MGP/MGP+ 2018 - Starts 18th Nov - Admissions Open.
Admissions for MGP/MGP+ 2018 are now open. Course begins from 18th Nov, 2018. Read Complete details here. To subscribe visit http://instamojo.com/ForumIAS

Ramjas College controversy. What's your view?

1356714

Comments

  • freeman said:

    Sabse pehle d so called seculars/liberals/left ( in short 'qtiyas') aur fashion feminists ko dum bhar peeto.

    tumhare hisab se so called secular kaun hai aur real mein secular kaun hai? yaa phir tum secularism mein faith hi nahi rakhte?
  • Kuchh bhee ho preet bhai,mayura ne mains clear kar diya hai :D :D :D >:)

    bhai agar padhega banda toh hoga hi.....
    Bhai bahut se padhne walo ka nahin hota :D :D :D :D >:)
    bhai kitna neeche giroge? neechta ki bhi had hoti hai
  • Campus politics bandh karwao. Jis kisiko bhi netagiri karni hai woh jaye ya to after hours ya bunk marke. Koi bandh ke nahi rakkha hai na? Freedom of expression bhi barkaraar raha aur freedom from political nuisances bhi.

    +1
  • @raar bhai , tumko itni lag gayi baat,reason ?
    Inbox me a jao,burger ka thread aur kitna kharab karun main.gyan tumhein inbox mein milega,how not to take things to the heart. :D
  • Bhai ye bachhe JNU or DU mein padhne jate hai ya fir Politics khelne jate hai. Inse padhai to hoti nahi aur salo laga dete hai padhne me.
  • @raar bhai , tumko itni lag gayi baat,reason ?

    bhai tumne lakshman rekha laanghi hain. khud aspirant hokar tumne ek fellow aspirant ka exam mein fail hone ka mazaak udaya, aur tab jab ki yahan matter bhi dusra hai.
  • edited February 27
    Burger said:

    freeman said:

    Sabse pehle d so called seculars/liberals/left ( in short 'qtiyas') aur fashion feminists ko dum bhar peeto.

    freeman naam likha hai apne or liberals ko pitwa rhe, yeh kaisa anyay hai :D
    'free' aur 'liberal' me antar hai, free kisi ideology me bound nahi hota, bas apne mann ki sunta hai , liberal ek ideology me bound hota hai

    liberal kahega ki ye cheez galat hai kyunki liberalism ke against hai, freeman kahega ki ye galat hai kyunki ye mere mann ke against hai :D
  • Look guys, this ForumIAS interview programme is going to start so I hv better things on my hand to do.

    By the way, what is wrong in finding a person beautiful but not her ideas.

    Anushka Sharma, Kangna Ranaut and Kate Winslet are beautiful. So, is Kanwalpreet/Gurmeher Kaur.

    Go learn a lesson in feminism first. You guys really need to. Dhaliwal paaji and this raar guy.

    bhai maine toh padha tha thoda sa zyada nahi, maybe a word sexist escaped your gaze bro. best of luck for your interview....
    I don't think calling someone beautiful EVEN REMOTELY qualifies as being sexist.

    On the other hand it only depicts your narrow understanding of feminism. It is only because of people like you that feminism has gathered negative connotations in popular imagination.
  • edited February 27
    raar said:

    freeman said:

    Sabse pehle d so called seculars/liberals/left ( in short 'qtiyas') aur fashion feminists ko dum bhar peeto.

    tumhare hisab se so called secular kaun hai aur real mein secular kaun hai? yaa phir tum secularism mein faith hi nahi rakhte?
    mere hisab se secular wo hain jo 'appeasement' me vishwas nahi rakhte, bas equality ki feeling hoti hai unme ki har religion ke log equal hain.

    jaise hi equality ki feeling se hate aur kisi khas religion other than own ko appease karne lage aur own religion k prati negativity aa gayi, to fir secular se 'sickular' ho jate hai log.



  • Why is right wing always treated as punching bag in the name of free-speech ??

    These left-liberal sickular megalomaniacs always think that what they say is right.
    And democracies all over the world and in major states of India keep proving them wrong.
  • pks11630 said:

    Why is right wing always treated as punching bag in the name of free-speech ??

    These left-liberal sickular megalomaniacs always think that what they say is right.
    And democracies all over the world and in major states of India keep proving them wrong.

    exactly

    ye sickularism latesh fashion hai
  • freeman said:

    raar said:

    freeman said:

    Sabse pehle d so called seculars/liberals/left ( in short 'qtiyas') aur fashion feminists ko dum bhar peeto.

    tumhare hisab se so called secular kaun hai aur real mein secular kaun hai? yaa phir tum secularism mein faith hi nahi rakhte?
    mere hisab se secular wo hain jo 'appeasement' me vishwas nahi rakhte, bas equality ki feeling hoti hai unme ki har religion ke log equal hain.

    jaise hi equality ki feeling se hate aur kisi khas religion other than urs ko appease karne lage aur apne religion k prati negativity aa gayi, to fir secular se 'sickular' ho jate hai log.
    yes appeasement nahi hona chahiye. i also agree. by the way tum koi example de sakte ho jahaan tumko laga ki appeasement hua hai. aur kya tumko lagta hai ki iss desh mein majority religion ki bhi appeasement hoti hai?


  • edited February 27
    .
  • pks11630 said:

    Look guys, this ForumIAS interview programme is going to start so I hv better things on my hand to do.

    By the way, what is wrong in finding a person beautiful but not her ideas.

    Anushka Sharma, Kangna Ranaut and Kate Winslet are beautiful. So, is Kanwalpreet/Gurmeher Kaur.

    Go learn a lesson in feminism first. You guys really need to. Dhaliwal paaji and this raar guy.

    bhai maine toh padha tha thoda sa zyada nahi, maybe a word sexist escaped your gaze bro. best of luck for your interview....
    I don't think calling someone beautiful EVEN REMOTELY qualifies as being sexist.

    On the other hand it only depicts your narrow understanding of feminism. It is only because of people like you that feminism has gathered negative connotations in popular imagination.
    bhai tum apni wider understanding me bata do matlab.... meri narrow me toh yahi hota hai,,, nd uske saath hi 5wave of feminism bhi shuru kar dena bcs pehle 4 toh corrupt ho gayi bcs of people like me..
  • raar said:

    freeman said:

    raar said:

    freeman said:

    Sabse pehle d so called seculars/liberals/left ( in short 'qtiyas') aur fashion feminists ko dum bhar peeto.

    tumhare hisab se so called secular kaun hai aur real mein secular kaun hai? yaa phir tum secularism mein faith hi nahi rakhte?
    mere hisab se secular wo hain jo 'appeasement' me vishwas nahi rakhte, bas equality ki feeling hoti hai unme ki har religion ke log equal hain.

    jaise hi equality ki feeling se hate aur kisi khas religion other than urs ko appease karne lage aur apne religion k prati negativity aa gayi, to fir secular se 'sickular' ho jate hai log.
    yes appeasement nahi hona chahiye. i also agree. by the way tum koi example de sakte ho jahaan tumko laga ki appeasement hua hai. aur kya tumko lagta hai ki iss desh mein majority religion ki bhi appeasement hoti hai?


    haan appeasement ka example le lo

    jaise d great 'sickular' barka dutt ya ndtv sirf usi communal violence pe focus karenge jaha mainly muslims k saath anyay hua ..jahan mainly hindus victim hote hain. waha ye chup rehte hain..aise numerous examples hai..kaun kaun sa doon...yehi baat kuchh politician pe lagun hoti hai aur ye DU, JNU,etc ke kuchh students par.

    majority appeasement to exist hi nahi karta.



  • edited February 27
    bhai...... banda...bilkul makhi hai...koi thread khula nahi ki.....bheen bheena ne lagta hai...... tatti samajh k.....
    You talk when u cease to be at peace with your mind




  • freeman said:

    raar said:

    freeman said:

    raar said:

    freeman said:

    Sabse pehle d so called seculars/liberals/left ( in short 'qtiyas') aur fashion feminists ko dum bhar peeto.

    tumhare hisab se so called secular kaun hai aur real mein secular kaun hai? yaa phir tum secularism mein faith hi nahi rakhte?
    mere hisab se secular wo hain jo 'appeasement' me vishwas nahi rakhte, bas equality ki feeling hoti hai unme ki har religion ke log equal hain.

    jaise hi equality ki feeling se hate aur kisi khas religion other than urs ko appease karne lage aur apne religion k prati negativity aa gayi, to fir secular se 'sickular' ho jate hai log.
    yes appeasement nahi hona chahiye. i also agree. by the way tum koi example de sakte ho jahaan tumko laga ki appeasement hua hai. aur kya tumko lagta hai ki iss desh mein majority religion ki bhi appeasement hoti hai?


    haan appeasement ka example le lo

    jaise d great 'sickular' barka dutt ya ndtv sirf usi communal violence pe focus karenge jaha mainly muslims k saath anyay hua ..jahan mainly hindus victim hote hain. waha ye chup rehte hain..aise numerous examples hai..kaun kaun sa doon...yehi baat kuchh politician pe lagun hoti hai aur ye DU, JNU,etc ke kuchh students par.

    majority appeasement to exist hi nahi karta.



    u said some politicians appease the minorities. lekin political parties ka main aim to election jeetna hota hai. aur election jeetne ke liye majority vote chahiye. aise mein minorities ko appease karke aur majority ko displease karke koi party election kaise jeet sakti hai? aur phir jo bhi govt reports hain sab kehti hai ki major minority community lags behind in all parameters of social and economic progress. to phir yeh kaisa appeasement? aur agar majority appeasement nahi hoti hai then why rioters belonging to majority religion go scot free in almost all cases

  • bhai...... banda...bilkul makhi hai...koi thread khula nahi ki.....bheen bheena ne lagta hai...... tatti samajh k.....

    tu tatti hai? :D
  • raar said:







    freeman said:

    raar said:

    freeman said:

    raar said:

    freeman said:

    Sabse pehle d so called seculars/liberals/left ( in short 'qtiyas') aur fashion feminists ko dum bhar peeto.

    tumhare hisab se so called secular kaun hai aur real mein secular kaun hai? yaa phir tum secularism mein faith hi nahi rakhte?
    mere hisab se secular wo hain jo 'appeasement' me vishwas nahi rakhte, bas equality ki feeling hoti hai unme ki har religion ke log equal hain.

    jaise hi equality ki feeling se hate aur kisi khas religion other than urs ko appease karne lage aur apne religion k prati negativity aa gayi, to fir secular se 'sickular' ho jate hai log.
    yes appeasement nahi hona chahiye. i also agree. by the way tum koi example de sakte ho jahaan tumko laga ki appeasement hua hai. aur kya tumko lagta hai ki iss desh mein majority religion ki bhi appeasement hoti hai?


    haan appeasement ka example le lo

    jaise d great 'sickular' barka dutt ya ndtv sirf usi communal violence pe focus karenge jaha mainly muslims k saath anyay hua ..jahan mainly hindus victim hote hain. waha ye chup rehte hain..aise numerous examples hai..kaun kaun sa doon...yehi baat kuchh politician pe lagun hoti hai aur ye DU, JNU,etc ke kuchh students par.

    majority appeasement to exist hi nahi karta.



    u said some politicians appease the minorities. lekin political parties ka main aim to election jeetna hota hai. aur election jeetne ke liye majority vote chahiye. aise mein minorities ko appease karke aur majority ko displease karke koi party election kaise jeet sakti hai? aur phir jo bhi govt reports hain sab kehti hai ki major minority community lags behind in all parameters of social and economic progress. to phir yeh kaisa appeasement? aur agar majority appeasement nahi hoti hai then why rioters belonging to majority religion go scot free in almost all cases

    political appeasement ko maine kaha object kiya..aur jise object kiya uspe tumne kuch bola hi nahi..topic divert kar diye bhai tum.
  • freeman said:

    raar said:







    freeman said:

    raar said:

    freeman said:

    raar said:

    freeman said:

    Sabse pehle d so called seculars/liberals/left ( in short 'qtiyas') aur fashion feminists ko dum bhar peeto.

    tumhare hisab se so called secular kaun hai aur real mein secular kaun hai? yaa phir tum secularism mein faith hi nahi rakhte?
    mere hisab se secular wo hain jo 'appeasement' me vishwas nahi rakhte, bas equality ki feeling hoti hai unme ki har religion ke log equal hain.

    jaise hi equality ki feeling se hate aur kisi khas religion other than urs ko appease karne lage aur apne religion k prati negativity aa gayi, to fir secular se 'sickular' ho jate hai log.
    yes appeasement nahi hona chahiye. i also agree. by the way tum koi example de sakte ho jahaan tumko laga ki appeasement hua hai. aur kya tumko lagta hai ki iss desh mein majority religion ki bhi appeasement hoti hai?


    haan appeasement ka example le lo

    jaise d great 'sickular' barka dutt ya ndtv sirf usi communal violence pe focus karenge jaha mainly muslims k saath anyay hua ..jahan mainly hindus victim hote hain. waha ye chup rehte hain..aise numerous examples hai..kaun kaun sa doon...yehi baat kuchh politician pe lagun hoti hai aur ye DU, JNU,etc ke kuchh students par.

    majority appeasement to exist hi nahi karta.



    u said some politicians appease the minorities. lekin political parties ka main aim to election jeetna hota hai. aur election jeetne ke liye majority vote chahiye. aise mein minorities ko appease karke aur majority ko displease karke koi party election kaise jeet sakti hai? aur phir jo bhi govt reports hain sab kehti hai ki major minority community lags behind in all parameters of social and economic progress. to phir yeh kaisa appeasement? aur agar majority appeasement nahi hoti hai then why rioters belonging to majority religion go scot free in almost all cases

    political appeasement ko maine kaha object kiya..aur jise object kiya uspe tumne kuch bola hi nahi..topic divert kar diye bhai tum.
    mujhe laga appeasement mein political appeasement bhi included hai. regarding the journalists u mentioned, if they show biased reports then definitely its wrong
  • edited February 27
    raar said:

    freeman said:

    raar said:







    freeman said:

    raar said:

    freeman said:

    raar said:

    freeman said:

    Sabse pehle d so called seculars/liberals/left ( in short 'qtiyas') aur fashion feminists ko dum bhar peeto.

    tumhare hisab se so called secular kaun hai aur real mein secular kaun hai? yaa phir tum secularism mein faith hi nahi rakhte?
    mere hisab se secular wo hain jo 'appeasement' me vishwas nahi rakhte, bas equality ki feeling hoti hai unme ki har religion ke log equal hain.

    jaise hi equality ki feeling se hate aur kisi khas religion other than urs ko appease karne lage aur apne religion k prati negativity aa gayi, to fir secular se 'sickular' ho jate hai log.
    yes appeasement nahi hona chahiye. i also agree. by the way tum koi example de sakte ho jahaan tumko laga ki appeasement hua hai. aur kya tumko lagta hai ki iss desh mein majority religion ki bhi appeasement hoti hai?


    haan appeasement ka example le lo

    jaise d great 'sickular' barka dutt ya ndtv sirf usi communal violence pe focus karenge jaha mainly muslims k saath anyay hua ..jahan mainly hindus victim hote hain. waha ye chup rehte hain..aise numerous examples hai..kaun kaun sa doon...yehi baat kuchh politician pe lagun hoti hai aur ye DU, JNU,etc ke kuchh students par.

    majority appeasement to exist hi nahi karta.



    u said some politicians appease the minorities. lekin political parties ka main aim to election jeetna hota hai. aur election jeetne ke liye majority vote chahiye. aise mein minorities ko appease karke aur majority ko displease karke koi party election kaise jeet sakti hai? aur phir jo bhi govt reports hain sab kehti hai ki major minority community lags behind in all parameters of social and economic progress. to phir yeh kaisa appeasement? aur agar majority appeasement nahi hoti hai then why rioters belonging to majority religion go scot free in almost all cases

    political appeasement ko maine kaha object kiya..aur jise object kiya uspe tumne kuch bola hi nahi..topic divert kar diye bhai tum.
    mujhe laga appeasement mein political appeasement bhi included hai. regarding the journalists u mentioned, if they show biased reports then definitely its wrong
    political appeasemnt to appeasemnt nahi business hai...game ka rule hai...

    media ya journalist ko bhi main dosh nahi deta kyunki wo bhi politically affliated hain..jiski khayenge uski nibhayenge

    political party affiliated students groups ko bhi dosh nahi diya ja sakta since wo bhi profit motivated hote hain

    problem bas iss baat ka hai ki common log jinka koi hidden agenda nahi wo influence ho rahe is sickularism se...unhe lagta hai is cool to be sickular..unhe khud ko as non-sickular logo ka victim show karna by exaggarating things acha lagta hai..they enjoy dis pseudo vcitimisation...they love to act as a victtim.

    waise hi ek aur fashion hai ajkal..doosron ko dikhane k liye kapde khud kam pehnke kehti hain ki soch aapki gandi hai..haha

    ab sunnyleone bhi kahegi ki soch aapki gandi hain.i was just nude :D
  • Ramjas college tragedy ye batati hai ki Indian Youth ka bantabhar ho gaya hai !!!!! :D
  • Ramjas college.iska c/o kitna percent rehta ,DU ADMISS. mein ?
  • pks11630 said:

    Look guys, this ForumIAS interview programme is going to start so I hv better things on my hand to do.

    By the way, what is wrong in finding a person beautiful but not her ideas.

    Anushka Sharma, Kangna Ranaut and Kate Winslet are beautiful. So, is Kanwalpreet/Gurmeher Kaur.

    Go learn a lesson in feminism first. You guys really need to. Dhaliwal paaji and this raar guy.

    bhai maine toh padha tha thoda sa zyada nahi, maybe a word sexist escaped your gaze bro. best of luck for your interview....
    I don't think calling someone beautiful EVEN REMOTELY qualifies as being sexist.

    On the other hand it only depicts your narrow understanding of feminism. It is only because of people like you that feminism has gathered negative connotations in popular imagination.
    bhai tum apni wider understanding me bata do matlab.... meri narrow me toh yahi hota hai,,, nd uske saath hi 5wave of feminism bhi shuru kar dena bcs pehle 4 toh corrupt ho gayi bcs of people like me..
    Matlab tumhare hisab se yadi maine kisi ko 'beautiful' keh diya to mai sexist ho gaya ?

    Wow! Fir to duniya ke saare aadmi sexist hue. Har bande ne apni life me kabhi na kabhi, kisi na kisi bandi ko beautiful/sundar/hot vagairah to kaha hi hotaa hai. Fir to sexism human males ka defining characteristic ho gayaa.

    Aur yadi bandi kisi bande ko handsome/cute vagairah kehti hai to uske liye kya word hai vo bhi bataata jaa bhai. Reverse-sexism ?

    Guru, tyyaari kar le. Ye left-liberalism ka khumaar kuchh nhi dene waala.
  • Ramjas college.iska c/o kitna percent rehta ,DU ADMISS. mein ?

    Acchha college hai.
    I guess it is one of the 3 oldest colleges of DU
    The day we decided that the worth of an individual was determined by their performance in an examination, that was the day Education failed us.

    Long live Revolution, Down with ForumIAS. Ban me Mods
  • edited February 27

    pks11630 said:

    Look guys, this ForumIAS interview programme is going to start so I hv better things on my hand to do.

    By the way, what is wrong in finding a person beautiful but not her ideas.

    Anushka Sharma, Kangna Ranaut and Kate Winslet are beautiful. So, is Kanwalpreet/Gurmeher Kaur.

    Go learn a lesson in feminism first. You guys really need to. Dhaliwal paaji and this raar guy.

    bhai maine toh padha tha thoda sa zyada nahi, maybe a word sexist escaped your gaze bro. best of luck for your interview....
    I don't think calling someone beautiful EVEN REMOTELY qualifies as being sexist.

    On the other hand it only depicts your narrow understanding of feminism. It is only because of people like you that feminism has gathered negative connotations in popular imagination.
    bhai tum apni wider understanding me bata do matlab.... meri narrow me toh yahi hota hai,,, nd uske saath hi 5wave of feminism bhi shuru kar dena bcs pehle 4 toh corrupt ho gayi bcs of people like me..
    Matlab tumhare hisab se yadi maine kisi ko 'beautiful' keh diya to mai sexist ho gaya ?

    Wow! Fir to duniya ke saare aadmi sexist hue. Har bande ne apni life me kabhi na kabhi, kisi na kisi bandi ko beautiful/sundar/hot vagairah to kaha hi hotaa hai. Fir to sexism human males ka defining characteristic ho gayaa.

    Aur yadi bandi kisi bande ko handsome/cute vagairah kehti hai to uske liye kya word hai vo bhi bataata jaa bhai. Reverse-sexism ?

    Guru, tyyaari kar le. Ye left-liberalism ka khumaar kuchh nhi dene waala.
    bhai tum apna socho...

  • edited February 27

    I only feel sorry for that beautiful Punjabi girl (Kawalpreet Kaur)...

    Her valiant father's soul must be pained to see her daughter turning out anti-national.



  • 2 dande bhakto ke lagaye jaye 2 dande sickulars ko aur 2 dande merko :/
    For Your Eyes Only.
This discussion has been closed.

Courses by ForumIAS for CSE
ForumIAS is trusted by over 10,000+ students for their Prelims, Mains and Interview Preparation and we currently run several assistance programs to help students from Civil Services prelims preparation to rank upgradation to IAS. You can enroll for these programs by visiting http://blog.forumias.com/courses

Welcome!

We are a secret self-moderated community for Civil Services preparation. Feel free to join, start a discussion, answer a question or just to say Thank you.

Just dont spread the word ;)

Sign in or join with Facebook or Google

Subscribe to ForumIAS Blog