view?usp=sharing
    Bhai no Offence but this does not seem ncert to me
    arey ncert ka bhi hai, ye other evidences ka hai.
    Makhhan lal or RS sharma mei clearly dia hai, aaj subah hi kisi ne post kia tha.
    Ismei bhi kaafi acche resources hi hai na yaar, upsc also took this question from a different book and not from ncert.
    Bhai makhan laal i agree ki dia hoga us poori ncert me yahi focus tha ki harappa me aryans hi rahte the, makhan laal ki ncert ki hisab se rig veda is more than 5000 years old

    Isilie i an giving 20 percnt to only 1 because of right wing govt at centre but i dint think upsc will be effected by any ideology

    Btw an excerpt from romila thapr's early india page no 85
    bhai i am not telling ki anyone is right or wrong, all i am telling is that people have different views regarding this and such things should not be asked in upsc.
    that i totally agree and I knew the moment i saw this question in exam ki question pe bahot bhasad machne vaali hai.

    any way attaching an excerpt from upinder singh jisse is question ki controversy aur badh jaaegi

    horse remains have been found but controversial and evidence of ppl being aware of horse cannot be deduced
    horse remains important nahi hai awarness hai remains to indus civilzation jane ke baad bhi asakta hai aur carbon dting se age pata ki hogi wo bhi fool proof nahi hai carbon dating kafi error rehta hai
    exactly
    the thing is whether there are evidence of ppl being aware of horses or not, on a lighter note mohan jo daro movie me hi dekho to hrithik was not aware of horse ab khaali usko baad me pata lag gaya to iska matlab ye thode hai ki poori civilization ko pata lag gaya :D

    baaki to bhai upsc ke upar hai, shiv hi jaane ki uske man me kya hai
    bina awareness ke yeh terracota bana dia? :lol:


  • edited June 2017
    abey shodganga ke pdf mein acha khasa horse ke terracota figure ka photo hai, uske baad bhi dimaag laga rhe ho, answer 1 only, aage badho
    answer 1 nahi hoga even though ncert clearly says horse available. i know upsc.
    they lifted from here, they will go with 1 and 3..
    isiliye tab se chilla raha hu sabko, ki make upsc aware of this issue of ambiguity.

    upsc pakka 1 and 3 karega if we dont take action


    Bhai where does ncert "clearly" says ki horses were there, no body can say this "clearly" bhai kyunki koi substantial proof nai hai iska har jagah koi na koi caveat zaroor likga hoga
    dekh lo ismei.
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8LSFxDTPZBiVXhCSzNldlBoaFk/view?usp=sharing
    Bhai no Offence but this does not seem ncert to me
    arey ncert ka bhi hai, ye other evidences ka hai.
    Makhhan lal or RS sharma mei clearly dia hai, aaj subah hi kisi ne post kia tha.
    Ismei bhi kaafi acche resources hi hai na yaar, upsc also took this question from a different book and not from ncert.
    Bhai makhan laal i agree ki dia hoga us poori ncert me yahi focus tha ki harappa me aryans hi rahte the, makhan laal ki ncert ki hisab se rig veda is more than 5000 years old

    Isilie i an giving 20 percnt to only 1 because of right wing govt at centre but i dint think upsc will be effected by any ideology

    Btw an excerpt from romila thapr's early india page no 85
    bhai i am not telling ki anyone is right or wrong, all i am telling is that people have different views regarding this and such things should not be asked in upsc.
    that i totally agree and I knew the moment i saw this question in exam ki question pe bahot bhasad machne vaali hai.

    any way attaching an excerpt from upinder singh jisse is question ki controversy aur badh jaaegi

    horse remains have been found but controversial and evidence of ppl being aware of horse cannot be deduced
    horse remains important nahi hai awarness hai remains to indus civilzation jane ke baad bhi asakta hai aur carbon dting se age pata ki hogi wo bhi fool proof nahi hai carbon dating kafi error rehta hai
    exactly
    the thing is whether there are evidence of ppl being aware of horses or not, on a lighter note mohan jo daro movie me hi dekho to hrithik was not aware of horse ab khaali usko baad me pata lag gaya to iska matlab ye thode hai ki poori civilization ko pata lag gaya :D

    baaki to bhai upsc ke upar hai, shiv hi jaane ki uske man me kya hai
    Exactly, aaj bhi to hamlog ..naye naye species dudn rhe hain ..even though they exists in our environemet, forests,landscape etc....jaise ki frog in western ghats, himayan thurst me northeast etc...pika in sikkim etc.. :D :p
    this logic may be little silly..
  • abey shodganga ke pdf mein acha khasa horse ke terracota figure ka photo hai, uske baad bhi dimaag laga rhe ho, answer 1 only, aage badho
    answer 1 nahi hoga even though ncert clearly says horse available. i know upsc.
    they lifted from here, they will go with 1 and 3..
    isiliye tab se chilla raha hu sabko, ki make upsc aware of this issue of ambiguity.

    upsc pakka 1 and 3 karega if we dont take action


    Bhai where does ncert "clearly" says ki horses were there, no body can say this "clearly" bhai kyunki koi substantial proof nai hai iska har jagah koi na koi caveat zaroor likga hoga
    dekh lo ismei.
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8LSFxDTPZBiVXhCSzNldlBoaFk/view?usp=sharing
    Bhai no Offence but this does not seem ncert to me
    arey ncert ka bhi hai, ye other evidences ka hai.
    Makhhan lal or RS sharma mei clearly dia hai, aaj subah hi kisi ne post kia tha.
    Ismei bhi kaafi acche resources hi hai na yaar, upsc also took this question from a different book and not from ncert.
    Bhai makhan laal i agree ki dia hoga us poori ncert me yahi focus tha ki harappa me aryans hi rahte the, makhan laal ki ncert ki hisab se rig veda is more than 5000 years old

    Isilie i an giving 20 percnt to only 1 because of right wing govt at centre but i dint think upsc will be effected by any ideology

    Btw an excerpt from romila thapr's early india page no 85
    bhai i am not telling ki anyone is right or wrong, all i am telling is that people have different views regarding this and such things should not be asked in upsc.
    that i totally agree and I knew the moment i saw this question in exam ki question pe bahot bhasad machne vaali hai.

    any way attaching an excerpt from upinder singh jisse is question ki controversy aur badh jaaegi

    horse remains have been found but controversial and evidence of ppl being aware of horse cannot be deduced
    horse remains important nahi hai awarness hai remains to indus civilzation jane ke baad bhi asakta hai aur carbon dting se age pata ki hogi wo bhi fool proof nahi hai carbon dating kafi error rehta hai
    exactly
    the thing is whether there are evidence of ppl being aware of horses or not, on a lighter note mohan jo daro movie me hi dekho to hrithik was not aware of horse ab khaali usko baad me pata lag gaya to iska matlab ye thode hai ki poori civilization ko pata lag gaya :D

    baaki to bhai upsc ke upar hai, shiv hi jaane ki uske man me kya hai
    bina awareness ke yeh terracota bana dia? :lol:


    ab pata chala ki unko pug breed dog bhi pata tha... :D
  • abey shodganga ke pdf mein acha khasa horse ke terracota figure ka photo hai, uske baad bhi dimaag laga rhe ho, answer 1 only, aage badho
    answer 1 nahi hoga even though ncert clearly says horse available. i know upsc.
    they lifted from here, they will go with 1 and 3..
    isiliye tab se chilla raha hu sabko, ki make upsc aware of this issue of ambiguity.

    upsc pakka 1 and 3 karega if we dont take action


    Bhai where does ncert "clearly" says ki horses were there, no body can say this "clearly" bhai kyunki koi substantial proof nai hai iska har jagah koi na koi caveat zaroor likga hoga
    dekh lo ismei.
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8LSFxDTPZBiVXhCSzNldlBoaFk/view?usp=sharing
    Bhai no Offence but this does not seem ncert to me
    arey ncert ka bhi hai, ye other evidences ka hai.
    Makhhan lal or RS sharma mei clearly dia hai, aaj subah hi kisi ne post kia tha.
    Ismei bhi kaafi acche resources hi hai na yaar, upsc also took this question from a different book and not from ncert.
    Bhai makhan laal i agree ki dia hoga us poori ncert me yahi focus tha ki harappa me aryans hi rahte the, makhan laal ki ncert ki hisab se rig veda is more than 5000 years old

    Isilie i an giving 20 percnt to only 1 because of right wing govt at centre but i dint think upsc will be effected by any ideology

    Btw an excerpt from romila thapr's early india page no 85
    bhai i am not telling ki anyone is right or wrong, all i am telling is that people have different views regarding this and such things should not be asked in upsc.
    that i totally agree and I knew the moment i saw this question in exam ki question pe bahot bhasad machne vaali hai.

    any way attaching an excerpt from upinder singh jisse is question ki controversy aur badh jaaegi

    horse remains have been found but controversial and evidence of ppl being aware of horse cannot be deduced
    horse remains important nahi hai awarness hai remains to indus civilzation jane ke baad bhi asakta hai aur carbon dting se age pata ki hogi wo bhi fool proof nahi hai carbon dating kafi error rehta hai
    exactly
    the thing is whether there are evidence of ppl being aware of horses or not, on a lighter note mohan jo daro movie me hi dekho to hrithik was not aware of horse ab khaali usko baad me pata lag gaya to iska matlab ye thode hai ki poori civilization ko pata lag gaya :D

    baaki to bhai upsc ke upar hai, shiv hi jaane ki uske man me kya hai
    bina awareness ke yeh terracota bana dia? :lol:


    ye wild ass ya phir gadhha bhi ho sakta hai. agar horse hota to ek haddi nahi..multiple haddi milta in that geography >:)
  • abey shodganga ke pdf mein acha khasa horse ke terracota figure ka photo hai, uske baad bhi dimaag laga rhe ho, answer 1 only, aage badho
    answer 1 nahi hoga even though ncert clearly says horse available. i know upsc.
    they lifted from here, they will go with 1 and 3..
    isiliye tab se chilla raha hu sabko, ki make upsc aware of this issue of ambiguity.

    upsc pakka 1 and 3 karega if we dont take action


    Bhai where does ncert "clearly" says ki horses were there, no body can say this "clearly" bhai kyunki koi substantial proof nai hai iska har jagah koi na koi caveat zaroor likga hoga
    dekh lo ismei.
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8LSFxDTPZBiVXhCSzNldlBoaFk/view?usp=sharing
    Bhai no Offence but this does not seem ncert to me
    arey ncert ka bhi hai, ye other evidences ka hai.
    Makhhan lal or RS sharma mei clearly dia hai, aaj subah hi kisi ne post kia tha.
    Ismei bhi kaafi acche resources hi hai na yaar, upsc also took this question from a different book and not from ncert.
    Bhai makhan laal i agree ki dia hoga us poori ncert me yahi focus tha ki harappa me aryans hi rahte the, makhan laal ki ncert ki hisab se rig veda is more than 5000 years old

    Isilie i an giving 20 percnt to only 1 because of right wing govt at centre but i dint think upsc will be effected by any ideology

    Btw an excerpt from romila thapr's early india page no 85
    bhai i am not telling ki anyone is right or wrong, all i am telling is that people have different views regarding this and such things should not be asked in upsc.
    that i totally agree and I knew the moment i saw this question in exam ki question pe bahot bhasad machne vaali hai.

    any way attaching an excerpt from upinder singh jisse is question ki controversy aur badh jaaegi

    horse remains have been found but controversial and evidence of ppl being aware of horse cannot be deduced
    horse remains important nahi hai awarness hai remains to indus civilzation jane ke baad bhi asakta hai aur carbon dting se age pata ki hogi wo bhi fool proof nahi hai carbon dating kafi error rehta hai
    exactly
    the thing is whether there are evidence of ppl being aware of horses or not, on a lighter note mohan jo daro movie me hi dekho to hrithik was not aware of horse ab khaali usko baad me pata lag gaya to iska matlab ye thode hai ki poori civilization ko pata lag gaya :D

    baaki to bhai upsc ke upar hai, shiv hi jaane ki uske man me kya hai
    bina awareness ke yeh terracota bana dia? :lol:


    ye wild ass ya phir gadhha bhi ho sakta hai. agar horse hota to ek haddi nahi..multiple haddi milta in that geography >:)
    Dil bahlane ko Galib, khyal acha hai :lol:
  • Ghoda India Ka Native Nahi Hai,Central Asia se aaya tha,Ye maana Jata hai largely.
    Surkotada ka Ghoda Harappa time ka ho sakta hai par Saare historian ise nahi maante mostly leftist view(pavid bhi isme ho sakta hai).
    Ho sakta hai vo Kitaab Pavid ne Hamari umr me padi ho,History tough thi,mujhe toh pavid ka haath lag raha hai isme.
  • abey shodganga ke pdf mein acha khasa horse ke terracota figure ka photo hai, uske baad bhi dimaag laga rhe ho, answer 1 only, aage badho
    answer 1 nahi hoga even though ncert clearly says horse available. i know upsc.
    they lifted from here, they will go with 1 and 3..
    isiliye tab se chilla raha hu sabko, ki make upsc aware of this issue of ambiguity.

    upsc pakka 1 and 3 karega if we dont take action


    Bhai where does ncert "clearly" says ki horses were there, no body can say this "clearly" bhai kyunki koi substantial proof nai hai iska har jagah koi na koi caveat zaroor likga hoga
    dekh lo ismei.
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8LSFxDTPZBiVXhCSzNldlBoaFk/view?usp=sharing
    Bhai no Offence but this does not seem ncert to me
    arey ncert ka bhi hai, ye other evidences ka hai.
    Makhhan lal or RS sharma mei clearly dia hai, aaj subah hi kisi ne post kia tha.
    Ismei bhi kaafi acche resources hi hai na yaar, upsc also took this question from a different book and not from ncert.
    Bhai makhan laal i agree ki dia hoga us poori ncert me yahi focus tha ki harappa me aryans hi rahte the, makhan laal ki ncert ki hisab se rig veda is more than 5000 years old

    Isilie i an giving 20 percnt to only 1 because of right wing govt at centre but i dint think upsc will be effected by any ideology

    Btw an excerpt from romila thapr's early india page no 85
    bhai i am not telling ki anyone is right or wrong, all i am telling is that people have different views regarding this and such things should not be asked in upsc.
    that i totally agree and I knew the moment i saw this question in exam ki question pe bahot bhasad machne vaali hai.

    any way attaching an excerpt from upinder singh jisse is question ki controversy aur badh jaaegi

    horse remains have been found but controversial and evidence of ppl being aware of horse cannot be deduced
    horse remains important nahi hai awarness hai remains to indus civilzation jane ke baad bhi asakta hai aur carbon dting se age pata ki hogi wo bhi fool proof nahi hai carbon dating kafi error rehta hai
    exactly
    the thing is whether there are evidence of ppl being aware of horses or not, on a lighter note mohan jo daro movie me hi dekho to hrithik was not aware of horse ab khaali usko baad me pata lag gaya to iska matlab ye thode hai ki poori civilization ko pata lag gaya :D

    baaki to bhai upsc ke upar hai, shiv hi jaane ki uske man me kya hai
    bina awareness ke yeh terracota bana dia? :lol:


    ye wild ass ya phir gadhha bhi ho sakta hai. agar horse hota to ek haddi nahi..multiple haddi milta in that geography >:)
    Dil bahlane ko Galib, khyal acha hai :lol:
    chodo yr main to kahta sab is sawal ko apna apna galat maan lo aur aage badho is sawal ka jawab sirf aur sirf upsc jaanta hai joki humko agle saal hi milega jab kisiko jawab se ghanta koi farak nai padega :P
  • abey shodganga ke pdf mein acha khasa horse ke terracota figure ka photo hai, uske baad bhi dimaag laga rhe ho, answer 1 only, aage badho
    answer 1 nahi hoga even though ncert clearly says horse available. i know upsc.
    they lifted from here, they will go with 1 and 3..
    isiliye tab se chilla raha hu sabko, ki make upsc aware of this issue of ambiguity.

    upsc pakka 1 and 3 karega if we dont take action


    Bhai where does ncert "clearly" says ki horses were there, no body can say this "clearly" bhai kyunki koi substantial proof nai hai iska har jagah koi na koi caveat zaroor likga hoga
    dekh lo ismei.
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8LSFxDTPZBiVXhCSzNldlBoaFk/view?usp=sharing
    Bhai no Offence but this does not seem ncert to me
    arey ncert ka bhi hai, ye other evidences ka hai.
    Makhhan lal or RS sharma mei clearly dia hai, aaj subah hi kisi ne post kia tha.
    Ismei bhi kaafi acche resources hi hai na yaar, upsc also took this question from a different book and not from ncert.
    Bhai makhan laal i agree ki dia hoga us poori ncert me yahi focus tha ki harappa me aryans hi rahte the, makhan laal ki ncert ki hisab se rig veda is more than 5000 years old

    Isilie i an giving 20 percnt to only 1 because of right wing govt at centre but i dint think upsc will be effected by any ideology

    Btw an excerpt from romila thapr's early india page no 85
    bhai i am not telling ki anyone is right or wrong, all i am telling is that people have different views regarding this and such things should not be asked in upsc.
    that i totally agree and I knew the moment i saw this question in exam ki question pe bahot bhasad machne vaali hai.

    any way attaching an excerpt from upinder singh jisse is question ki controversy aur badh jaaegi

    horse remains have been found but controversial and evidence of ppl being aware of horse cannot be deduced
    horse remains important nahi hai awarness hai remains to indus civilzation jane ke baad bhi asakta hai aur carbon dting se age pata ki hogi wo bhi fool proof nahi hai carbon dating kafi error rehta hai
    exactly
    the thing is whether there are evidence of ppl being aware of horses or not, on a lighter note mohan jo daro movie me hi dekho to hrithik was not aware of horse ab khaali usko baad me pata lag gaya to iska matlab ye thode hai ki poori civilization ko pata lag gaya :D

    baaki to bhai upsc ke upar hai, shiv hi jaane ki uske man me kya hai
    bina awareness ke yeh terracota bana dia? :lol:


    ye wild ass ya phir gadhha bhi ho sakta hai. agar horse hota to ek haddi nahi..multiple haddi milta in that geography >:)
    Dil bahlane ko Galib, khyal acha hai :lol:
    chodo yr main to kahta sab is sawal ko apna apna galat maan lo aur aage badho is sawal ka jawab sirf aur sirf upsc jaanta hai joki humko agle saal hi milega jab kisiko jawab se ghanta koi farak nai padega :P
    right to vote ko legal karwa do..to IVC ko galat man ke chalunaga :D
This discussion has been closed.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google