INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

[Draft Uploaded] Collective Efforts to Demand Extra Age / Attempts for 2015 and 2011-2014 scenarios

1158159161163164207

Comments

  • Please don't click on the links posted in above post.
    BELOW ARE THE WORKING LINKS WHICH WOULD NOT ASK FOR PERMISSION ->

    Final Draft ->

    (1) Summary - Request for Relaxation - 2015 Prelims Abrupt Changes -> https://goo.gl/bHrnTT
    (2) Full Draft - Request for Relaxation - 2015 Prelims Abrupt Changes -> https://goo.gl/ODn5K6
    you people have done a wonderful job.
  • Please make an editable format so that we can submit our proposed corrections. @gks
  • Please don't click on the links posted in above post.
    BELOW ARE THE WORKING LINKS WHICH WOULD NOT ASK FOR PERMISSION ->

    Final Draft ->

    (1) Summary - Request for Relaxation - 2015 Prelims Abrupt Changes -> https://goo.gl/bHrnTT
    (2) Full Draft - Request for Relaxation - 2015 Prelims Abrupt Changes -> https://goo.gl/ODn5K6
    you people have done a wonderful job.
    @geeta pls do correct spell mistakes n corrections like insecure not unsecure..a few more r there..hope everyone stops cribbing n takes it in positive spirit..it gives bad impression if we have incorrect language.

  • if 5 persons are making 5 suggestions in the word document at 20 different and 5 same places - HOW WOULD I COMBINE THEM for Analysing their suitability ?

    It is a practical problem.

    The solution ->

    Refer to the Target paragraph by 'Point - sub-point' and propose the solution ->

    It would be the easiest way FOR ME to club the suggestions because we are not working in a shared environment.
  • Also please don't propose ANY MAJOR INCLUSION / exclusion as those HAD TO BE PROPOSED IN PAST 3-4 days since when the INITIAL DRAFT WAS IN PUBLIC DOMAIN, and NOT NOW at the LAST TIME.

    Any as can be seen in this draft - any MAJOR proposals proposed in last 3-4 days, have been incorporated in this draft.
  • Bhai meri eng thodi acchi nahi hi but app log batayie kuck karna hi to
  • proposals:
    in summary:
    1.after first para- a humanitarian perspective is requested" FROM THE GOVERNMENT"
    2. not unsecure but INSECURE YEAR
    3. after point number 4 in summary..it will be better if its written our other concerns and then mention the points..a,b,c etc.
    4. in point 4 only , i would suggest WE REQUEST ..its not our legal right( exact word told by dopt secy)
    REST EVERYTHING IS FINE.GOOD WORK @gks and team.
  • just read it brother, don't go for english - just look for 'idea flow'

    there would be someone else who would look for grammatical errors and appropriate words (which i don't think would be more than 3-4 in both the documents)
  • just read it brother, don't go for english - just look for 'idea flow'

    there would be someone else who would look for grammatical errors and appropriate words (which i don't think would be more than 3-4 in both the documents)
    <b>IDEA WISE EVERYTHING FINE.IF WE CAN MAKE IT BETTER,WE SHOULD NOT BE RELUCTANT.BELIEVE ME EVERYTHING COUNTS.</b>
  • @Battle_begins2015 @geeta

    if you are good in english grammar, please Proof-read the document for grammatical mistakes as it is NOT proofread yet by anyone OUTSIDE the drafting group.

    2 things to take care while proof-reading ->
    (1) There is NO spelling mistake (already checked by software)
    (2) There may be some QUITE DIFFERENT WORD suggested by software - for example - if i wanted to write 'hug' but i wrongly wrote 'hud' -> then while checking by the software it suggested 'hut' and i clicked 'yes' by mistake - so there would be 'hut' written in the document which is wrong, such 3-4 words may be there and have to be looked for mainly, because it would change the WHOLE meaning.
    (3) Some words are intentionally used 'currently-used' word in absence of better word - it does not mean that it is mistakenly written - it is used just in the basence of a better word - so please SUGGEST A BETTER WORD in those cases.

    and Thanks to 'battle_begins' he has pointed one thing that i forgot to request everyone who are going to proof-read the document ->

    Lets discuss the same example pointed by him - insecure and unsecure,
    Here 'unsecure' is being used in place of 'vulnerable' - ie, most vulnerable years of their youth (but then vulnerable might suggest - a specific area's youth are more vulnerable to become maoists), here it is not written BY MISTAKE in place of insecure because insecure is a noun and a state of mind and unsecure is 'unsecure from outside environment and effects' - like, unsecure computer network.

    So in such cases - please suggest a BETTER WORD in place of of 'unsecure' (instead of replacing it by insecure) because it is not mistakenly written - it is written because a BETTER word could be written but did not come to my mind

    I'm giving the same example as there would be around 10 places where a better word can be suggested.

This discussion has been closed.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google