"I really don't think there is anything that is better structured and more interactive in regard to Mains than the ForumIAS Mains Guidance Program." - Mitali Sethi (IAS-2016, AIR-56)
MGP Schedule C - Admissions Open Now!
Click here to read more
*Limited Seats. First Come, First Serve basis only.
Mains 2017 : The Only Course you will need to Score 400+ in GS
Mains Foundation 2017 by Ravi R Chokkalingam – to cover GS Paper 2, Paper 3, Paper 1 (Social Issues), Ethics & Essay – with 4 Full Length Mock Tests.
Classes (Online | Offline) commence from 27th June for Mains Foundation, Mains Current Affairs, GS Paper III, Ethics & Essay

Call : 9555923039 for early bird discounts

Seeking Justice For 30% Visually Disabled (One-Eyed) Aspirants in Public Employment

Seeking Justice For One-Eyed Individuals in Public Employment : Public Interest Litigation


If there is anyone in this group who is 30% visually disabled (one-eyed individual) and facing rejections from the government medical authorities with respect to his/her employment, then kindly e-mail me the specific issue at ankit.laroiya@gmail.com. Alternatively, you can also Watsapp me at 9811680054.

Please share with your friends.I am planning to file a PIL in Supreme Court on this matter.

Regards.
Ankit Kumar
·

Comments

  • Seeking Justice For One-Eyed Individuals in Public Employment : Public Interest Litigation


    If there is anyone in this group who is 30% visually disabled (one-eyed individual) and facing rejections from the government medical authorities with respect to his/her employment, then kindly e-mail me the specific issue at ankit.laroiya@gmail.com. Alternatively, you can also Watsapp me at 9811680054.

    Please share with your friends.I am planning to file a PIL in Supreme Court on this matter.

    Regards.
    Ankit Kumar

    Can you please tell me why government rejects person with disabled in one eye ?
    ·
  • Seeking Justice For One-Eyed Individuals in Public Employment : Public Interest Litigation


    If there is anyone in this group who is 30% visually disabled (one-eyed individual) and facing rejections from the government medical authorities with respect to his/her employment, then kindly e-mail me the specific issue at ankit.laroiya@gmail.com. Alternatively, you can also Watsapp me at 9811680054.

    Please share with your friends.I am planning to file a PIL in Supreme Court on this matter.

    Regards.
    Ankit Kumar

    as per rule they can deny only technical post but will be allowed with other non technical posts.
    ·
  • Seeking Justice For One-Eyed Individuals in Public Employment: Public Interest Litigation


    If there is anyone in this group who is 30% visually disabled (one-eyed individual) and facing rejections from the government medical authorities with respect to his/her employment, then kindly e-mail me the specific issue at ankit.laroiya@gmail.com. Alternatively, you can also Whatsapp me at 9811680054.

    Please share with your friends.I am planning to file a PIL in Supreme Court on this matter.

    Regards.
    Ankit Kumar

    Thank you, Ankit.

    Myself being an amblyopic did consult few Doctors and some google search, What I found is the candidate shall not be denied unless it is clearly mentioned in the advertisement.

    http://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebShowJudgment.do

    In Yogesh Dutt vs. Union of India and Others case, The petitioner did not fall in the category of visually handicapped, as he is not blind and also does not fall in the category of orthopedic handicapped as his disability is 30%, with loss of one eye. He thus applied in General, unreserved category.

    When a totally blind person can claim to be appointed as an officer in the bank, the declaration that one eyed persons is medically unfit, is a contradiction in terms. The Circulars of the Bank denying opportunity of employment of one eyed persons as clerks and officers, is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The issue raised in the present case is more a human right issue, than a disability issue.

    We are of the opinion that the petitioner has been illegally and arbitrarily denied appointment as a Probationary Officer. A writ of mandamus is issued to the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Probationary Officer for which he was selected in pursuance to advertisement No. CRPD/PO/08-09/04 within one month and to give seniority with effect from the date when a person next junior to him, in his category was appointed.
    ·
  • I am of the opinion that we can avail all Non-Technical posts without any quota or discrimination.
    There would be equal footing in case of IAS/IFS while IPS/IRTS would be out of bounds.
    ·
Sign In or Join to comment.

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google