Who are the insiders whose info you want on the thread

Thor

Hi All,

I was just doing a random surf on the specualtion thread and it blamed moderators of suppressing insider info of few and only promoting of few. Well, we do not know whose info can be trusted and whose cannot be.

So, it is better we know from the forum members itself who all give info that can be accepted as trustworthy and only those will be updated.

@MattHardy @HeisenbergWwh @ramjet @all do post your views so as we can look at their posts and update the thread of the same.

@The_Last_samurai has stopped giving any info after the serious thread was closed for that matter.

hummingbird

No one all are fake.

indian2015

varshaupsc, pooja11

aur to koi hai nahi

HeisenbergWwh

I take all info very sceptically but ensure I don't express my view to those providing info. So no complaints/suggestions from me.
Better way will be people may tag you and hashtag ( #insiderinfo or something), when they feel that a genuine info has appeared and you can post that info (like doodlebean ji did it today).
And mods are doing a good job on that thread - taking pains personally, sifting through loads of garbage for relevant posts, for the convenience of other members.

NapoleonBro_naparte1

Samurai, Varsha and India.

warrior0602

sirji don't update anyone's info let them post on time-pass thread varsha info is contradictory and sometimes beyond imagination like copy check till 3rd march means result after 10 april.
The expected marks highest marks etc also puts in strain to some people so its better to let the thread be close only.

MarvHartigan

@The_Last_Samurai , @Varshaupsc , @Sleeplessnights_89 , @India , @Pooja_11

These 5 dont indulge in "masala talk" and I have enough reasons to believe they have genuine intentions.

Etat

India and VarshaUPSC are the most reliable as per proven track record.

fearless

Moderator shall leave it to the wit of people.. why shall they block info thread.? Let peolpe take what they feel is right. mods have actually started giving defacto approval to inforinformations which actually is speculation until proven otherwise.

W2W

@The_Last_Samurai , @Varshaupsc , @Sleeplessnights_89 , @India , @Pooja_11

These 5 dont indulge in "masala talk" and I have enough reasons to believe they have genuine intentions.

Plus that one person.. 2by2.. or 6by6 i guess.. he was good if I remember correctly.. All these names mentioned here deserve a wild card entry.

For everyone else, tagging + hash-tagging is the right approach as mentioned above. We can not be judgmental.

MarvHartigan

^^ yeah @W2W - he was a reliable guy, but he never came back after he was abused at the time of prelims.