If anyone have idea what were the reason behind calling NTT as constitutionally invalid.
Whether it was violation of Article 323B, inserted into the Constitution via the 42nd Amendment, violation of the basic features of the Constitution (such as the rule of law, the separation of powers, and the independence of the judiciary) or
whether Tribunal are inferior to HC coz the former neither have the capacity nor expertise
My understanding is that if NTT was invalid than same principle shud apply on all other tribunals also.
मैं खड़ा हूँ उसी दोराहे पे, आज भी इंतज़ार में तेरे !
या तो ज़िन्दगी आये तेरे लिबास में! या मैं चलूँ फिरदौस की तलाश में !!