INTERVIEW FOR CSE 2019
All ForumIAS members selected for CSE 2019 Personality Test must submit their details and DAF and register below to receive further instructions and guidance from ForumIAS. Click here to register now
INTERVIEW 2020 CHANNEL
ForumIAS Channel for Interview Preparation is now Active! Please join the channel by clicking here
We are hiring!

Question & Answers for Geography optional

edited October 2014 in Geography & Geology
Geomorphology
1.Wegner advocated like a lawyer not like a scientist, comment.
2.Write a note on:
a)Inversion of relief
b)Trappen Concept
c)Shield and mineralisation

Try to write the questions in 30-40 minutes.

Comments

  • done, in less than a minute

    Q---Geomorphology
    1.Wegner advocated like a lawyer not like a scientist, comment.
    2.Write a note on:
    a)Inversion of relief
    b)Trappen Concept
    c)Shield and mineralisation
  • done, in less than a minute

    Q---Geomorphology
    1.Wegner advocated like a lawyer not like a scientist, comment.
    2.Write a note on:
    a)Inversion of relief
    b)Trappen Concept
    c)Shield and mineralisation
    If you don't know, don't answer, and stay away. Someone in all seriousness starts a useful thread and it appears a joke to you. And your joke is not funny, its juvenile. Go amuse 10 years old with this.
    It is getting increasingly frustrating, earlier this stupidity was limited to 1-2 threads, now it is spreading.
  • edited October 2014
    1.Firstly wegner's continental drift theory was not the focal point of analysis as it was a result of possibility he came across while attempting paleoclimatic studies.
    2.his assumptions of free float of sial over sima without any evidence seems to be overlooked idea.
    3.passive oceanic crust as he advocated was a simply stated fact given that oceanic crust is as dynamic as continental.
    4.the effect of tidal and equator ward movement seems to be overstated as if it was the case such strong forces could affect the rotation of earth to standstill, but it is not so.
    Wegners theory seems to be argumentative at every point not substantiated scientifically , though it provided a much needed breakthrough and acted as a base for continental drift theory .

    Please someone can evaluate and add few more points..
  • वेगनर के कटु आलोचकों ने इसे सड़े पन्ने तक बता दिया था वेगनर स्वयं दुनिया se प्रार्थना करते रहे की सबूत लाओ ताकि थ्योरी प्रूव हो सके क्यूंकि उनके सारे प्रतिमान सिर्फ व्यक्तव्य थे जिन्हें वे स्वयं साबित नहीं कर पाए इसी कारण इसे एक वकील का काल्पनिक सिद्धांत ज्यादा माना जाता है जो ठोस धरातल पर नहीं उतरता उनके सारे पॉइंट सिर्फ जलवायु परिवर्तन se सम्बंधित ही थे
    वेगनर यह नहीं बता पाए की इसका आरम्भ बिंदु क्या था और उसी वक्त क्यों प्रवाह शुरू हुआ
    साउथ अमेरिका तथा अफ्रीका की समानता मज एक संयोग है

  • Q. Continent drift theory was ahead of its time. Examine
  • Q. Continent drift theory was ahead of its time. Examine
    Is your second optional was pub adm earlier?
  • Questions on Geomorphology
    1.State the difference between miogeosyncline and eugeosyncline
    2.Explain the dynamic equilibrium theory.
    3.Structure as dominant control factor in landform formation.Elucidate.
  • Questions on Geomorphology
    1.State the difference between miogeosyncline and eugeosyncline
    2.Explain the dynamic equilibrium theory.
    3.Structure as
Sign In or Join to comment.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google