INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

Is the Modi governement taking arbitrary & tyrannical decisions in everything?

1192022242545

Comments

  • Religious demography change does create troubles like east timor seceeded from indonesia,south sudan from sudan (both were christian majority)..nigeria has 50% christians n 48% muslims..boko haram (ie western education is forbidden) is quite active there. I n india due to mass conversions 2011 christian percentage is- meghalaya 70%,nagaland 90%, mizoram 86% , manipur 34%,arunachal pradesh 21%. Mizoram congress manifesto of 1988 promised roman catholic theocracy. AZ phizo ,leader of naga insurgents( a naga christian) wanted to secede from india n remain a vassal of vatican city n was fighting for it.

    Undivided india had 25% muslims. Inhone iss desh ko baata aur 10 lakh hinduon ko kaata. Hamare bacche anaath hue (like milkha singh)..aurton ke balaatkar hue. At time of independence there were 20% hindu in pakistan n 32% in east pakistan (now bangladesh)..now there r only 1% hindu in pakistan n 7% in bangladesh. On other hand,muslims increased from 9% in 1947 to 14.2 in 2011(in absolute numbers it is a stupendous figure)..Now they r asking for quota.People who ruled for 800 years, broke n looted 2000 temples, kept lakhs of hindu women in their harem, forcefully converted crores,abetted in partition want quota.Child marriage , purdah ,sati , manual scavenging started due to islamic tyranny. Muslims would kidnap hindu girls so they were kept in veil , wedded early or else did sati. Dry toilets came into being for girls as it was not safe for them to go in fields so manual scavenging started.

    Kerala has highest literacy rate (>90%) still fertility rate of muslims is highest. In 1947 hindus were 66%. In 2011 ,they are 53% only.

    Himanshu roy ( senior IPS 1988 batch) told that madarsas are teaching muslim children about vision of ghazwa-i-hind (islamic india with sharia law) ..they say that india is unfinished project of islamic conquest. The idea is to break india from within n subjugate kafirs.

    Kashmiri pandits in jan 1990 were given 3 options- males should leave kashmir or convert to islam or perish(they would take care of our women ).People living there for 5000 years were rendered homeless. They issue fatwas for amarnath yatras.

    India is only secular country in the world without uniform civil code. anyways we are secular =)) .

    Acc to pew research institute of Usa , muslims were 12.8% in 1911 ( hindus 13.1% n christians 32%). In 2050 with current trends, muslims will be 30%(hindus 14% n christians 32%). It is one civilisation that considers itself superior to others ( Quran Verse 9:33 ).They r fighting with hindus,jews,christians,buddhists,atheists n even shia,ismailis,ahmediyyas (apparently they are kafirs too).

    In medieval times , we fought amongst ourselves. Kuch ne toh apni behan-beti tak ke saude kar daale. Sirf ek sher tha maharana pratap jo kabhi jhuka nahi. Main apni antim saans tak hindu asmita ( honour) ki raksha karunga. Main aise apni bharat maa ka cheer haran, balaatkar nahi hone dunga. Itna sab hone ke baad bhi jo khoon na khaule woh paani hai.

    Mere sabhi pseudo-secular friends- Is ladai me agar main haar jau toh meri maut ka tamasha dekhna aur chakkon ki tarah taali bajana. =D>
  • @Etat kindly take note of the comment posted by @addy_adi above, it's nothing short of inflammatory.
  • Its easy to bashing from fences .
    This thread sould bring to the notice of papu family, they would be really happy to see that they got so many papuites :)
  • Unfortunately, this is what happens every time someone starts a debate /discussion on Modi a fanatic sycophant makes a comment such as above and pulls down the discussion to his level. Always, invariably.
  • Its easy to bashing from fences .
    This thread sould bring to the notice of papu family, they would be really happy to see that they got so many papuites :)
    Is it too difficult to comprehend that criticizing Modi or the BJP is not equivalent to supporting the Congress?

  • Lets restart it , we're singulars cum sexulars :) , not expected to get swayed by such up and downs .chill bro !!!
    Btw, I read Pappu is soon going to block the GST and aiming to enlighten the nation over GST by his Yatra's . Cheats and notes are already to show excellence over the topic. I would not be surprised if this time he get slapped by jately !! Kidding ! :)
  • Unfortunately, this is what happens every time someone starts a debate /discussion on Modi a fanatic sycophant makes a comment such as above and pulls down the discussion to his level. Always, invariably.
    This was your so called debate YOU "A FANATIC SYCOPHANT"..
    'How to run a country using only smoke-screens and eyewash'
    By N. Modi.
    Step 1: Make a big deal about your swearing in ceremony. Give them something to talk about, even if you have to fake warmth with your sparring neighbor.
    Step 2: Take a foreign trip, start with the small countries, let them see how benevolent you are.
    This should set the tone right. And yes, take a LOT of selfies. Remember, selfies are the most visible aspect of foreign diplomacy.
    Step 3: Come back home (i know it sucks but come on, you have to spend SOME time in your country) Announce a block bluster scheme, the more sanskrit sounding the name is- the better
    Step 4: Coin a catchy phrase to go along with and deliver it with great showmanship.
    Step 5: Ban stuff that is frowned upon by the Hindutva Elders.
    Step 6: Apply xenophobic ultra- nationalism rhetoric for the 'Fan Bhakts'- but don't go overboard, leave them zombified, awestruck and drooling for more.
    Step 7: Take another foreign trip and repeat steps 3-6.
  • @Etat kindly take note of the comment posted by @addy_adi above, it's nothing short of inflammatory.
    Well. I used to flag inflammatory comments, but I won't be doing it neither will I be supporting it. I'll tell you my reasons :

    1. It gives us an opportunity to get these "drawing room " conversations out in the public.

    2. Before the 2014 General elections, most of these "educated" lot gave an argument about how Modi would be a boon to economics, that he has reformed post 2002. Well, there are people who were tired of the Congress and moribund state of the economy. But. But, they are not the ones who would try to shout you down or come up with vocabularies of their own - sickulars, presstitutes, etc.
    These arguments were conspicuous by their absence pre election ( at least among the "educated" ).
    Now, more than a year has passed. The honeymoon is over. The swing voters are disenchanted. The desperation among the bhakts is visible. Here is their modus operandi :

    1. First, they claim that their beloved leader has done so much. If you try to talk in terms of economics, forget it.

    2. Their only resort is shouting down opponents, ganging up , sloganeering , rhetoric and of course abuses.

    Letting them speak at least exposes the hollowness that the bhakts stand up for.
  • Its easy to bashing from fences .
    This thread sould bring to the notice of papu family, they would be really happy to see that they got so many papuites :)
    Is it too difficult to comprehend that criticizing Modi or the BJP is not equivalent to supporting the Congress?

    Bro, if he had the power to comprehend anything, he wound be spewing his stupidity on the internet in the first place.
  • @Etat kindly take note of the comment posted by @addy_adi above, it's nothing short of inflammatory.
    Well. I used to flag inflammatory comments, but I won't be doing it neither will I be supporting it. I'll tell you my reasons :

    1. It gives us an opportunity to get these "drawing room " conversations out in the public.

    2. Before the 2014 General elections, most of these "educated" lot gave an argument about how Modi would be a boon to economics, that he has reformed post 2002. Well, there are people who were tired of the Congress and moribund state of the economy. But. But, they are not the ones who would try to shout you down or come up with vocabularies of their own - sickulars, presstitutes, etc.
    These arguments were conspicuous by their absence pre election ( at least among the "educated" ).
    Now, more than a year has passed. The honeymoon is over. The swing voters are disenchanted. The desperation among the bhakts is visible. Here is their modus operandi :

    1. First, they claim that their beloved leader has done so much. If you try to talk in terms of economics, forget it.

    2. Their only resort is shouting down opponents, ganging up , sloganeering , rhetoric and of course abuses.

    Letting them speak at least exposes the hollowness that the bhakts stand up for.
    IF YOU TRY TO TALK IN TERMS OF ECONOMICS......hehehehe abe kitna hasayega....economics ki ba karta hai....sala aaj tak bade bade economist khud economics nahi samajh paye aur tu ghana vidwan ban raha hai economics ka...bhai ek bar fir se talk in terms of economics...hume bhi to pata chale ki aisa kya gajab ho gaya indian economy main pichle 1-2 saal main....

    waise burnol ka stock delhi main nsui aur cyss walo ke pas bahut hai kal se...thoda wahan se le lena jis jis khangressi ke aag lag gayi ho
This discussion has been closed.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google