INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019 All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
@jal Bhai if you don't find dilemma here you won't find here because in each situation there would be an idealistic solution.. Even when there are two right options you can choose one depending on what value you favor most.. And seeing the questions of last year.. This example is at par My final solution I will complete my report and try and convince the cm the process is not politically motivated..meanwhile I will also have my senior in loop ..in case I m asked not to proceed I will demand it in writing.. Notwithstanding the fear of pending case I will proceed with suggested course of action because1) if I give in right now similar arm twisting is bound to happen in future- will be construed too flexible 2) I may be made a political scapegoat 3) I have full faith in judiciary and notion of innocent until proven guilty.. The cat wont disappear upon closing the eyes
I sincerely doubt this approach (in bold)....Powers of CM is much strong too be threatened by this argument. ...and finally it all boils down to performing your duty with uprightedness....
I m not asking cm for written orders.. He is not bound to give it anyway.. The thing is I can't take all decisions on my own.. The "writing" has to come from my immediate senior in bureaucracy.. If he says I shouldn't proceed I will demand it in writing.. This is the outcome of post emergency era when there were too many blame games.. It's not my innovation.. Don't feel anything wrong about it
Here i will post a daily case study. We all will brainstorm and try to find the best alternatives.
Possible answer format is : 1. Ethical dilemmas involved , facts of the case etc 2. Possible options with merit and demerit and 3. Stand you will take and why?
Six people have been killed and at least nine seriously injured after police opened fire on farmers protesting against land acquisition in Hazaribagh district of Jharkhand. The farmers were protesting against land acquisition by the Centre-owned National Thermal Power Corporation for a coal mining project in Brakagaon. The police took Congress legislator Nirmala Devi from Barkagaon in Hazaribagh into custody, which further escalated the protest.
The Pakri Barwadih coal block belongs to the NTPC and has coal reserves of around 1.6 billion tonnes. NTPC had sub-contracted coal mining to two private firms—Thriveni Earthmovers and Sainik Coal—in 2015.
The protests have been on for the past 10 years. This is the third time the police have opened fire at the protesting farmers in the area. On August 14, 2015, six people were injured in the firing. On July 23, 2013, one farmer was killed and three were injured.
In the past two years, the farmers have resorted to digging coal by hand, selling it to traders and paying royalty to the gram sabha in protest. Mining by the NTPC is likely to ruin land in 36 villages and make it unsuitable for agriculture.
According to media reports, the police had arrived at 4 am and tried to disperse the protestors. Women, who tried to stop the police, were baton-charged. The police says they had to resort to firing at the crowd after the protestors attacked police officers. Media reports suggest that six officers also sustained injuries during the event.
1. What is the ethical delimma ? 2. As an administrator what are the options with you,also its merits and demerits ?
Ethical dilemmas in above situation is 1) Should Farmer's land be acquired to facilitate larger developmental projects? If yes, then how and by securing the interests of the farmers? 2) Whether to resort to force on farmers who are protesting against land acquisition,which may violent at times? As an administrator, It is necessary to look at the cause of the protest. Following options might be followed. 1) Look whether proper procedures for acquisition had been followed or not? If not then report to relevant authority to re conduct the process so that relevant interests will get a say in entire project. Farmers protesting signifies that either Procedures to address their concerns were not followed or their concerns go beyond legally provided security. In former case , I think this option will bring out concerns. Demerits of this option involves further delay in decision making about the project. Further, it is possible that project may get abolished in all. But , these are the essential outcomes of proper decision making. 2) If their concerns go beyond legally provided security, then I think we need mediation with Farmers, Government and Company on the table. This option has potential to amicably solve the dispute without resorting to legal mechanism. The potential demerit of this option is that Deadlock may not get resolved. 3) If farmers still resort to protest against project inspite of all method of reconciliation, I would request political intervention, to convince them that their interest has been addressed. So, I would be prudent that they leave. The merit of this option is that it will give the villagers a chance to think and discuss that going against legally mandated decision is not what is wisdom. 4) Even if adamant attitude remains, Ultimatum will be given and possible actions to taken will be foretold. After , with minimum required force they will be evicted.
Ethical dilemmas in above situation is 1) Should Farmer's land be acquired to facilitate larger developmental projects? If yes, then how and by securing the interests of the farmers? 2) Whether to resort to force on farmers who are protesting against land acquisition,which may violent at times? As an administrator, It is necessary to look at the cause of the protest. Following options might be followed. 1) Look whether proper procedures for acquisition had been followed or not? If not then report to relevant authority to re conduct the process so that relevant interests will get a say in entire project. Farmers protesting signifies that either Procedures to address their concerns were not followed or their concerns go beyond legally provided security. In former case , I think this option will bring out concerns. Demerits of this option involves further delay in decision making about the project. Further, it is possible that project may get abolished in all. But , these are the essential outcomes of proper decision making. 2) If their concerns go beyond legally provided security, then I think we need mediation with Farmers, Government and Company on the table. This option has potential to amicably solve the dispute without resorting to legal mechanism. The potential demerit of this option is that Deadlock may not get resolved. 3) If farmers still resort to protest against project inspite of all method of reconciliation, I would request political intervention, to convince them that their interest has been addressed. So, I would be prudent that they leave. The merit of this option is that it will give the villagers a chance to think and discuss that going against legally mandated decision is not what is wisdom. 4) Even if adamant attitude remains, Ultimatum will be given and possible actions to taken will be foretold. After , with minimum required force they will be evicted.
Review maro yaar.</blockquo
Well tried.Your point numb 1 & 2 is valid from both merit and demerit point of view. Pont 3 & 4 need more clarification .As the case points out long standing position of farmers also earlier step taken by administration have failed.Now the situation has become critical by the loss of 6 innocent farmers.So use of force has not helped rather made the situation complex.Also to note the illegal mining activity and profit making by digging coal by hand.Many aspects need to be attended.Hope to see more good answer and points from friends.
thanks..I think there are major defects in the answer.... In order to handle the complex situation, Before point 1 &2 , it is necessary to calm down people's anger. May be certain techniques like compensation and livelihood (NTPC can do after project commence) opportunities for the killed's kins along with proper treatment of injured may help regain the confidence. Releasing the legislator may also create an environment for peace. It is necessary to assure them that their concerns will be heard. It is mentioned that villagers are taking the coal by hand and earning. Although this is illegal act, but I don't think law needs a strict enforcement in this case. I think an arrangement can be made where NTPC may forego a the loss made during this protest. NTPC can also guarantee that they can enhance their income by associating with NTPC, instead of themselves mining the coal.
There aare certian issues which I am doubtful about, Kindly Share views on this case..It's pretty nice case.
Day 1: As a DM of a home district of serving Chief Minister, you find out that a huge land scam has taken place in which close relatives of the Chief Minister are involved. The scam which you have unearthed has caused lots of financial loss to the state’s exchequer. You have been recently married to a daughter of an MLA who is known as staunch political enemy of the CM.
While you are investigating the matter for further proofs, before you make this issue public, the CM comes to know about this. He threatens you with dire consequences if you do not close the file and bury the matter silently. He threatens you with false criminal cases and CBI investigation in case you do not budge. Unfortunately, a case is pending against you regarding misuse of treasury funds, in which you haven’t done anything wrong. This case can be reopened and used against you. However, if you stop investigation, he has assured you that you will be given a plum post in the capital.
Identify which course of action are available to you. Examine each action’s merits and demerits. Finally, explain which course of action would you follow and why. (250 Words)
Some options for me in this case are:- 1. Keep quiet about the scam and get a good posting. This may be a stepping stone for future connivance with the CM. 2. Expose the scam and ask for an enquiry. This would lead to ire of the CM and my career may be in jeopardy. This may be seen as a political move against the CM as my father in law is a staunch opponent. 3. Approach the CM and say to him that this needs to be done for the general good rather than a political move to stain his or his party's image. I would go with the last option as it would give me a sense of satisfaction that I have done my part an officer of integrity and political neutrality. The first option of going hand in hand with the CM may give me better posts in the short run but the guilt of it would eat me from the inside in the years to come. Being sincere in my duties and being loyal to my employer even at the expense of hardships, e.g. due to a case against me would be by far a better option for me because that is what it is to be good civil servant.
1. What is the ethical delimma ? 2. As an administrator what are the options with you,also its merits and demerits ?
Ethical dilemma in this case are as follows:- 1. Public opinion vs duty as a civil servant: As an administrator, one has to implement the laws, rules, guidelines and orders given by the employer from time to time. Loyalty to the employer and building an image of a reliable worker is the aim of an employer. But also, concerns of a section or the society as a whole against such orders for whom one serves brings to the fore of legitimacy of the act, guidelines or rules in the moral sense. 2. Use of force to control dissent vs loss of valuable lives and injuries, damages to property etc.: it is the duty of the police under the instruction of administrators to rein in a mob or violent protest. In this case, it seems based on reports that the protest was a violent one. But also, one has to measure the extent of use of force for the purpose. Ultimately, a life of any citizen is priceless and one must understand the circumstances that drove them to such an allegedly violent act.
As an administrator, some options are: 1. Stick with orders and be a good implementor. Collateral damages are acceptable for the 'general good'. But then it leads to an image of unresponsive and anti-public perception of the system. 2. Consult with the higher ups and wait for their orders maintaining status quo. It may be the easiest way out for the administrator by shifting his responsibility to seniors. But it does not solve the problem as the public who are the most important stakeholder is not involved in bringing a solution. 3. The best option would be to bring about a peaceful and lasting solution to the 10 yr long problem by involving all stakeholders involved in deliberations. This can be achieved with proactive involvement of the administrator and inviting some leaders from the dissidents, police, higher officials, local politicians, NGOs, civil societies etc. This would bridge trust deficit and would be a win- win situation for all.
We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.Just dont spread the word ;)Sign in or join with Facebook or Google
ForumIAS is India’s leading Online website for UPSC IAS Exam Online Preparation and guidance. At ForumIAS, we have a dream. Our dream is to make its members achieve their IAS dream. Today thousands of aspirants have joined the elite services such as IAS, IPS, IFS, IRS and other central and state services with the right inputs provided by ForumIAS. Take a look at our IAS Toppers
Free IAS Online Preparation Initiatives by ForumIAS
Current affairs is the most important part of UPSC IAS exam. ForumIAS provides a detailed analysis of important news articles through its 9PM brief. In current affairs reading Editorials Online needs an in-depth focus and hence we provide a separate analysis of daily editorials which is not found in any other website. Click the following link to access these free preparation initiatives in Portal . ForumIAS also provides compilations and Free downloads for UPSC IAS preparation
Knowing is never enough for IAS exam. An IAS aspirant must be engaged in answer writing practice to do well in UPSC IAS Mains Exam. ForumIAS has launched a Mains Marathon initiative for IAS mains Online answer writing. Click here to access UPSC Mains Marathon initiative . For Daily Must Read Newspaper articles, Visit Must Read Newspaper page here. Must Read Newspaper is an Initiative by Team ForumIAS to provide Current Affairs links to the Must Read Articles of The Day from Newspaper.
UPSC Syllabus
The most important part of UPSC IAS exam is its syllabus and there is a need to take an in-depth look at it. Click here to view the UPSC IAS Prelims syllabus. Visit UPSC IAS syllabus page here
UPSC IAS Study Material
ForumIAS is the repository of many toppers’ Online study materials for GS Mains and Optional subjects. The most unique thing about it is that they are handwritten by toppers themselves. Click here for UPSC sample notes
Interview Preparation for IAS
Interview is the last and crucial stage for becoming an IAS officer. How to prepare for it? We provide a solution. ForumIAS is the only online website where quality IAS interview preparations happen. Online Current affairs from an interview perspective are extensively discussed and specific preparation based on candidate’s profile and hobbies can be done. Please visit this link for UPSC Interview Preparation
At ForumIAS we have an exclusive Online page to read the UPSC Interview Transcripts
Indian Forest Service (IFoS)
IFoS is one of the most sought after All India Service. ForumIAS provides the right approach to excel in this exam through their toppers who have shared their success mantras and their study materials in an elaborate manner.
About Indian Administrative Service (IAS)
IAS is considered as one of the best jobs on earth. IAS officers hold the most important positions in Central and State Governments and in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). They also represent India in international organizations. They take the most important decisions in the administration of Government policies and development programs.
About Indian Police Service (IPS)
IPS officers occupy higher positions in the State Police Departments, Central Armed Police Forces and Intelligence Agencies. Their most important responsibilities are maintenance of Law and Order and internal security.
About Indian Foreign Service (IFS)
IFS officers serve as diplomats in international missions and embassies of India around the world and in prominent international organizations like United Nations (UN), World Bank, and IMF. They work to promote India’s interests from a bilateral and a global perspective.
The Study portal is a single point of online IAS preparation through its several initiatives like the Must Read News Articles, the 9 PM Brief, the Mains Marathon. If you are preparing for IAS exam online, ForumIAS is the place to go. ForumIAS is proud of ForumIAS Alumni in UPSC Service who have secured top Ranks in past 5 years.
Visit Us At
ForumIAS - Offline Guidance Centre
ForumIAS Academy, 1st Floor, IAPL House, 19, Pusa Road, Opposite Metro Pillar 95-96, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005,
View Google Map Location
Comments
Nice mains notes for economy!
The Pakri Barwadih coal block belongs to the NTPC and has coal reserves of around 1.6 billion tonnes. NTPC had sub-contracted coal mining to two private firms—Thriveni Earthmovers and Sainik Coal—in 2015.
The protests have been on for the past 10 years. This is the third time the police have opened fire at the protesting farmers in the area. On August 14, 2015, six people were injured in the firing. On July 23, 2013, one farmer was killed and three were injured.
In the past two years, the farmers have resorted to digging coal by hand, selling it to traders and paying royalty to the gram sabha in protest. Mining by the NTPC is likely to ruin land in 36 villages and make it unsuitable for agriculture.
According to media reports, the police had arrived at 4 am and tried to disperse the protestors. Women, who tried to stop the police, were baton-charged. The police says they had to resort to firing at the crowd after the protestors attacked police officers. Media reports suggest that six officers also sustained injuries during the event.
1. What is the ethical delimma ?
2. As an administrator what are the options with you,also its merits and demerits ?
As an administrator, It is necessary to look at the cause of the protest. Following options might be followed.
1) Look whether proper procedures for acquisition had been followed or not? If not then report to relevant authority to re conduct the process so that relevant interests will get a say in entire project. Farmers protesting signifies that either Procedures to address their concerns were not followed or their concerns go beyond legally provided security. In former case , I think this option will bring out concerns. Demerits of this option involves further delay in decision making about the project. Further, it is possible that project may get abolished in all. But , these are the essential outcomes of proper decision making.
2) If their concerns go beyond legally provided security, then I think we need mediation with Farmers, Government and Company on the table. This option has potential to amicably solve the dispute without resorting to legal mechanism. The potential demerit of this option is that Deadlock may not get resolved.
3) If farmers still resort to protest against project inspite of all method of reconciliation, I would request political intervention, to convince them that their interest has been addressed. So, I would be prudent that they leave. The merit of this option is that it will give the villagers a chance to think and discuss that going against legally mandated decision is not what is wisdom.
4) Even if adamant attitude remains, Ultimatum will be given and possible actions to taken will be foretold. After , with minimum required force they will be evicted.
Review maro yaar.
free online Test
1. Keep quiet about the scam and get a good posting. This may be a stepping stone for future connivance with the CM.
2. Expose the scam and ask for an enquiry. This would lead to ire of the CM and my career may be in jeopardy. This may be seen as a political move against the CM as my father in law is a staunch opponent.
3. Approach the CM and say to him that this needs to be done for the general good rather than a political move to stain his or his party's image.
I would go with the last option as it would give me a sense of satisfaction that I have done my part an officer of integrity and political neutrality. The first option of going hand in hand with the CM may give me better posts in the short run but the guilt of it would eat me from the inside in the years to come. Being sincere in my duties and being loyal to my employer even at the expense of hardships, e.g. due to a case against me would be by far a better option for me because that is what it is to be good civil servant.
1. What is the ethical delimma ?
2. As an administrator what are the options with you,also its merits and demerits ?
Ethical dilemma in this case are as follows:-
1. Public opinion vs duty as a civil servant: As an administrator, one has to implement the laws, rules, guidelines and orders given by the employer from time to time. Loyalty to the employer and building an image of a reliable worker is the aim of an employer. But also, concerns of a section or the society as a whole against such orders for whom one serves brings to the fore of legitimacy of the act, guidelines or rules in the moral sense.
2. Use of force to control dissent vs loss of valuable lives and injuries, damages to property etc.: it is the duty of the police under the instruction of administrators to rein in a mob or violent protest. In this case, it seems based on reports that the protest was a violent one. But also, one has to measure the extent of use of force for the purpose. Ultimately, a life of any citizen is priceless and one must understand the circumstances that drove them to such an allegedly violent act.
As an administrator, some options are:
1. Stick with orders and be a good implementor. Collateral damages are acceptable for the 'general good'. But then it leads to an image of unresponsive and anti-public perception of the system.
2. Consult with the higher ups and wait for their orders maintaining status quo. It may be the easiest way out for the administrator by shifting his responsibility to seniors. But it does not solve the problem as the public who are the most important stakeholder is not involved in bringing a solution.
3. The best option would be to bring about a peaceful and lasting solution to the 10 yr long problem by involving all stakeholders involved in deliberations. This can be achieved with proactive involvement of the administrator and inviting some leaders from the dissidents, police, higher officials, local politicians, NGOs, civil societies etc. This would bridge trust deficit and would be a win- win situation for all.