INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019 All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
wat can be cut off the thread is about that pls stick to the thread
This is just another baker thread , in announcement mode , it's for quick bakar those who cannot scroll the other thread , I don't think ki anyone have any info this time around , mostly people are speculating around 105-106 marks that's it , date also being speculated on last years basis
right to vote is a constiutional right.. shankar is wrong in this as well. lot of mistakes..
1) which article states the right ? 2) if u change rpa act, can u add/reduce the number of voter ? 3) if it is constitutional right to vote, then y the detained cant vote ? but they can file nominations..
It is a constitutional right regulated by appropriate act of parliament. Clearly mentioned in ncert. Its roots are in constitution. If age of the voter is to be increased or decreased then why it requires a constitutional amendment???
Regulation is the key here. A person might lose his voting right subject to the provisions of rpa. The said person cannot challenge on the grounds of article 326 which gives a general guide line for all persons of an appropriate age to have a voting right. Ps. I have marked constitutional right in the heat of the moment without deliberating much. But I guess it will be wrong.
Bro a person would also loose its right to freedom (6 rights ) subject to the provision of reasonable restriction. which is time to time decided by court and some are given in constitution it self.
On the same logic RPA provides only ground/situation/condition of reasonable restriction. according to which A person might lose his voting right.
Hi. Its not that court decide from time to time grounds on which the right to freedom can be taken away. It only checks if the grounds given for taking away the rights are within the ambit of reasonable restrictions provided in the article 19(2) itself.No new restrictions can be held valid. The reasonable restrictions are the only ones provided in the said article based on which govt can restrict different freedom. If yes see that article different freedom has different set of restrictions. N these are non negotiable. Court only see whether the law of a govt is within those restrictions or not. Article 19 in this sense is a complete article. No new restrictions can be added but everything has to be justified within the given restrictions.
Bro.. no any Right is absolute/complete in its sense. Every right has certain limiltations which arises from time to time and has to be regulated by some provisions Provided in the other acts or by judicial explanations.... and mention of Right in such acts does not means the the Right is provided by act only..
right to vote is a constiutional right.. shankar is wrong in this as well. lot of mistakes..
1) which article states the right ? 2) if u change rpa act, can u add/reduce the number of voter ? 3) if it is constitutional right to vote, then y the detained cant vote ? but they can file nominations..
It is a constitutional right regulated by appropriate act of parliament. Clearly mentioned in ncert. Its roots are in constitution. If age of the voter is to be increased or decreased then why it requires a constitutional amendment???
Regulation is the key here. A person might lose his voting right subject to the provisions of rpa. The said person cannot challenge on the grounds of article 326 which gives a general guide line for all persons of an appropriate age to have a voting right. Ps. I have marked constitutional right in the heat of the moment without deliberating much. But I guess it will be wrong.
Bro a person would also loose its right to freedom (6 rights ) subject to the provision of reasonable restriction. which is time to time decided by court and some are given in constitution it self.
On the same logic RPA provides only ground/situation/condition of reasonable restriction. according to which A person might lose his voting right.
Hi. Its not that court decide from time to time grounds on which the right to freedom can be taken away. It only checks if the grounds given for taking away the rights are within the ambit of reasonable restrictions provided in the article 19(2) itself.No new restrictions can be held valid. The reasonable restrictions are the only ones provided in the said article based on which govt can restrict different freedom. If yes see that article different freedom has different set of restrictions. N these are non negotiable. Court only see whether the law of a govt is within those restrictions or not. Article 19 in this sense is a complete article. No new restrictions can be added but everything has to be justified within the given restrictions.
Bro.. no any Right is absolute/complete in its sense. Every right has certain limiltations which arises from time to time and has to be regulated by some provisions Provided in the other acts or by judicial explanations.... and mention of Right in such acts does not means the the Right is provided by act only..
also what latest/new NCERT says take a look..
1. Article 326 2. Latest SC judgement - rajbala vs. state of haryana case (Dec, 2015) 3. All text books -------------- all says RTV is a constitutional right
RTV is a legal right if you stick to only NOTA judgement (2013)
right to vote is a constiutional right.. shankar is wrong in this as well. lot of mistakes..
1) which article states the right ? 2) if u change rpa act, can u add/reduce the number of voter ? 3) if it is constitutional right to vote, then y the detained cant vote ? but they can file nominations..
It is a constitutional right regulated by appropriate act of parliament. Clearly mentioned in ncert. Its roots are in constitution. If age of the voter is to be increased or decreased then why it requires a constitutional amendment???
Regulation is the key here. A person might lose his voting right subject to the provisions of rpa. The said person cannot challenge on the grounds of article 326 which gives a general guide line for all persons of an appropriate age to have a voting right. Ps. I have marked constitutional right in the heat of the moment without deliberating much. But I guess it will be wrong.
Bro a person would also loose its right to freedom (6 rights ) subject to the provision of reasonable restriction. which is time to time decided by court and some are given in constitution it self.
On the same logic RPA provides only ground/situation/condition of reasonable restriction. according to which A person might lose his voting right.
Hi. Its not that court decide from time to time grounds on which the right to freedom can be taken away. It only checks if the grounds given for taking away the rights are within the ambit of reasonable restrictions provided in the article 19(2) itself.No new restrictions can be held valid. The reasonable restrictions are the only ones provided in the said article based on which govt can restrict different freedom. If yes see that article different freedom has different set of restrictions. N these are non negotiable. Court only see whether the law of a govt is within those restrictions or not. Article 19 in this sense is a complete article. No new restrictions can be added but everything has to be justified within the given restrictions.
Bro.. no any Right is absolute/complete in its sense. Every right has certain limiltations which arises from time to time and has to be regulated by some provisions Provided in the other acts or by judicial explanations.... and mention of Right in such acts does not means the the Right is provided by act only..
also what latest/new NCERT says take a look..
Bro agree with you that no right is absolute. I was talking about the point you said on new grounds to curb article 19. I had doubts on voting right though. Anyway myself marked it as constitutional. It won't matter much in either case. I have a decent score. Between good find on constitutional right in ncert.
right to vote is a constiutional right.. shankar is wrong in this as well. lot of mistakes..
1) which article states the right ? 2) if u change rpa act, can u add/reduce the number of voter ? 3) if it is constitutional right to vote, then y the detained cant vote ? but they can file nominations..
It is a constitutional right regulated by appropriate act of parliament. Clearly mentioned in ncert. Its roots are in constitution. If age of the voter is to be increased or decreased then why it requires a constitutional amendment???
Regulation is the key here. A person might lose his voting right subject to the provisions of rpa. The said person cannot challenge on the grounds of article 326 which gives a general guide line for all persons of an appropriate age to have a voting right. Ps. I have marked constitutional right in the heat of the moment without deliberating much. But I guess it will be wrong.
Bro a person would also loose its right to freedom (6 rights ) subject to the provision of reasonable restriction. which is time to time decided by court and some are given in constitution it self.
On the same logic RPA provides only ground/situation/condition of reasonable restriction. according to which A person might lose his voting right.
Hi. Its not that court decide from time to time grounds on which the right to freedom can be taken away. It only checks if the grounds given for taking away the rights are within the ambit of reasonable restrictions provided in the article 19(2) itself.No new restrictions can be held valid. The reasonable restrictions are the only ones provided in the said article based on which govt can restrict different freedom. If yes see that article different freedom has different set of restrictions. N these are non negotiable. Court only see whether the law of a govt is within those restrictions or not. Article 19 in this sense is a complete article. No new restrictions can be added but everything has to be justified within the given restrictions.
Bro.. no any Right is absolute/complete in its sense. Every right has certain limiltations which arises from time to time and has to be regulated by some provisions Provided in the other acts or by judicial explanations.... and mention of Right in such acts does not means the the Right is provided by act only..
also what latest/new NCERT says take a look..
1. Article 326 2. Latest SC judgement - rajbala vs. state of haryana case (Dec, 2015) 3. All text books -------------- all says RTV is a constitutional right
RTV is a legal right if you stick to only NOTA judgement (2013)
off course it says RTV is constitutional but it is also legal. but what about right to get elected.??
We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.Just dont spread the word ;)Sign in or join with Facebook or Google
ForumIAS is India’s leading Online website for UPSC IAS Exam Online Preparation and guidance. At ForumIAS, we have a dream. Our dream is to make its members achieve their IAS dream. Today thousands of aspirants have joined the elite services such as IAS, IPS, IFS, IRS and other central and state services with the right inputs provided by ForumIAS. Take a look at our IAS Toppers
Free IAS Online Preparation Initiatives by ForumIAS
Current affairs is the most important part of UPSC IAS exam. ForumIAS provides a detailed analysis of important news articles through its 9PM brief. In current affairs reading Editorials Online needs an in-depth focus and hence we provide a separate analysis of daily editorials which is not found in any other website. Click the following link to access these free preparation initiatives in Portal . ForumIAS also provides compilations and Free downloads for UPSC IAS preparation
Knowing is never enough for IAS exam. An IAS aspirant must be engaged in answer writing practice to do well in UPSC IAS Mains Exam. ForumIAS has launched a Mains Marathon initiative for IAS mains Online answer writing. Click here to access UPSC Mains Marathon initiative . For Daily Must Read Newspaper articles, Visit Must Read Newspaper page here. Must Read Newspaper is an Initiative by Team ForumIAS to provide Current Affairs links to the Must Read Articles of The Day from Newspaper.
UPSC Syllabus
The most important part of UPSC IAS exam is its syllabus and there is a need to take an in-depth look at it. Click here to view the UPSC IAS Prelims syllabus. Visit UPSC IAS syllabus page here
UPSC IAS Study Material
ForumIAS is the repository of many toppers’ Online study materials for GS Mains and Optional subjects. The most unique thing about it is that they are handwritten by toppers themselves. Click here for UPSC sample notes
Interview Preparation for IAS
Interview is the last and crucial stage for becoming an IAS officer. How to prepare for it? We provide a solution. ForumIAS is the only online website where quality IAS interview preparations happen. Online Current affairs from an interview perspective are extensively discussed and specific preparation based on candidate’s profile and hobbies can be done. Please visit this link for UPSC Interview Preparation
At ForumIAS we have an exclusive Online page to read the UPSC Interview Transcripts
Indian Forest Service (IFoS)
IFoS is one of the most sought after All India Service. ForumIAS provides the right approach to excel in this exam through their toppers who have shared their success mantras and their study materials in an elaborate manner.
About Indian Administrative Service (IAS)
IAS is considered as one of the best jobs on earth. IAS officers hold the most important positions in Central and State Governments and in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). They also represent India in international organizations. They take the most important decisions in the administration of Government policies and development programs.
About Indian Police Service (IPS)
IPS officers occupy higher positions in the State Police Departments, Central Armed Police Forces and Intelligence Agencies. Their most important responsibilities are maintenance of Law and Order and internal security.
About Indian Foreign Service (IFS)
IFS officers serve as diplomats in international missions and embassies of India around the world and in prominent international organizations like United Nations (UN), World Bank, and IMF. They work to promote India’s interests from a bilateral and a global perspective.
The Study portal is a single point of online IAS preparation through its several initiatives like the Must Read News Articles, the 9 PM Brief, the Mains Marathon. If you are preparing for IAS exam online, ForumIAS is the place to go. ForumIAS is proud of ForumIAS Alumni in UPSC Service who have secured top Ranks in past 5 years.
Visit Us At
ForumIAS - Offline Guidance Centre
ForumIAS Academy, 1st Floor, IAPL House, 19, Pusa Road, Opposite Metro Pillar 95-96, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005,
View Google Map Location
Comments
the thread is about that pls stick to the thread
and mention of Right in such acts does not means the the Right is provided by act only..
also what latest/new NCERT says take a look..
2. Latest SC judgement - rajbala vs. state of haryana case (Dec, 2015)
3. All text books
--------------
all says RTV is a constitutional right
RTV is a legal right if you stick to only NOTA judgement (2013)
I had doubts on voting right though. Anyway myself marked it as constitutional. It won't matter much in either case. I have a decent score.
Between good find on constitutional right in ncert.
but what about right to get elected.??