INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

Can someone explain Sartre rejection of Transcendental ego ?

Guys not able to understand Sartre rejection of transcendental ego as postulated by Husserl due to dearth of quality material.. can someone please shed some light on this please?

Comments

  • Husserls' transcendental ego and Sartre objections to it


    Husserl’s phenomenological method, main aim, exploring the fundamental way in which human consciousness grasps reality by striving to isolate cognitive functions + empirical data.
    But later, Husserl’s thought took an increasingly idealistic turn and the notion of the Transcendental Ego became essential for his philosophy of meaning.
    Husserl moved towards transcendental-phenomenological idealim
    He seems to have reasoned as follows: 
    "The world" cannot be thought of except as being "constituted" by the transcendental ego’s intentional acts. 
    It follows, says Husserl, that nothing can exist if it is not dependent for its existence on the transcendental self. 
    This implies that the essences emerging as residues at the end of phenomenological and transcendental reduction are existentially dependent upon the transcendental ego. 


    This view makes Husserl a subjective idealist.
    The standard criticism of subjective idealism is that transcendent ego  implies that the Ego literally brings the world into existence. 
    In fact, many of Husserl’s early followers were disappointed by this development of his thought.

    This later thought of Husserl runs into the dilemma of any thought in the line of Berkeley, Kant etc that attempts to achieve final certainty based on the sole starting point of self-consciousness. 
    With this development of his thought, Husserl’s stated aim to achieve certain knowledge, presuppositionlessness in philosophy etc through his phenomenological method has ran into difficulties 

    Sartre's objections
    1 Sartre says that this concept of transcendental ego is against the initial position that Husserl himself took i.e. Theory of intentionality i.e. consciuosness means consciousness of something. 
    But nothing can be accepted as being consciousness of transcendent ego as this will amount to saying consciousness of consciousness
    Sartre says that there is no such thing as Transcendent Ego

    So Sartre says that conscioisness means lack of consciousness, consciousness has no contents

    2 For Husserl, pure consciousness, for which everything that exists is an object, is the ground for all meaning. 

    Sartre says that concept of Trabscendental Ego reverses the initial claim of Phenomenology i.e. to conduct  a presumppositionless 
    study and develop philosophy as a rigourous science

    3 Sartre criticizes Husserl’s notion by contending that it leads to the solipsism typical of subjective idealism

    4 Sartre says that existence is prior to essences

    Because of these differences, Sartre went on to pursue his own brand of existentialism
  • @forward Super thanks.. couldnt have find a better explanation on this topic than you presented
  • Thank you!!
  • Thank you!!
    your understanding of philosophy is quite good , how can I make so ?
  • It is my guess that Kant's antinomy of freedom (causal antinomy) is a likely question this time. So please do that.
Sign In or Join to comment.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google