Writing a good Essay in UPSC Mains, Explained by Anudeep Durishetty Answer Writing Focus Group for Mains 2018 – Details DOWNLOAD: UPSC Prelims 2018 GS Paper I UPDATE : Answer Writing Group ( Offline | New Delhi ) Registrations Are Now Open!
GUIDANCE IAS Geography(Opt.) @500+ Programme STARTS ON 26th JUNE 9:30 AM.
Venue:   11/5-B, Basement, Param Tower , Pusa Road, Delhi 110005. Call (+91)-9718793363, 011-45586829. Geography(Opt.) Online / Offline Test Series
& Daily Mapwork Program Online
To Enroll Click Here
Top 4 scorers in Geography (Opt.) are Guidance IAS Students: AIR 5 PRATHAM KAUSHIK (327 Marks); AIR 109 DHRUV MISHRA (318 Marks); AIR 411 SAI KIRAN D.N. (316 Marks); AIR 423 DHEERAJ AGARWAL (315 Marks)

On what grounds the dichotomy between is and ought can be justified or rejected?

Can someone please answer this..how to aproach
You wouldn't like me when i'm angry Because I always back up my rage with facts and documented sources. |Philosophy|


  • ????
    You wouldn't like me when i'm angry Because I always back up my rage with facts and documented sources. |Philosophy|
  • The is - ought dichotomy was propounded by Hume and it has been subjected to a lot of debate ever since.

    The primary difference between the two is that the 'is' refers to things as they are, i.e,they are matters of fact and are descriptive, while 'ought' refers to how things should be, it is normative in nature.

    Now, Hume says that 'ought' is simply a product of 'is', therefore what 'ought to be' is biased by our preconceived notion of what 'is'.
    For example: Meat eaters eat meat, and for them it is a normal thing which is descriptive. Therefore their perception of the world and on gaining nutrition will always be colored through their notion of eating meat (which is normal from their point of view). However, in a world which is normative, eating meat might be immoral.

    Therefore, according to Hume we cannot simply go from 'is' to 'ought', and morality is biased and pre-conceived since it is colored on the basis of 'is'. This is also known as Hume's guillotine.

    However, the dichotomy can be solved if we are willing to let go of all presuppositions and pre conceived notions:
    1. Husserl's phenomenology is one such way of seeing things as they really are after applying bracketing and reduction.
    2. Kant's categorical imperative says that morality is supreme therefore such a dichotomy does not make much sense.
    3. Functionalists like John Searle say that logic can be used to deduce facts, and is and ought are logically related.
    4. Existentialists say that truth that matters is subjective and is dependent on an individuals experiences, therefore morality is individualistic.

    Hope it helps bhai.
    "I watched C beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. Now all those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain"
  • Thanks a lot bhai...its clear now...
    You wouldn't like me when i'm angry Because I always back up my rage with facts and documented sources. |Philosophy|
Sign In or Join to comment.

Courses by ForumIAS for CSE
ForumIAS is trusted by over 10,000+ students for their Prelims, Mains and Interview Preparation and we currently run several assistance programs to help students from Civil Services prelims preparation to rank upgradation to IAS. You can enroll for these programs by visiting http://academy.forumias.com


We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google

Subscribe to ForumIAS Blog