Hi guys
In recent times we have been bombarded with news of paper leaks & nepotism (AIPMT, RAS, SSC, VYAPAM, etc.) My question is that is it possible that there is corruption and nepotism prevalent in UPSC. I am having a doubt because the exam process isn't that transparent which one expects from a constitutional body like upsc and also in the forum I have seen marks of various candidates who have performed well in their optional 1 (145/250) but failed miserably in optional 2(13/250) and also sometimes marks given in mains also seem arbitrary ?
What are your views ?
Comments