INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

IFoS Expected Cutoff Poll

15791011

Comments

  • @Fuhrer bhai mujhe lagta hai 121,122,123 me se koi ek number hoga cutoff... after analyzing the poll result and my experience.
  • edited June 2017
    Find attached the latest results for IFoS
    very confusing..... etne kam sample se to cant conclude anything
    Sample sahi ho to small sample se bhi idea lag jata hai,but the sample of aspirants voting yahan bahut distorted hai(as evident from marks distribution),wo sahi sample tab hi banega ab jab kaafi log vote karein.more no of responses needed to reduce the distortion.
    thats what i wanted to say... i mean how can it be tilted towards either <115 or >127
    because less than 115 and more than 127 are larger intervals where as other are just 2 mark intervals, kamal karte ho yaar, obviously there will be more people <115 and >127
    larger intervals ki baat yahan nahi hai be, jis proportion me 127+ votes hain,us hisab se niche 115-127 ka distribution sahi nahi hai,as the marks decreases concentration of studentsshould increase\ in that "proportion",ye absolute no se comparison wala logic UPTU ke colleges me padha hoga tumne :mrgreen: simple me samjhata hu,127 plus agar 30 hai to 115 ke niche 300 hone chahye,aur agar bas 127+ wale 3 hai to 115 ke niche 30 hone chahye,aisa correlation dikhna chahye tha graph se.isliye kah raha sample is distorted.
  • Find attached the latest results for IFoS
    very confusing..... etne kam sample se to cant conclude anything
    Sample sahi ho to small sample se bhi idea lag jata hai,but the sample of aspirants voting yahan bahut distorted hai(as evident from marks distribution),wo sahi sample tab hi banega ab jab kaafi log vote karein.more no of responses needed to reduce the distortion.
    thats what i wanted to say... i mean how can it be tilted towards either <115 or >127
    because less than 115 and more than 127 are larger intervals where as other are just 2 mark intervals, kamal karte ho yaar, obviously there will be more people <115 and >127
    baat ko samjho dost... refer aristodemus's comment
  • Find attached the latest results for IFoS
    very confusing..... etne kam sample se to cant conclude anything
    Sample sahi ho to small sample se bhi idea lag jata hai,but the sample of aspirants voting yahan bahut distorted hai(as evident from marks distribution),wo sahi sample tab hi banega ab jab kaafi log vote karein.more no of responses needed to reduce the distortion.
    thats what i wanted to say... i mean how can it be tilted towards either <115 or >127
    because less than 115 and more than 127 are larger intervals where as other are just 2 mark intervals, kamal karte ho yaar, obviously there will be more people <115 and >127
    larger intervals ki baat yahan nahi hai be, jis proportion me 127+ votes hain,us hisab se niche 115-127 ka distribution sahi nahi hai,as the marks decreases concentration of studentsshould increase\ in that "proportion",ye absolute no se comparison wala logic UPTU ke colleges me padha hoga tumne :mrgreen: simple me samjhata hu,127 plus agar 30 hai to 115 ke niche 300 hone chahye,aur agar bas 127+ wale 3 hai to 115 ke niche 30 hone chahye,aisa correlation dikhna chahye tha graph se.isliye kah raha sample is distorted.
    Hue nhi h 127+ votes.. karnama h ye ek do laundo Ka.. I don't deny kuch genuinely honge
  • it will finally come - the range i have given on monday-121-123 :mrgreen:
    B)
  • Find attached the latest results for IFoS
    very confusing..... etne kam sample se to cant conclude anything
    Sample sahi ho to small sample se bhi idea lag jata hai,but the sample of aspirants voting yahan bahut distorted hai(as evident from marks distribution),wo sahi sample tab hi banega ab jab kaafi log vote karein.more no of responses needed to reduce the distortion.
    thats what i wanted to say... i mean how can it be tilted towards either <115 or >127
    because less than 115 and more than 127 are larger intervals where as other are just 2 mark intervals, kamal karte ho yaar, obviously there will be more people <115 and >127
    larger intervals ki baat yahan nahi hai be, jis proportion me 127+ votes hain,us hisab se niche 115-127 ka distribution sahi nahi hai,as the marks decreases concentration of studentsshould increase\ in that "proportion",ye absolute no se comparison wala logic UPTU ke colleges me padha hoga tumne :mrgreen: simple me samjhata hu,127 plus agar 30 hai to 115 ke niche 300 hone chahye,aur agar bas 127+ wale 3 hai to 115 ke niche 30 hone chahye,aisa correlation dikhna chahye tha graph se.isliye kah raha sample is distorted.
    Main jis college se pda hu uska naam likh diya to hawa nikal jayegi teri, sala paper 2 fail :mrgreen:
  • Find attached the latest results for IFoS
    very confusing..... etne kam sample se to cant conclude anything
    Sample sahi ho to small sample se bhi idea lag jata hai,but the sample of aspirants voting yahan bahut distorted hai(as evident from marks distribution),wo sahi sample tab hi banega ab jab kaafi log vote karein.more no of responses needed to reduce the distortion.
    thats what i wanted to say... i mean how can it be tilted towards either <115 or >127
    because less than 115 and more than 127 are larger intervals where as other are just 2 mark intervals, kamal karte ho yaar, obviously there will be more people <115 and >127
    larger intervals ki baat yahan nahi hai be, jis proportion me 127+ votes hain,us hisab se niche 115-127 ka distribution sahi nahi hai,as the marks decreases concentration of studentsshould increase\ in that "proportion",ye absolute no se comparison wala logic UPTU ke colleges me padha hoga tumne :mrgreen: simple me samjhata hu,127 plus agar 30 hai to 115 ke niche 300 hone chahye,aur agar bas 127+ wale 3 hai to 115 ke niche 30 hone chahye,aisa correlation dikhna chahye tha graph se.isliye kah raha sample is distorted.

    farzi hai ye admi.... 10th boards me iski mathematics me compartment lagi thi... mera padosi hai ye.... isko ghanta pata hai statistics ke bare me .... side me khada karo isko :mrgreen:
  • Find attached the latest results for IFoS
    very confusing..... etne kam sample se to cant conclude anything
    Sample sahi ho to small sample se bhi idea lag jata hai,but the sample of aspirants voting yahan bahut distorted hai(as evident from marks distribution),wo sahi sample tab hi banega ab jab kaafi log vote karein.more no of responses needed to reduce the distortion.
    thats what i wanted to say... i mean how can it be tilted towards either <115 or >127
    because less than 115 and more than 127 are larger intervals where as other are just 2 mark intervals, kamal karte ho yaar, obviously there will be more people <115 and >127
    larger intervals ki baat yahan nahi hai be, jis proportion me 127+ votes hain,us hisab se niche 115-127 ka distribution sahi nahi hai,as the marks decreases concentration of studentsshould increase\ in that "proportion",ye absolute no se comparison wala logic UPTU ke colleges me padha hoga tumne :mrgreen: simple me samjhata hu,127 plus agar 30 hai to 115 ke niche 300 hone chahye,aur agar bas 127+ wale 3 hai to 115 ke niche 30 hone chahye,aisa correlation dikhna chahye tha graph se.isliye kah raha sample is distorted.

    farzi hai ye admi.... 10th boards me iski mathematics me compartment lagi thi... mera padosi hai ye.... isko ghanta pata hai statistics ke bare me .... side me khada karo isko :mrgreen:
    hahah lagta hai 109 se kam number hai tere :lol:
  • Find attached the latest results for IFoS
    very confusing..... etne kam sample se to cant conclude anything
    Sample sahi ho to small sample se bhi idea lag jata hai,but the sample of aspirants voting yahan bahut distorted hai(as evident from marks distribution),wo sahi sample tab hi banega ab jab kaafi log vote karein.more no of responses needed to reduce the distortion.
    thats what i wanted to say... i mean how can it be tilted towards either <115 or >127
    because less than 115 and more than 127 are larger intervals where as other are just 2 mark intervals, kamal karte ho yaar, obviously there will be more people <115 and >127
    larger intervals ki baat yahan nahi hai be, jis proportion me 127+ votes hain,us hisab se niche 115-127 ka distribution sahi nahi hai,as the marks decreases concentration of studentsshould increase\ in that "proportion",ye absolute no se comparison wala logic UPTU ke colleges me padha hoga tumne :mrgreen: simple me samjhata hu,127 plus agar 30 hai to 115 ke niche 300 hone chahye,aur agar bas 127+ wale 3 hai to 115 ke niche 30 hone chahye,aisa correlation dikhna chahye tha graph se.isliye kah raha sample is distorted.
    Main jis college se pda hu uska naam likh diya to hawa nikal jayegi teri, sala paper 2 fail :mrgreen:
    badhiya,chal ab apne college ki bus pakad ke nikal le idhar se-


  • Find attached the latest results for IFoS
    very confusing..... etne kam sample se to cant conclude anything
    Sample sahi ho to small sample se bhi idea lag jata hai,but the sample of aspirants voting yahan bahut distorted hai(as evident from marks distribution),wo sahi sample tab hi banega ab jab kaafi log vote karein.more no of responses needed to reduce the distortion.
    thats what i wanted to say... i mean how can it be tilted towards either <115 or >127
    because less than 115 and more than 127 are larger intervals where as other are just 2 mark intervals, kamal karte ho yaar, obviously there will be more people <115 and >127
    larger intervals ki baat yahan nahi hai be, jis proportion me 127+ votes hain,us hisab se niche 115-127 ka distribution sahi nahi hai,as the marks decreases concentration of studentsshould increase\ in that "proportion",ye absolute no se comparison wala logic UPTU ke colleges me padha hoga tumne :mrgreen: simple me samjhata hu,127 plus agar 30 hai to 115 ke niche 300 hone chahye,aur agar bas 127+ wale 3 hai to 115 ke niche 30 hone chahye,aisa correlation dikhna chahye tha graph se.isliye kah raha sample is distorted.
    Main jis college se pda hu uska naam likh diya to hawa nikal jayegi teri, sala paper 2 fail :mrgreen:
    badhiya,chal ab apne college ki bus pakad ke nikal le idhar se-


    bahot hi tuccha college hai tera, kisi ache college se pda hota tu to paper 2 mein fail nahi hota :mrgreen:
Sign In or Join to comment.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google