INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

[CS Mains 2014] The Final Lap #BakarMarathon V7.0

1110711081110111211131143

Comments

  • i knew it was difficult..but never thought it would be so bad...NZ should have played better....
    dont worry my friend
    new zealand is going to win the WC
    mark my words..
    okay marked your words. Zero marks. :D
  • edited March 2015
    183 all out...hopefully a low scoring thriller now...which NZ wins.... :D
    remember india defended it once... :)>-
  • 183 all out...hopefully a low scoring thriller now...which NZ wins.... :D
    remember india defended it once... :)>-

    183

  • 183 all out...hopefully a low scoring thriller now...which NZ wins.... :D
    remember india defended it once... :)>-
    you do remember what happened when a team scored 183 the last time in a WC final but it was 32 long years back.
  • PS: This post is long and deals in gross generalizations. Please ignore if not interested. NOM

    I just finished reading 2 books about IAS
    In service of the state, IAS reconsidered : Bhaskar Ghose (AIR-5, 1960)
    Making a difference: KJ Alphons (AIR-8, 1979)

    If you read between the lines, Ghose appears as a man burdened with duty, really pained not just at the dismal state of affairs but also of his inability to do something meaningful about it.
    Though he does not make it explicit, tonally the book appears as an indictment of IAS - about how little an officer can do/change
    His career looks as if he is drifting through babudom with little control. He tries to find solace in theatre.

    Alphons is a different breed altogether. He absolutely revels in the job entrusted to him.
    He appears supremely confident and under control may be even cock-sure of his ability to drive the narrative the way he wants.
    His accomplishments and measurable outputs are truly monumental.
    But more importantly he has absolutely no regrets about his actions, even in cases where SC has ruled against them.
    You can look up his wikipedia page for a summary of his exploits: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphons_Kannanthanam

    Just one excerpt: While being probed in the interview about his name and Alphonso mangoes - he replies - It is the best of it's kind and so am I?
    How can some-one be so sure of his abilities?

    If you look at the moderators on the forum as well, this distinction becomes more apparent.
    Thor and Etat appear to be toiling under responsibility. On the other hand andy and particularly rookie revel in it.
    This is visible in their interaction and decision-making.

    The point:
    Does an intellectual really need to be an officer/administrator?
    I think some people, for any number of reasons, look for greater meaning in life, even though they intuitively know that none exists.
    This search manifests itself in their perusal of art and culture and becomes a downward/upward (depending upon the observer) spiral towards equanimity.
    However this equanimity/passivity is dangerous for any-one in a position of authority, because it occludes common-sense response.
    For them the spiritual/ideal takes precedence over the material.

    So while they are sound logicians their ability to 'do good' is severely curtailed.
    But the exam itself seeks such people because of it's pattern. Why??
  • Some comments r longer dan essays
  • 183 all out...hopefully a low scoring thriller now...which NZ wins.... :D
    remember india defended it once... :)>-
    you do remember what happened when a team scored 183 the last time in a WC final but it was 32 long years back.
    yes and english conditions too...it would be unbelievable if aussies lose this one..but NZ has good bowlers and one never knows...india wasnt expected to win against WI then either...Being a history student iam banking on the saying "history repeats itself" :D
  • Congrats @ramjet !! I am sure you will be able to respect the position you have earned. You will be janta ka face.... Janta ka mod!! >:D<
  • PS: This post is long and deals in gross generalizations. Please ignore if not interested. NOM

    I just finished reading 2 books about IAS
    In service of the state, IAS reconsidered : Bhaskar Ghose (AIR-5, 1960)
    Making a difference: KJ Alphons (AIR-8, 1979)

    If you read between the lines, Ghose appears as a man burdened with duty, really pained not just at the dismal state of affairs but also of his inability to do something meaningful about it.
    Though he does not make it explicit, tonally the book appears as an indictment of IAS - about how little an officer can do/change
    His career looks as if he is drifting through babudom with little control. He tries to find solace in theatre.

    Alphons is a different breed altogether. He absolutely revels in the job entrusted to him.
    He appears supremely confident and under control may be even cock-sure of his ability to drive the narrative the way he wants.
    His accomplishments and measurable outputs are truly monumental.
    But more importantly he has absolutely no regrets about his actions, even in cases where SC has ruled against them.
    You can look up his wikipedia page for a summary of his exploits: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphons_Kannanthanam

    Just one excerpt: While being probed in the interview about his name and Alphonso mangoes - he replies - It is the best of it's kind and so am I?
    How can some-one be so sure of his abilities?

    If you look at the moderators on the forum as well, this distinction becomes more apparent.
    Thor and Etat appear to be toiling under responsibility. On the other hand andy and particularly rookie revel in it.
    This is visible in their interaction and decision-making.

    The point:
    Does an intellectual really need to be an officer/administrator?
    I think some people, for any number of reasons, look for greater meaning in life, even though they intuitively know that none exists.
    This search manifests itself in their perusal of art and culture and becomes a downward/upward (depending upon the observer) spiral towards equanimity.
    However this equanimity/passivity is dangerous for any-one in a position of authority, because it occludes common-sense response.
    For them the spiritual/ideal takes precedence over the material.

    So while they are sound logicians their ability to 'do good' is severely curtailed.
    But the exam itself seeks such people because of it's pattern. Why??
    Nice
This discussion has been closed.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google