INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

Interview 2014 Transcripts and Experiences

18283858788130

Comments

  • interview board has no idea about mains marks, hell they dont even know who is going to come next until they get his data 5 minutes before the candidate enters the room.
    many seniors in the past have confirmed this. Also, getting the data 5 mins earlier doesnt refute my statement. The chairman may not know who is coming next but he may surely know that whoever the first person is has scored more or less. Several examples of ppl getting 60,63 etc when they required 80 to qualify sent this feeling to me. I am not very sure abt whther the order of calling is the mechanism. But they know abt marks, I m pretty confident abt this.
  • interview board has no idea about mains marks, hell they dont even know who is going to come next until they get his data 5 minutes before the candidate enters the room.
    many seniors in the past have confirmed this. Also, getting the data 5 mins earlier doesnt refute my statement. The chairman may not know who is coming next but he may surely know that whoever the first person is has scored more or less. Several examples of ppl getting 60,63 etc when they required 80 to qualify sent this feeling to me. I am not very sure abt whther the order of calling is the mechanism. But they know abt marks, I m pretty confident abt this.
    Even I feel they have some idea about the marks.
    This is what I've heard from a teacher -
    That UPSC panelists have in their sheets these boxes to tick, which are -
    Suitable for AIS,
    Suitable for Group A Central Services,
    Suitable for Group B Central Services,
    Not recommended.

    And how in the world they can refuse or accept somebody's candidature without knowing the mains' marks.
  • interview board has no idea about mains marks, hell they dont even know who is going to come next until they get his data 5 minutes before the candidate enters the room.
    many seniors in the past have confirmed this. Also, getting the data 5 mins earlier doesnt refute my statement. The chairman may not know who is coming next but he may surely know that whoever the first person is has scored more or less. Several examples of ppl getting 60,63 etc when they required 80 to qualify sent this feeling to me. I am not very sure abt whther the order of calling is the mechanism. But they know abt marks, I m pretty confident abt this.
    Bhai anyone not qualifying would get some marks lesser than the qualifying marks......so each one wud feel k i needed 10 or 20 or 30 more marks .....so u cannot say that by looking at d marks of candidates

  • Dear see the interview transcript of tanu priya 18th rank CSE 12 she was last to go for interview. now its impossible to believe that she has scored least among them. So plz don't speculate.
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AE_Z5-PQFXBv3aSu8NbOlMXLOkxzZ2Bd0RC6scB3elo/edit?usp=sharing
  • interview board has no idea about mains marks, hell they dont even know who is going to come next until they get his data 5 minutes before the candidate enters the room.
    many seniors in the past have confirmed this. Also, getting the data 5 mins earlier doesnt refute my statement. The chairman may not know who is coming next but he may surely know that whoever the first person is has scored more or less. Several examples of ppl getting 60,63 etc when they required 80 to qualify sent this feeling to me. I am not very sure abt whther the order of calling is the mechanism. But they know abt marks, I m pretty confident abt this.
    Bhai anyone not qualifying would get some marks lesser than the qualifying marks......so each one wud feel k i needed 10 or 20 or 30 more marks .....so u cannot say that by looking at d marks of candidates

    I agree on that bhai....but 80 needed and u get 60....a couple of eg like that I could not ignore this.....esp from boards who are considered liberal..
  • If candidates were to be called according to marks, why was random allocation of PT dates done this time? I believe mains marks at this stage is confidential and stays with the confidential dept. of U.P.S.C. Candidates are allotted to different teams within U.P.S.C which then verifies candidates certificates and arrange them for P.T based on some criteria viz; roll no., name etc. I am allotted to Exam-9 team, which I came to know from the call letter. So there must be Exam-1, 2 etc. Its written for all candidates on their call letter hard copy. It is this team who then decides in which sequence candidates will go for their P.T

    So, mains marks play NO ROLE in P.T sequencing !
  • @ kumar deepak..
    it wud be naive to assume upsc follows the same mechanism every year. Anyways my point is not how it does it. It was whether it does it or not.
  • If candidates were to be called according to marks, why was random allocation of PT dates done this time? I believe mains marks at this stage is confidential and stays with the confidential dept. of U.P.S.C. Candidates are allotted to different teams within U.P.S.C which then verifies candidates certificates and arrange them for P.T based on some criteria viz; roll no., name etc. I am allotted to Exam-9 team, which I came to know from the call letter. So there must be Exam-1, 2 etc. Its written for all candidates on their call letter hard copy. It is this team who then decides in which sequence candidates will go for their P.T

    So, mains marks play NO ROLE in P.T sequencing !
    exactly, and these teams may well be from the confidential deptts. Cant they be ?. I am just speculating on the basis of a pattern I saw, I agree the sample space was very small so as to confirm anything. I am not claiming it to be true. Just a doubt I wanted to share. Pt ke baad waise bhi dimaag jyada tez chal rha hai in cheezon me....:(
  • If candidates were to be called according to marks, why was random allocation of PT dates done this time? I believe mains marks at this stage is confidential and stays with the confidential dept. of U.P.S.C. Candidates are allotted to different teams within U.P.S.C which then verifies candidates certificates and arrange them for P.T based on some criteria viz; roll no., name etc. I am allotted to Exam-9 team, which I came to know from the call letter. So there must be Exam-1, 2 etc. Its written for all candidates on their call letter hard copy. It is this team who then decides in which sequence candidates will go for their P.T

    So, mains marks play NO ROLE in P.T sequencing !
    exactly, and these teams may well be from the confidential deptts. Cant they be ?. I am just speculating on the basis of a pattern I saw, I agree the sample space was very small so as to confirm anything. I am not claiming it to be true. Just a doubt I wanted to share. Pt ke baad waise bhi dimaag jyada tez chal rha hai in cheezon me....:(
    if you have to pick people from confidential dept. to form other teams, why call them confidential in the first place?

    Its like during budget prep. "select" MoFin people go underground. I am assuming something similar must be true for UPSC, else there is no purpose of having a confidential dept.
  • Having spoken to a few ex-board members of UPSC, I am entirely confident that neither the members nor the Chairman have any idea about your written marks. And as others have stated, there are certain Confidential cell(s) in UPSC who alone are aware of the written marks.
This discussion has been closed.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google