INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

LGBT Rights & IPC Section 377

12346»

Comments

  • Yup saw it .. Oh Boy .. !! He had that guts , indeed . =D>
  • .
    dude do u really have to paint a dot after every comment of yours ?? =:)
  • @rookie , it was good one :D
  • @rookie । technical problem.
  • @rookie
    I came to the legal question because of this statement -
    "Just some human rights activists or LGBT community think in that way, the SC will change its decision in favour of them? Does anybody thinks what the whole country thinks.."

    I just wanted to highlight that it's about right and wrong and not about minority and majority. Otherwise why should anybody think of what the whole country thinks. If a statement doesn't convey what one intends, then someone with a different PoV will, in all probability, counter that :)
  • @igirit
    Yes. In fact, the judgment, as you highlighted, that classifies them into separate category shows why the art 15 failed to convince SC as they didn't regard them as equals. As I said earlier, people are not being devoid of "right to equality" for no visible reason. Now, you and me, may consider that reason to be unfair and against natural laws but it does provides legality to the judgment.
Sign In or Join to comment.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google