This Guy's Fall in score is greater than Chinese/Indian or anyother stock exchanges!

Google

Comment made by this guy around 12 PM August 23rd. This is the second comment on Prelims 2015 thread!

Jabya: 120+ cutoff easy paper


Comment made by the same guy 27 hours after, ie 3 PM August 24th.

Jabya: scoring 92 according to forumias answer key,, any chances?


Sincere request to the over excited first attempt novices...learn to control your emotions and restrain from spreading some false information on sensitive topics. The psychic damage you have done with those comments are enormous.

And we cant blame these people. It is UPSC's mistake to ask some simple, idiotic questions and playing with lives of thousands of sincere aspirants. UPSC thinks that it is smart by introducing randomness in pattern of questions asked. But it doesn't realize what it is doing is complete BULLSHIT! When serious aspirants here are preparing what Basel III recommendations and their effects are, UPSC asks to which sector Basel is concerned with! I don't know what they are testing here. Questions like NITI Ayog, Fortaleza decleration are substandard and demoralizing many people. Hope UPSC is aware of what they are doing and be responsible while framing questions.

Krispy

Even coaching wallas are total psychos. Consider this article for example. It is written by Gopala Krishna of Brain Tree.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Hyderabad/civils-exam-leaves-aspirants-happy/article7573798.ece

Quoting from the article:

Since this is the first time that only Paper-I will be taken into account for calculating the marks for the Mains qualification, it is difficult to determine the cut-off mark, trainers felt. It is likely to be between 55 per cent and 58 per cent. Last year the cut-off was around 58 per cent.

Now this sad teacher doesn't even know that last year's cutoff was 53.25% not 58% of 385 (58% = 223).

Now what are the possible explanations. Either this guy is really really bad at maths to calculate 205/385 = 58%. This is a VERY likely explanation given this guy's anti-csat stance. After all this is the IQ level of the moron brigade that lead the anti-csat andolan. The other explanation is that he is lying outright to create panic among students so that they rush to his coaching institute. Even this explanation is also logical, given the integrity level of andolankaaris

Which explanation seems more logical? I am honestly confused.

P.S. Personally, am in an extremely safe zone - thanks to a lot of calculated guesses and luck factor. So all the anti-csat fools who hate me here need not rejoice. Just enjoy your randomness, you asked for it. I won't be surprised if UPSC asks even more factual questions (Like what is the capital of Telangana, When did India win independence etc.) and 30 superhard questions (like the Champak one) next year. This is what you guys protested for, and personally I am glad that you got it.

TL:DR - Don't direct your anger towards UPSC. It is really the fault of those protestors. UPSC doesn't want to positively reinforce these anti-constitutional methods. You are just caught in the crossfire. UPSC isn't pure evil, its just necessary evil.