1. In the context above judges have become the primary agents of constitutionalism in India. Did the framers intend so, or should there be formal restraints on judicial behaviour? How far has 'public legitimacy' been involved in the judicial decision making process?
2. Has the Supreme Court gradually engulfed other courts in ensuring the credibility of the Indian system as a compensatory mechanism against state failure? How has this impacted the same?
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.