INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

'Rights' Movement : CSE-2015' [Final Draft] - Start Sending

1246761

Comments

  • @aqua_bleed you seem to be an unwanted byproduct of over-sexual play of your hopeless parents.
    aap to bura maan gaye.. :D kripya discussion mei sistachaar banaaye rakhe. :(
  • @aqua_bleed give ur suggestion.lets see wats in ur head?
    Why I felt the last minute changes were unreasonable:
    1.Aptitute is indeed a internationally accepted benchmark for testing talent, so removing(or making qualifying) is equivalent to negative evolution.
    2.With just 80 ques. and 33% qualification score, it was left toothless to really judge anything substantial, so its existence probably didn't serve any purpose.
    3.Just 100 GS questions to judge anyone for the country's most reputed exam is not fair(given the diversity of the subject and lowered standard(typical SSC style) of the paper this year)
    i agree with you gentleman! good line of thought.i agree with you and these arguments have been put forth and discussed.but govt organisations rely more on precedence and legal reasoning ,than rational arguments.

  • Only 100 ques argument is not used INTENTIONALLY, as we can't suggest upsc - which papers / questions to include / exclude in the exam,

    We were / are ready with no hesitation even if UPSC decides to make a question paper having only 10 questions or 1000 questions.

    We just NEED TO BE INFORMED ABOUT THE CHANGES 6-8 MONTHS IN ADVANCE. WE ARE NOT AGAINST "ANY" CHANGE.
  • For those who argue that if changes were made at last moment , they were same for everyone and hence fair , I have some counterarguments for them :

    1.Even CSAT was same for everyone , so people protested against it and y did govt first removed eng questions and then made csat qualifying ??

    2. What if 3 months before , it is informed that this time exam would be taken in Mandarin language only. Again it would be same for everyone .

    3. What if 3 months before , it is informed that this time selection would be based on rolling of dice ,and merit would be decided on the basis of score one gets .

    A number of such idiotic counter arguments can be given to an equally idiotic argument that it was same for everyone .

    The fact is that any examination scheme aims to select quality candidates best suited for the job and that's why a diverse syllabus is prepared which is notified much before the exam so that all candidates get enough time to prepare well before winner or loser is decided. Otherwise seats can be filled even by a lottery , which would be same for everyone , isn't it??



  • For those who argue that if changes were made at last moment , they were same for everyone and hence fair , I have some counterarguments for them :

    1.Even CSAT was same for everyone , so people protested against it and y did govt first removed eng questions and then made csat qualifying ??

    2. What if 3 months before , it is informed that this time exam would be taken in Mandarin language only. Again it would be same for everyone .

    3. What if 3 months before , it is informed that this time selection would be based on rolling of dice ,and merit would be decided on the basis of score one gets .

    A number of such idiotic counter arguments can be given to an equally idiotic argument that it was same for everyone .

    The fact is that any examination scheme aims to select quality candidates best suited for the job and that's why a diverse syllabus is prepared which is notified much before the exam so that all candidates get enough time to prepare well before winner or loser is decided. Otherwise seats can be filled even by a lottery , which would be same for everyone , isn't it??



    couldn't have been better put.
  • Start sending E-mails now...This is very important task friends.

    Link of Draft : https://goo.gl/HE1NEU
  • edited October 2015
    Final Draft (start sending in huge numbers) -> https://goo.gl/C4kKum

    We've to send it to the below mentioned email-ids.

    I)Hon'ble Minister Dr.Jitendra Singh : mos-pp@nic.in
    II)Secretary Shri Sanjay Kothari : secy_mop@nic.in
    III)Additional Secretary Shri Rajiv Kumar : eo@nic.in
    IV)Shri T. Jacob: assv@nic.in and tjacob@nic.in
    V)Joint Secretary ->
    1. Shri Pramod Kumar Das: jsv-dopt@nic.in
    2. Shri Jishnu Barua : jishnu.barua@ias.nic.in
    3. Shri Devesh Chaturvedi : d.chaturvedi@ias.nic.in
    4. Ms. Archana Varma : jsata@nic.in
    5. Ms. Mamta Kundra : jsest@nic.in

    # Baswan committee members E-mail Id's:
    1) bsbaswan@yahoo.com
    2) peter@csds.in

  • edited October 2015
    1.This is the body of the email that we will have to send. Please don't try to write the body on your own. Copy/Paste this as it is essential that all the mails should be same. Also omit either Sir or Madam as needed.

    2. Please don't send the mail to all the persons by including then in cc/bcc. send the mails individually. it will show that we respect their privacy and individuality.

    .........................................................................................................................................

    Email Subject: "Petition for extra attempts for CSE 2015 Candidates".

    Sir/Madam,

    I am a Civil Services aspirant whose chances for success in 2015 exam had been very adversely affected due to last minute changes introduced by the Government and the Authority in the exam pattern. I am therefore sending this representation like other fellow aspirants to request for a redressal of our grievances.

    Please find attached the document containing our Humble requests to the Government and Exam conducting Authority. This document also discusses the data and arguments behind our expectations from the Government and Authority for fair and just redressal of our grievances. Moreover, our cause won’t put any extra burden either on the state exchequer or in its
    implementation.

    Sir, I understand that you keep a very busy schedule. But i am confident enough that you would find a 20-minutes span of time to go through the attached document in full, which concerns the fate of a million youth of our country.


    Thank you very much for your kind consideration.

    Thanking You,
    Yours faithfully,
  • successfully sent to all ids.
  • gksgks
    edited October 2015
    For sending the draft, PLEASE TAKE CARE OF BELOW

    (1) Please don't send it 'ram madhav' FOR NOW as HE IS NOT A GOVT OFFICIAL - we'll send him SEPARATELY

    (2) Please download the draft with ONE MORE LINE ADDED TO IT from below location ->
    https://goo.gl/C4kKum

    (3) Please add the below line ALSO in BOLD, after second paragraph in the mail body ->

    Moreover, our cause won’t put any extra burden either on the state exchequer or in its implementation.

    (this is the line which is ADDED TO THE DRAFT IN THE BEGINNING)
This discussion has been closed.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google