What is the Expected Cut off for UPSC Prelims 2017?

chills 1

Dhinchak pooja is confident of clearing prelim

tyrion_the_imp

right to vote is a constiutional right.. shankar is wrong in this as well. lot of mistakes..

1) which article states the right ?
2) if u change rpa act, can u add/reduce the number of voter ?
3) if it is constitutional right to vote, then y the detained cant vote ? but they can file nominations..

Anticipated Success

right to vote is a constiutional right.. shankar is wrong in this as well. lot of mistakes..

1) which article states the right ?
2) if u change rpa act, can u add/reduce the number of voter ?
3) if it is constitutional right to vote, then y the detained cant vote ? but they can file nominations..

It is a constitutional right regulated by appropriate act of parliament. Clearly mentioned in ncert. Its roots are in constitution.
If age of the voter is to be increased or decreased then why it requires a constitutional amendment???

Reddy_2ruly

right to vote is a constiutional right.. shankar is wrong in this as well. lot of mistakes..

1) which article states the right ?
2) if u change rpa act, can u add/reduce the number of voter ?
3) if it is constitutional right to vote, then y the detained cant vote ? but they can file nominations..

It is a constitutional right regulated by appropriate act of parliament. Clearly mentioned in ncert. Its roots are in constitution.
If age of the voter is to be increased or decreased then why it requires a constitutional amendment???

Regulation is the key here. A person might lose his voting right subject to the provisions of rpa. The said person cannot challenge on the grounds of article 326 which gives a general guide line for all persons of an appropriate age to have a voting right.
Ps. I have marked constitutional right in the heat of the moment without deliberating much. But I guess it will be wrong.

sriV2

I think we can expect result anytime now. Its already 32 days and last time it came in 31 days.

sriV2

I think we can expect result anytime now. Its already 32 days and last time it came in 31 days.

Sorry last time it came in 38 days

abc_upsc

Last time result Came in 40 days

Sahil Sonkar

right to vote is a constiutional right.. shankar is wrong in this as well. lot of mistakes..

1) which article states the right ?
2) if u change rpa act, can u add/reduce the number of voter ?
3) if it is constitutional right to vote, then y the detained cant vote ? but they can file nominations..

It is a constitutional right regulated by appropriate act of parliament. Clearly mentioned in ncert. Its roots are in constitution.
If age of the voter is to be increased or decreased then why it requires a constitutional amendment???

Regulation is the key here. A person might lose his voting right subject to the provisions of rpa. The said person cannot challenge on the grounds of article 326 which gives a general guide line for all persons of an appropriate age to have a voting right.
Ps. I have marked constitutional right in the heat of the moment without deliberating much. But I guess it will be wrong.

Bro a person would also loose its right to freedom (6 rights ) subject to the provision of reasonable restriction. which is time to time decided by court and some are given in constitution it self.

On the same logic RPA provides only ground/situation/condition of reasonable restriction. according to which A person might lose his voting right.

Reddy_2ruly

right to vote is a constiutional right.. shankar is wrong in this as well. lot of mistakes..

1) which article states the right ?
2) if u change rpa act, can u add/reduce the number of voter ?
3) if it is constitutional right to vote, then y the detained cant vote ? but they can file nominations..

It is a constitutional right regulated by appropriate act of parliament. Clearly mentioned in ncert. Its roots are in constitution.
If age of the voter is to be increased or decreased then why it requires a constitutional amendment???

Regulation is the key here. A person might lose his voting right subject to the provisions of rpa. The said person cannot challenge on the grounds of article 326 which gives a general guide line for all persons of an appropriate age to have a voting right.
Ps. I have marked constitutional right in the heat of the moment without deliberating much. But I guess it will be wrong.

Bro a person would also loose its right to freedom (6 rights ) subject to the provision of reasonable restriction. which is time to time decided by court and some are given in constitution it self.

On the same logic RPA provides only ground/situation/condition of reasonable restriction. according to which A person might lose his voting right.

Hi. Its not that court decide from time to time grounds on which the right to freedom can be taken away. It only checks if the grounds given for taking away the rights are within the ambit of reasonable restrictions provided in the article 19(2) itself.No new restrictions can be held valid. The reasonable restrictions are the only ones provided in the said article based on which govt can restrict different freedom. If yes see that article different freedom has different set of restrictions. N these are non negotiable. Court only see whether the law of a govt is within those restrictions or not. Article 19 in this sense is a complete article. No new restrictions can be added but everything has to be justified within the given restrictions.

Bun-maska

I think we can expect result anytime now. Its already 32 days and last time it came in 31 days.

Sorry last time it came in 38 days

Ab result date ki bhi speculation chalu karte hai