INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

Discussion over NSG/MTCR

What possible gains/losses/opportunities/stakes? Is it worth the effort ?
Is cold war 2 in the making?
How does it the effect the geopolitics of S. Asia?
Has India drifted away from its soft power tag?
Dilution of NAM?

Any other views?

Comments

  • edited June 2016
    MTCR and NSG:

    What possible gains/losses/opportunities/stakes? Is it worth the effort ?

    Despite MTCR, technology could be traded in category 2, and only category 1 was difficult to procure. Category 1 is anyway not traded/transferred as it is deemed too strategically important. Thus MTCR seems to be the low hanging fruit with little value. There were earlier some Indian firms which were black-listed and ISRO too suffered earlier being denied missile tech under MTCR. But now with the progress made, there is really very little technical advantage of MTCR entry. Also many nations like Brazil and SA have reduced their missile projects due to MTCR pressure (there is no formal punitive mechanism though). So chances are that India may be allowed to retain it's current arsenal but pressured to drop its future development depending upon the political developments ahead.

    NSG is a different game altogether. It is crucial for technology (even third party tech like - Japan's reluctance causing hindrance in Westinghouse project). But for it, China needs to support India. China would want similar waivers and treatment to Pak too in return, which looks unlikely given it's abysmal nuclear record. India would gain nuclear material and tech crucial for its energy needs. There seems little to lose as India already has delineated its civil nuclear program from its military and placed the former under IAEA and additional protocol. India also agrees with FMCT so no concern there as well. The only concern is NPT which India may be pressured to sign. CTBT seems to be irrelevant from India's perspective because it is on a self-imposed moratorium.

    Is cold war 2 in the making?

    No one can answer that but clearly there are groups forming with China-Russia vs the West. While India was Russia-centric till now, US is trying to pull it in it's camp since Bush. Current development is interesting because China is part of and has veto in NSG but excluded from MTCR and now India is in MTCR and needs NSG. So there could be some quid-pro-quo, but not with India - which is still a kid at the big-boys table. Global trade and economics complicates the matter though and war in the conventional sense is far fetched. Rather proxy wars on the fronts of tariff, dumping, cyber, currency, geopolitics (Syria, Iran etc), asset-freeze would predominate.

    How does it the effect the geopolitics of S. Asia?

    MTCR entry is merely indicative of neo west-philia of India. Depending on how duplicitously US tackles Indo-Pak (with recent re-hyphenation indicated) and if/how-much India manages to scrape through in return from US on Pak front, geopolitics of S.Asia will be decided. Chances are that China will do as it pleases (like OBOR in PoK) and Pak will do as it pleases (like Pathankot) and US will merely lend words and quench the egos of Indian leaders without any real action, unless China heads to Japan or S.Korea - the true allies of US. MTCR has little effect on geopolitics of S.Asia other than symbolic. NSG would create some impact though.

    Has India drifted away from its soft power tag?

    India is trying to add hard-power to its soft one - like US. Nothing wrong in that. Yoga day, hot yoga (look it up and thank me later :wink: ) etc still convey India's soft power. India has considerable technology to be a middle-weight wrt hard-power, but it is obscured by other very conspicuous things like poverty, rape etc. Thus MTCR, NSG, UN, IMF reforms are less about acquiring the real tech/financial/strategic power and more about "looking" powerful.

    Dilution of NAM?

    NAM dilution had already begun with PVNR's "look east" and is obsolete in the muti-polar world of NaMo's Act East. Omni-allignment is the new fad.

    Any other views?

    Tell me, if I'd stabbed the mad king in the belly instead of the back, would you admire me more?
Sign In or Join to comment.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google